11/02/2026
BEGGS CITY COUNCIL: A MASTER CLASS IN HOW TO WRITE AN ILLEGAL MEETING AGENDA IN JUST FOUR EASY STEPS!
The City of Beggs has apparently decided that if you’re going to hold a questionable executive session, you might as well put it on the agenda in writing for everyone to see.
Tonight’s agenda is a beautiful little case study in what happens when municipal government treats the Oklahoma Open Meeting Act like a set of optional suggestions.
Here’s the problem.
STEP 1: Put a personnel matter on the agenda.
They’re proposing an executive session to discuss the potential hiring or appointment of the Chief of Police.
STEP 2: Forget to identify the person you’re actually talking about.
Oklahoma’s Open Meeting Act doesn’t give cities a blank check to hide behind the word “personnel.” The executive-session exception under 25 O.S. § 307(B)(1) is limited. The public deserves enough information in the agenda to understand what personnel matter is being discussed.
STEP 3: Make it even more interesting by adding compensation and benefits.
The next agenda item proposes possible action on hiring the Chief of Police, including full-time compensation and benefits terms.
Apparently, the City of Beggs thinks the public can be kept out of the room while the city discusses the job, then invited back in when it’s time to rubber-stamp the deal.
STEP 4: Sign it, post it, and hope nobody reads it.
Well, somebody read it.
And that’s why we’re sharing it.
The Oklahoma Open Meeting Act isn’t a suggestion. Executive session is a narrowly defined exception to the public’s right to watch its government conduct public business. A city cannot simply label something an executive session and expect the law to magically cooperate.
CITIZENS OF BEGGS: YOU MIGHT WANT TO SHOW UP TONIGHT.
Monday, November 2, 2026
6:00 PM
Beggs City Hall
108 N. Broadway Avenue
Bring your questions. Bring your neighbors. And perhaps bring a copy of 25 O.S. § 307.
Because apparently somebody at City Hall needs a refresher course.
Guerrilla News will always have a special appreciation for public officials who put questionable government conduct on paper, sign their names to it, and then post it on the internet for everyone to examine.
Transparency: 10/10. Legal compliance: We have some questions.