Ried Pecina Trial Lawyers

Call Directions Website Contact the practice

Ried Pecina Trial Lawyers Contact information, map and directions, contact form, opening hours, services, ratings, photos, videos and announcements from Ried Pecina Trial Lawyers, Personal Injury Lawyer, 6502 Bandera Road Ste. 104, San Antonio, TX.

Ried Pecina Trial Lawyers represents individuals and families in personal injury and wrongful death cases stemming from accidents involving cars, motorcycles, trucks, buses, slip and falls, premises liability, work accidents and catastrophic injuries.

INJURED IN A FORKLIFT ACCIDENT AT HOME DEPOT? YOUR RECOVERY DESERVES CAREFUL ATTENTION.You went to the store for lumber,...
09/29/2026

INJURED IN A FORKLIFT ACCIDENT AT HOME DEPOT? YOUR RECOVERY DESERVES CAREFUL ATTENTION.

You went to the store for lumber, tools, or supplies. You expected to finish your shopping and get on with your day. A forklift collision or falling load can suddenly leave you facing medical treatment, time away from work, and questions you never expected to have to answer.

Who will pay for your medical care? What happens if you cannot return to your job right away? How do you find out what caused the accident? What should you do when someone from an insurance company calls?

At Ried Pecina Trial Lawyers, we help injured people understand their legal options and pursue accountability when the evidence shows someone else is legally responsible. We serve clients in San Antonio, Harlingen, Brownsville, and communities throughout South Texas and the Rio Grande Valley.

If you or someone you love was injured in a Home Depot forklift accident, you can start with a free consultation. Tell us what happened, where it happened, and how the injury has affected your life.

San Antonio: 210-941-0000
Harlingen / Rio Grande Valley: (956) 368-0000
You do not need to arrive with every answer. Understanding what happened is part of the work.

Forklifts move substantial loads through store aisles, loading areas, and places where people may be walking or waiting for merchandise. A collision can involve the vehicle itself, its lifting arms, the materials it carries, or objects displaced during the movement.

Injuries may result from:
- A forklift backing into someone near an aisle or loading area.
- Equipment turning into a person whose position was not clearly visible.
- Lumber, building materials, or stacked merchandise falling during lifting or unloading.
- A person being pinned between equipment and a shelf, display, vehicle, or other fixed object.
- A foot or leg being caught beneath a wheel or struck by the lifting arms.
- Equipment contacting a rack or stored merchandise and causing objects to fall.

Visibility, load stability, controlled movement, and separation between equipment and people are important safety considerations. The circumstances surrounding each incident need to be examined individually. Federal forklift safety guidance

The consequences can extend well beyond the day of the accident.
An injury may interfere with walking, lifting, driving, or standing for an entire shift. Medical appointments may require additional time away from work. Tasks such as carrying groceries, climbing stairs, or helping a child get ready for school can become difficult.

For a person who earns a living through physical work, those limitations may affect the ability to return to the same duties. For a parent or caregiver, recovery may require help from relatives or changes to the household routine.

These details deserve attention when evaluating how an injury has affected someone. A hospital bill shows one part of the financial impact. It may not explain the missed overtime, the work restrictions, or the activities a person can no longer manage comfortably.
A careful review considers the medical evidence, the person’s actual circumstances, and any supported future needs.

Taking practical steps early can help protect both your health and an accurate record of what happened.

1. Get appropriate medical attention.
Call 911 for an emergency. Explain how the incident happened and describe your symptoms accurately to your healthcare provider. Follow treatment instructions and keep records of appointments, medications, and work restrictions.
Tell your provider about relevant previous injuries or medical conditions, too. A clear medical history helps establish what your condition was before the incident and what changed afterward. Give accurate information rather than guessing about a diagnosis or trying to determine the cause yourself.

2. Report the incident and document the conversation.
Notify a store manager as soon as reasonably possible. Ask for an incident-report number and a copy of any written statement you provide. Record the store location, date, approximate time, aisle or department, and the names of the employees you spoke with.
Describe what you personally saw and experienced. If you do not know how fast the forklift was moving, who directed the operation, or exactly why a load shifted, say so. An accurate account is more useful than an estimate presented as a fact.

3. Preserve photographs and witness information.
When safe and permitted, photograph the equipment, materials, surrounding area, barriers, warning signs, and visible injuries. Save the original files.
Witnesses may have seen something you could not see, such as the forklift approaching from another aisle or the way a load was positioned before it moved. Obtain names and contact information when possible. Do not put yourself in danger or interfere with emergency assistance to collect evidence.

4. Keep receipts and records connected to the visit.
A purchase receipt, online order confirmation, pickup notification, or delivery record may help establish when and why you were at the location. Save relevant emails, text messages, and any correspondence from the store or an insurance representative.
Write down a timeline while the details are fresh. Include what happened immediately before the injury, what you remember about the incident, and what happened afterward.

5. Track the effect on your work and daily life.
Keep medical bills, wage records, missed-work dates, and related receipts. Save written work restrictions and communications about missed shifts or modified duties.
A short, factual record can also help explain your recovery. Describe specific difficulties, such as being unable to stand through a shift, needing help with stairs, or missing a family activity because of physical limitations. Accuracy and consistency matter.

6. Understand documents before agreeing to them.
A settlement is an agreement that resolves a dispute, often in exchange for payment and giving up the right to pursue it further. Before accepting an offer or signing documents that give up legal rights, have an attorney explain what they cover.

Get guidance about requests for recorded statements or broad access to medical records. Understand who is requesting the information, what they want, and how the request relates to the incident.

If you left the store without completing a report, tell the attorney that. If you did not take photographs, explain what information you do have. A receipt, medical record, witness, or later communication may still help establish the timeline. The consultation can help identify what additional information may be available.

A thorough investigation looks beyond the moment of impact.
Video may show the forklift’s movement, the position of a load, the placement of barriers, or how people entered and exited an area. Footage from before the incident may provide useful context, including how merchandise was arranged or how the activity began.

Other potentially useful evidence can include:
- Store incident reports and related communications.
- Witness accounts and photographs.
- Equipment inspection and maintenance records.
- Records identifying the operator and the companies involved.
- Training records relevant to the equipment and task.
- Procedures governing loading, unloading, and access to the area.
- Medical records and documentation of financial losses.

A local forklift injury attorney can send a written request to preserve relevant evidence and pursue available records through the legal process. Video may be overwritten, equipment may be repaired, and physical conditions may change. Early attention can help identify what needs to be preserved.

The investigation may also examine whether the operator had a clear view, whether the load was stable, whether the equipment was in safe operating condition, and whether people were appropriately kept clear of the activity. Federal forklift standards address subjects including operator training, visibility, loads, inspection, maintenance, and people walking through operating areas.

Legal responsibility must be supported by the facts.
Being struck by a moving forklift may involve negligence—failing to use reasonable care while performing an activity. An injury caused by a dangerous condition left on the property may involve premises liability, meaning legal responsibility for an unsafe property condition.
For an injured customer, a property-condition case generally requires evidence that the responsible business knew or reasonably should have known about the hazard, failed to take reasonable steps to address it or adequately warn of it, and thereby caused the injury.

These are different legal approaches with different proof requirements. Identifying how the injury happened helps determine which approach applies. Texas Supreme Court guidance
Depending on the circumstances, the investigation may need to examine the conduct of a store employee, outside contractor, equipment maintenance company, manufacturer, or another business. The company name on the building may be only one part of understanding who operated, maintained, or controlled the equipment involved.

An investigation should follow the evidence and identify the appropriate people and businesses before deciding whom to pursue.
The financial review should account for the full, supported impact of the injury.
Depending on the evidence and applicable law, compensation—payment for injury-related losses—may include:
- Reasonable medical expenses related to the injury.
- Supported future treatment needs.
- Income lost during recovery.
- A reduced ability to earn a living.
- Physical pain and significant emotional suffering.
- Lasting physical limitations.
- Permanent scarring or other lasting changes to appearance.

The available categories and amounts depend on the individual case. Medical records, work history, financial documentation, and other evidence help support the evaluation.
For example, an employee who returns to work on reduced hours may still have documented income losses. A person who resumes some activities may continue to have restrictions affecting other parts of life. Those details should be explained accurately rather than reduced to a simple statement that someone is “back at work” or “feeling better.”
For a self-employed person, useful records may include invoices, appointment schedules, contracts, and communications about canceled or postponed work. The goal is to document actual losses and explain them clearly.

Future needs require support as well. An attorney can review medical recommendations and consider whether additional professional input is needed to understand continuing treatment, work restrictions, or other long-term effects.
Insurance conversations deserve the same care as the rest of the case.

A representative may ask for your account of the incident, medical information, or documents supporting your losses. Keep copies of written communications and notes of important calls, including the person’s name, the date, and what was discussed.

If an offer arrives while you are still receiving treatment, consider whether you understand the medical outlook and the rights you would give up by accepting it. Your attorney can help evaluate the terms and explain which issues remain unresolved.

An offer should be assessed against the available evidence, the applicable law, and the documented impact of the injury. The amount offered at one point in the process may not answer every question about future treatment or continuing limitations.

If someone says you caused the accident, that statement deserves a careful review of the evidence. In many Texas injury cases, compensation is reduced by the injured person’s share of responsibility, and recovery is barred if that share is greater than 50%. Photographs, video, witness accounts, and the surrounding circumstances may be important when evaluating those arguments.

Getting legal guidance early also helps identify the deadlines that apply.
Texas generally requires a personal injury lawsuit to be filed within two years of when the right to sue arises, often the injury date. Exceptions and different rules can apply. Reporting an incident to a store or discussing payment with an insurance company is not the same as filing a lawsuit. Have an attorney assess the actual deadline rather than assuming those conversations protect it.

At Ried Pecina Trial Lawyers, the conversation starts with you.
We want to understand what happened and what recovery has been like. That includes the medical care you have received, whether you have missed work, what information you have from the store, and whether anyone has contacted you about the incident.
Our attorneys work directly with the people they represent. We can evaluate the circumstances, identify information that needs further investigation, review the injury’s documented effects, and explain the available next steps in plain language.

As a matter progresses, the work may include requesting records, contacting witnesses, reviewing available video, addressing questions about responsibility, and evaluating an offer to resolve the dispute.

Some matters can be resolved through negotiation. Others may require a lawsuit and court proceedings. The appropriate course depends on the evidence, the legal issues, and the circumstances of the case. Preparation helps make those decisions informed ones.
For your initial consultation, bring what you already have:
- The store location and date of the incident.
- A description of what happened.
- The names of any witnesses.
- Photographs or video in your possession.
- An incident-report number or written report.
- Information about your medical treatment.
- Any letters, emails, or offers you have received.
You do not need a complete file to make the call. If something is missing, explain what you know and what you have tried to obtain.

Whether you need a forklift injury attorney in San Antonio or legal help after a store injury in Harlingen, Brownsville, or elsewhere in the Rio Grande Valley, Ried Pecina Trial Lawyers is available to discuss your situation.

A serious injury can bring uncertainty about your health, your income, and your family’s routine. Getting clear information about your legal options can help you decide what to do next.

Injured at Home Depot? Let’s talk.
Free consultations.
Ried Pecina Trial Lawyers
📞 San Antonio: 210-941-0000
📞 Harlingen / Rio Grande Valley: (956) 368-0000
📍 7800 I-10, Ste 110
San Antonio, TX 78229
Serving San Antonio, Harlingen, Brownsville, and communities throughout South Texas and the Rio Grande Valley.
🌐 https://riedpecinatriallawyers.com/blog/forklift-injury-lawyer-mccoys-san-antonio/

If you were injured when another driver lost control in the rain, a Texas car accident lawyer at Ried Pecina Trial Lawye...
09/26/2026

If you were injured when another driver lost control in the rain, a Texas car accident lawyer at Ried Pecina Trial Lawyers can investigate the collision, preserve time-sensitive evidence, and identify every party who may be responsible.

Injured? Call (210) 893-0000 for a free consultation.

UNDERSTANDING HYDROPLANING AND RAIN-RELATED ACCIDENTS: WHO IS LIABLE IN TEXAS?

A driver who hydroplanes is not automatically excused from responsibility for a Texas car accident. Rain may help explain why the driver lost control, but liability usually depends on whether the driver responded reasonably to the weather and road conditions.

Hydroplaning occurs when water separates a vehicle’s tires from the pavement, causing the tires to lose traction. The driver may be unable to steer, brake, or control the vehicle until the tires reconnect with the road.

When I investigate a wet-road collision, I do not accept “the car hydroplaned” as a complete explanation. I look at the driver’s speed, following distance, tire condition, braking, steering, visibility, roadway drainage, and knowledge of the weather.

Those details often reveal whether the crash was truly unavoidable or resulted from decisions made before the vehicle lost traction.

Who Is Usually Liable for a Hydroplaning Accident?

The driver who loses control may be responsible if that driver failed to adjust to the rain.

Examples include:

Driving too fast for the conditions

Following another vehicle too closely

Making a sudden lane change

Braking or accelerating aggressively

Driving with worn or improperly inflated tires

Ignoring visible standing water

Using cruise control during heavy rain

Continuing at highway speed despite poor visibility

Failing to maintain the vehicle properly

Negligence means failing to use reasonable care under the circumstances. In a hydroplaning case, reasonable care depends on the conditions that existed at the time—not simply the posted speed limit.

Other parties may also share responsibility. Depending on the facts, liability could extend to an employer, vehicle owner, tire company, repair shop, road contractor, or government entity responsible for a dangerous roadway condition.

Driving Below the Speed Limit May Still Be Too Fast

Texas Transportation Code §545.351 requires drivers to operate at a speed that is reasonable and prudent under the existing circumstances. The law also requires an appropriate reduction in speed when weather or highway conditions create a special hazard.

That means the posted speed limit does not guarantee that a driver’s speed was safe.

A driver traveling 65 miles per hour in a 65-mile-per-hour zone may still be driving too fast if:

Heavy rain limits visibility

Water is collecting in the travel lanes

Vehicles ahead are slowing

Tire spray makes lane markings difficult to see

The vehicle has worn tires

The road curves or slopes

Traffic is congested

The driver cannot stop safely within the visible distance

In my experience, drivers frequently defend these cases by saying, “I was going the speed limit.” That answer does not resolve the issue.

The better question is whether the speed was safe for the rain, traffic, visibility, vehicle, and road surface.

Following Distance Matters More on Wet Roads

Texas law requires a driver to maintain enough distance to stop safely after considering speed, traffic, and highway conditions.

Rain increases stopping distance and reduces tire traction. A following distance that may be adequate on dry pavement can become dangerously short when the roadway is wet.

For example, a driver may rear-end a slowing vehicle after entering standing water and losing braking control. The driver may describe the event as unavoidable hydroplaning.

However, the investigation may show that the driver was following too closely to respond safely once traffic slowed.

Maintaining a safe following distance in changing traffic and road conditions becomes especially important when rain reduces visibility and traction.

Does Hydroplaning Excuse a Driver From Liability?

Not by itself.

The fact that a vehicle hydroplaned explains what physically happened between the tires and roadway. It does not establish why the vehicle entered that condition or whether the driver could have reduced the risk.

I usually ask:

How fast was the vehicle traveling?

Was the rain light, steady, or severe?

How much water was visible on the road?

Did other drivers reduce their speed?

Were the tires properly maintained?

Did the driver brake, accelerate, or change lanes suddenly?

Was the driver using cruise control?

How far was the vehicle from surrounding traffic?

Had the driver already encountered standing water?

Was there enough visibility to recognize the danger?

A driver who sees standing water and continues at an unsafe speed may be responsible for losing control.

A driver who makes an abrupt lane change during a downpour may also bear responsibility if that movement caused the tires to lose traction.

What If the Rain Began Suddenly?

A sudden storm can affect the liability analysis, but it does not automatically make the collision unavoidable.

Texas law sometimes recognizes a sudden emergency when a driver encounters an unexpected danger that the driver did not create. The question is whether the driver responded as a reasonably careful person would have responded under the same circumstances.

Rain is common and generally foreseeable. A driver who sees dark clouds, wet pavement, spray from other vehicles, or slowing traffic may have enough warning to reduce speed and increase following distance.

A more unusual event—such as an unexpected surge of water crossing the roadway—may present a different question.

Even then, the driver’s speed, attention, reaction, and earlier observations still matter.

Worn Tires Can Change the Liability Analysis

Tire tread moves water away from the tire’s contact area with the pavement. When the tread is badly worn, the tire may lose contact with the road more easily.

Important tire evidence may include:

Remaining tread depth

Uneven wear

Tire pressure

Tire age

Previous punctures or repairs

Mismatched tires

Maintenance records

Inspection records

Manufacturer information

Damage caused during the collision

From a trial lawyer’s perspective, the tires should be inspected before the vehicle is repaired, sold, or destroyed.

Once the tires are replaced or the vehicle is transferred to a salvage yard, valuable evidence may be lost.

A tire failure may also create questions beyond driver error. Understanding whether defective tires, poor maintenance, or another party contributed to a crash can help identify every potentially responsible party.

Can a Vehicle Owner Be Responsible?

Possibly.

A vehicle owner may share responsibility if the owner knowingly allowed someone to drive a vehicle with dangerously worn tires or another serious maintenance problem.

Liability may also arise when the owner allows an unsafe or unqualified person to use the vehicle.

The evidence may include:

Maintenance and repair records

Tire-purchase receipts

Inspection documents

Communications about vehicle problems

The driver’s license status

The driver’s collision history

The owner’s knowledge of mechanical problems

The precise legal claim depends on the relationship between the owner, driver, and vehicle.

What If the Driver Was Working?

If the hydroplaning driver was performing job duties when the crash occurred, the employer may be responsible.

This issue often arises with:

Delivery drivers

Sales representatives

Utility workers

Construction companies

Maintenance crews

Rideshare drivers

Bus operators

Commercial truck drivers

Employees traveling between job locations

An employer may be responsible for an employee’s negligence when the employee was acting within the scope of employment, meaning the employee was performing work for the employer at the time.

The employer may also have independent responsibility for:

Poor vehicle maintenance

Unsafe tires

Inadequate driver training

Pressure to meet unreasonable schedules

Requiring travel during dangerous weather

Ignoring earlier safety complaints

Allowing an unsafe driver to remain on the road

Commercial vehicles may carry more evidence than ordinary passenger cars, including driver logs, vehicle inspections, location records, dispatch communications, and electronic vehicle data.

Can a Roadway Defect Cause a Rain-Related Accident?

Yes. Poor road conditions can cause or contribute to hydroplaning.

Possible roadway problems include:

Inadequate drainage

Clogged storm drains

Deep ruts that collect water

Improper road slope

Construction barriers that redirect water

Missing warning signs

Defective pavement

Poorly designed repairs

Repeated flooding at the same location

The presence of standing water does not automatically make a government agency or contractor liable.

The investigation must determine who controlled the roadway, whether the condition was unreasonably dangerous, whether the responsible party knew or should have known about it, and whether the condition caused the collision.

Claims against a city, county, or state agency can involve governmental immunity, which means a government entity may be protected from lawsuits except in circumstances allowed by law.

These cases may also have notice requirements that arrive much sooner than the ordinary deadline for filing an injury lawsuit.

If roadway design, drainage, or maintenance may have contributed to the accident, the investigation should begin quickly. Rain may disappear within hours, drains may be cleared, construction patterns may change, and the vehicle may be removed before anyone documents the water level.

What If Several Vehicles Crash?

Rain-related pileups can involve several drivers and several insurance companies.

One driver may lose control and block a lane. A second driver may be following too closely. A third may enter the crash area at an unsafe speed. Another vehicle may be pushed into traffic without its driver having any opportunity to avoid the impact.

Liability must be evaluated separately for each driver.

Evidence may show:

Which vehicle lost control first

The order of impacts

How long the roadway was blocked

Whether later drivers had time to stop

Which vehicles were moving or stationary

Whether a driver changed lanes

Whether one collision caused another

Whether multiple drivers were traveling too fast

Do not assume the police report will identify every impact correctly.

In a complicated pileup, physical damage, video, electronic vehicle information, and witness accounts may be needed to reconstruct the sequence.

How Does Shared Fault Work in Texas?

Texas uses proportionate responsibility, which means compensation can be reduced by the injured person’s percentage of fault.

A person who is 50% or less responsible may still recover compensation, but the amount is reduced by that percentage. A person found more than 50% responsible generally cannot recover from the other responsible parties.

For example, if damages total $100,000 and the injured driver is found 20% responsible for driving too fast in the rain, the recovery may be reduced to $80,000.

Insurance companies use this rule to shift blame. An adjuster may argue that the injured driver:

Was driving too fast

Failed to use headlights

Followed too closely

Made an unsafe lane change

Failed to maintain the tires

Stopped too suddenly

Failed to avoid visible standing water

Because shared fault can reduce a Texas personal injury recovery, evidence about both drivers’ actions must be preserved even when one vehicle clearly lost control.

What Evidence Helps Prove Liability?

Wet-road evidence can disappear quickly. The sun may come out, standing water may drain, vehicles may be moved, and traffic may resume before an investigator arrives.

Photographs and Video

If it is safe, useful photographs may show:

Standing water

Tire tracks

Vehicle positions

Road slope

Drainage openings

Construction barriers

Lane markings

Vehicle damage

Tire condition

Visibility and rain intensity

Debris patterns

Dashcam, surveillance, doorbell, traffic-camera, and cellphone video may show the vehicle’s speed, lane movement, spray, braking, and loss of control.

Weather Information

Historical weather records can document:

Rainfall timing

Rain intensity

Storm movement

Visibility

Weather alerts

Flood warnings

The weather record should be compared with the precise time and location of the collision.

Electronic Vehicle Information

Some vehicles contain an event data recorder, commonly called a black box. It may record information from the seconds before a crash, including speed, braking, accelerator use, and other vehicle activity.

The available data varies by vehicle. It may be lost if the vehicle is destroyed, sold, repaired, or overwritten.

Tire Inspection

An inspection can measure tread depth, pressure, wear patterns, age, damage, and whether the tires matched the manufacturer’s requirements.

Cellphone and Vehicle Records

Phone records may help establish whether a driver was calling, texting, or using an application.

Navigation and vehicle data may also help determine speed, location, and movement.

Witness Statements

Witnesses may remember whether the driver passed other vehicles, changed lanes, entered standing water, or continued at highway speed despite poor visibility.

Crash Reports

A responding officer may document wet pavement, rain, visibility, contributing factors, vehicle movement, and citations.

Knowing how to read a Texas crash report can help identify what the officer concluded and what important questions remain unanswered.

Road-Maintenance Records

When a drainage or construction problem is suspected, relevant evidence may include:

Earlier complaints

Maintenance requests

Work orders

Inspection records

Road-design plans

Drainage studies

Prior crashes

Construction contracts

Photographs from earlier storms

Common Insurance Arguments After a Hydroplaning Crash

Insurance companies may argue that:

The rain was an unavoidable natural event

Their driver was traveling below the speed limit

The driver had no warning of standing water

The claimant was also driving too fast

The claimant’s tires were unsafe

The roadway caused the crash

Another vehicle initiated the sequence

The claimed injuries are inconsistent with the damage

The accident caused only property damage

The injured person waited too long to seek treatment

One mistake I frequently see is allowing the word “hydroplaning” to end the investigation.

Hydroplaning is the beginning of the liability analysis. It does not explain the driver’s earlier speed, following distance, tire maintenance, or decisions.

What Should You Do After a Rain-Related Accident?

Move to Safety

Wet roads create a continuing danger. If possible, move away from traffic and avoid standing between vehicles.

Call 911

Report the collision and any injuries. Tell the dispatcher if vehicles are blocking a lane or if flooding creates an immediate hazard.

Obtain Medical Attention

Adrenaline can mask pain. Head, neck, back, and joint symptoms may become more noticeable after the initial shock fades.

Document the Conditions

If you can do so safely, photograph the water, road, drains, vehicles, tires, traffic, and surrounding construction.

Identify Witnesses

Obtain names and contact information before witnesses leave. A neutral driver may have seen the hydroplaning vehicle speeding or changing lanes.

Preserve the Vehicle and Tires

Do not authorize destruction, sale, or major repair of important evidence before it can be inspected.

Save Digital Evidence

Preserve dashcam recordings, phone photographs, navigation history, text messages, and communications with the insurance company.

Be Careful With Recorded Statements

An adjuster may ask questions designed to establish that you were driving too fast, could not see, or failed to react.

Give accurate information, but do not guess about speed, distance, or timing.

Following the right steps after a Texas car accident can help preserve evidence before the roadway, vehicles, and weather conditions change.

What Compensation May Be Available?

An injured person may be able to pursue compensation for:

Emergency care

Hospital treatment

Doctor visits

Diagnostic testing

Physical therapy

Medication

Surgery

Future medical treatment

Lost income

Reduced earning ability

Physical pain

Mental anguish

Physical impairment

Disfigurement

Vehicle damage

Loss of vehicle use

The available compensation depends on fault, injury severity, medical evidence, insurance coverage, and the effect of the accident on the person’s work and daily life.

What I Examine in a Hydroplaning Case

When I evaluate a rain-related collision, I want more than a statement that someone lost control.

I look for:

The precise time and location

The posted speed limit

The drivers’ actual speeds

Rainfall and visibility

Road slope and drainage

Standing-water depth

Tire tread and pressure

Vehicle maintenance history

Driver braking and steering

Following distance

Lane changes

Electronic vehicle data

Dashcam or surveillance video

Prior flooding complaints

Earlier crashes at the location

Road construction or maintenance activity

The sequence of impacts

This evidence helps determine whether the crash resulted from negligent driving, unsafe equipment, a roadway problem, or a combination of causes.

Final Takeaway

A proper investigation should examine speed, following distance, tires, vehicle data, weather, drainage, and the actions of every driver involved.

Because many of those facts can disappear quickly, rain-related collisions should be investigated before the vehicles and roadway conditions change.

If you were injured when another driver lost control in the rain, a Texas car accident lawyer at Ried Pecina Trial Lawyers can investigate the collision, preserve time-sensitive evidence, and identify every party who may be responsible.

Injured? Call (210) 893-0000 for a free consultation.

This article provides general information about Texas law and does not substitute for legal advice concerning a particular accident.

Learn more at: riedpecinatriallawyers.com/blog/who-is-liable-in-texas-for-hydroplaning-rain-related-accidents/

Address

6502 Bandera Road Ste. 104
San Antonio, TX
78238

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when Ried Pecina Trial Lawyers posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Contact The Practice

Send a message to Ried Pecina Trial Lawyers:

Shortcuts

Sponsored

Share