The Nieves Law Firm Criminal Defense Attorneys

Call Directions Website Contact the practice

The Nieves Law Firm Criminal Defense Attorneys We take the criminal out of criminal defense. We take the "criminal" out of criminal defense.

2023 Inc 5000 Honoree
(2)

10/02/2026

In Part 4 of the Matthew Konen trial analysis, the defense continues to highlight the couple’s seemingly amicable communication during their divorce including apologies, laughter, and discussions about co-parenting their four children.
Jo-Anna Nieves discusses why those messages could be significant as the prosecution argues that marital conflict and financial obligations provided a motive for the killings.

The conversation also turns to a major question in this self-defense case: Will Konen take the stand? Jo-Anna explains the potential benefits and risks, including questions about the affair, financial obligations, credibility, and other evidence the prosecution could raise during cross-examination.
With the jury having only seen part of the evidence so far, there may also be issues that remain outside the jury’s view.

10/02/2026

In Part 3 of the Matthew Konen trial analysis, Jo-Anna Nieves examines the defense’s self-defense claim and why the extensive text-message evidence could be significant in understanding motive and the events surrounding the killings.
The defense is not disputing that Konen was present or that he was involved in one of the killings. Instead, the argument centers on self-defense and whether the threat continued after Konen initially disarmed the victim. Jo-Anna explains why the prosecution may focus on what happened afterward and whether the circumstances still supported a reasonable belief of danger.

The discussion also looks at the unusual timeline of the case. After the charges were initially dropped through a nolle prosequi in 2023 due to what prosecutors said was insufficient evidence, charges were later refiled. That raises an important question: What evidence emerged between the dismissal and the later indictment that changed the prosecution’s assessment of the case?

10/02/2026

Text messages from January 7, just weeks before the killings, offer the jury a closer look at Matthew Konen’s relationship with his wife and the circumstances surrounding their divorce.

Jo-Anna Nieves discusses how the messages appear to show the couple trying to communicate and reach agreements about their family, despite the affair and the breakdown of their marriage. They were also working through attorneys to resolve matters and maintain a relationship that would allow Konen to remain involved in his children’s lives.

That seemingly cooperative process could become an important part of the defense’s argument as the jury considers the prosecution’s claims about motive, planning, and premeditation.

10/02/2026

In the Matthew Konen trial, text messages introduced in court are helping establish the timeline leading up to the killings including marital problems, divorce, financial strain, and an affair.

Jo-Anna Nieves discusses how prosecutors may use those circumstances to argue motive, including financial pressures, child support, and an insurance beneficiary. But she also examines a key question for the defense: If Konen planned the killings, why would he choose that particular day when his father-in-law unexpectedly showed up?

The timing of the father’s presence could become important when the defense challenges the prosecution’s argument that the killings were planned and premeditated.
As the trial continues, the jury will have to consider whether the evidence points to a calculated plan or whether the events unfolded differently than prosecutors allege.

09/29/2026

Part 2: Jo-Anna Nieves, founding attorney of The Nieves Law Firm, joins Scripps News to discuss the ongoing investigation into an alleged sexual assault involving multiple fraternity members at Cornell University.

In this segment, Jo-Anna examines the potential discrepancies between the initial police report and the allegations described in the victim's lawsuit. She explains how investigators should approach cases involving alleged drug use and severe intoxication, including how the circumstances surrounding substance use, a person's state of consciousness, and the ability to consent can affect a sexual assault investigation.

Jo-Anna also discusses how thorough, evidence-based investigations can impact the handling of sexual assault allegations on college campuses and beyond, emphasizing that a complete investigation is essential to reaching a fair conclusion for both the prosecution and the defense.

09/29/2026

Part 1: Jo-Anna Nieves, founding attorney of The Nieves Law Firm, joins Scripps News to discuss the reopening of a criminal investigation into an alleged sexual assault involving multiple fraternity members at Cornell University in 2024. The former student, who alleges she was drugged and sexually assaulted, is now suing the university, claiming it failed to protect her.

In this interview, Jo-Anna explains why prosecutors may reopen a case after initially declining to file charges, what types of new evidence can prompt further investigation, and how Snapchat messages and screenshots may help corroborate an alleged victim’s account and connect the allegations to the individuals accused.

09/24/2026

Caleb Flynn Trial: Missing Devices, Text Messages & Witness Credibility

Testimony in the Caleb Flynn murder trial highlights the relationship between Flynn and his mistress, including hundreds of thousands of messages, efforts to hide their communications, and devices that are now missing.

Attorney Jo-Anna Nieves examines the credibility issues for the defense to explore on cross-examination. The witness has testified that she hates Flynn and believes he murdered his wife, while also acknowledging her own involvement in the relationship and in conversations that included deeply negative comments about Ashley Flynn.

Jo-Anna also discusses the defense’s potential argument that the missing phone and laptop could be significant if the jury believes the witness was not truthful about what happened to them. At the same time, she explains why those credibility questions do not necessarily eliminate the prosecution’s broader circumstantial case or its argument that Flynn had a motive.

09/24/2026

Caleb Flynn Trial: Questions About a Witness’s Credibility

As testimony continues in the Caleb Flynn murder trial, Attorney Jo-Anna Nieves examines some of the details that stand out from a key witness’s testimony including her account of misplacing her phone and laptop, her history with Flynn, and statements she previously made to police about their relationship.

Jo-Anna discusses why those details could become important for the defense if they choose to challenge the witness’s credibility, particularly given her admission that she previously lied to police and kept the relationship hidden.

At the same time, the prosecution is presenting the history of the relationship in a very different light, focusing on how Flynn met the witness when she was a young intern and volunteer at their church, the significant age difference between them, and what he allegedly told her about his conflicts with his coworkers and in-laws.
Jo-Anna breaks down how both sides could use this testimony as the trial develops—and what the jury may ultimately focus on when evaluating the witness’s credibility.

09/24/2026

Caleb Flynn Trial: Tool Marks, the Hammer & FBI Evidence

As Caleb Flynn stands trial for the murder of his wife, a tool-mark examiner takes the stand to discuss evidence investigators believe may point to the use of a specific tool and whether the damage found at the scene is consistent with an intruder or someone inside the home.

Attorney Jo-Anna Nieves breaks down the challenges of using tool-mark evidence to establish not only what type of tool may have been used, but whether investigators can connect that tool to Flynn himself.
Jo-Anna also explains the potential impact of FBI involvement on a jury, including how the agency’s forensic resources, expertise, and experience may affect the perceived credibility of the evidence presented at trial.

09/22/2026

Jo-Anna Nieves examines Kevin Reddington’s defense strategy in the Lindsay Clancy case.
In part two of her appearance on Australia’s TODAY show, Jo-Anna describes Reddington as a sharp attorney who, in her assessment, would have pursued a theory implicating another person if he believed that to be the strongest approach supported by the evidence.

Instead, Reddington offered to stipulate that Lindsay caused the children’s deaths and focused the defense on her mental health and criminal responsibility. Jo-Anna explains why she views that decision as a deliberate strategic choice based on the evidence before him.

She also discusses the pending defense motions, the legal questions surrounding a potential retrial, and what could come next in the case.

Follow The Nieves Law Firm for legal analysis and media commentary.
This content provides general educational commentary, not legal advice.

Address

160 Franklin Street Ste. 210
Oakland, CA
94607

Opening Hours

Monday 7am - 11pm
Tuesday 7am - 11pm
Wednesday 7am - 11pm
Thursday 7am - 11pm
Friday 7am - 11pm
Saturday 11am - 11pm
Sunday 11am - 11pm

Telephone

+15108797549

Website

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when The Nieves Law Firm Criminal Defense Attorneys posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Contact The Practice

Send a message to The Nieves Law Firm Criminal Defense Attorneys:

Shortcuts

Share

Category