Syed Imran Haider Sabzwari

11/03/2026

05/03/2026

اگر کسی مقدمے میں کوئی فریق اپنا گواہ پیش کرتا ہے اور وہ گواہ کسی بات کو تسلیم کر لیتا ہے، تو قانون کی نظر میں وہ تسلیم شدہ بات اسی فریق کے خلاف شمار ہوگی۔ بعد میں وہ فریق یہ نہیں کہہ سکتا کہ اسے اپنے ہی گواہ کے بیان سے کوئی تعلق نہیں یا وہ اس سے منحرف ہے۔ یعنی گواہ کی طرف سے مان لی گئی ہر حقیقت کو یہ سمجھا جاتا ہے کہ وہ اسی فریق کے علم میں تھی، اور وہ فریق اس بیان کا پابند ہوگا۔

The admissions of a party's own witness are legally attributable to that party and cannot be resiled from. Any fact acknowledged by the witness is deemed to be within the party's knowledge and binds it accordingly۔

26/02/2026

The Code of Criminal Procedure (Amendment) Bill, 2026.

(Insertion of new sections 59A, 431A, amendment of sections 154 and 431 of Cr.PC) passed by the Senate on 23 February 2026.

15/02/2026

نان و نفقہ کے لیے رخصتی ضروری نہیں۔
2026 SCMR 1

15/02/2026

PLJ 2026 Supreme Court (Criminal) 21

S. 498--Grounds of pre-arrest bail--Once the Court concludes that the accused would become entitled to post-arrest bail upon dismissal of his pre-arrest bail application, then requiring him to undergo incarceration would be a mere procedural formality devoid of any meaningful purpose.
MUHAMMAD AKHTAR Versus STATE etc.

15/02/2026

سیکشن 182 ت پ کی کارروائی مجسٹریٹ ازخود نہیں کر سکتا جب تک کہ متعلقہ پولیس آفیسر کی طرف سے استغاثہ ارسال نا کیا گیا ہو
2026 SCMR 77
Proceeding under section 182 PPC can not be initiated by Magistrate itself unless written complaint is not forwarded by concerned police Officer or his high ups.
Even Ex Justice of Peace can not direct SHO for Initiating FIR under 182 ppc against complainant.

14/02/2026

Once a Recruitment Committee has duly recommended a candidate for appointment, the competent authority cannot arbitrarily derail the process.

🔹 After recommendation, the authority is not vested with the power to:

Order a fresh written test

Re-conduct interviews

Restart the entire recruitment process

⚖️ Exception: Such action is only legally sustainable if there is proof of:

Material illegality

Mala fide (bad faith)

Violation of statutory recruitment rules

In the absence of these grounds, reopening the recruitment process amounts to an abuse of discretion and is liable to be set aside.

📚 Reference: 2026 PLC (C.S.) 121

15/11/2025

⚖️ Legal Insight: Admissibility of CDR Evidence in Court 📱📜

A recent judgment reported as 2025 YLR 427 reinforces an important principle in the law of electronic evidence: Call Data Records (CDRs) are only admissible when obtained directly from the authorized mobile service provider.

The Court held that CDRs routed through unofficial channels, such as those emailed by the IT Branch of a DPO office, lack proper certification, authenticity, and legal verification. As a result, such documents do not meet the evidentiary requirements under Pakistani law and cannot be relied upon in judicial proceedings. ❌

This decision underscores the judiciary’s commitment to ensuring strict compliance with statutory procedures for electronic evidence, promoting both fairness and accuracy in the justice system. ✔️

📚 Citation: 2025 YLR 427
🔖

14/11/2025

For any legal matters in Islamabad or Lahore, please feel free to contact our law firm. We are a team of dedicated professionals committed to delivering exceptional legal services and ensuring our clients’ interests are never compromised.

📞 Cell: 03008039637
📧 Email: [email protected]