My Legal Rights

17/07/2026

Article 19 gives every citizen the freedom to express their views. But no fundamental right is absolute.

Article 19(2) empowers the State to impose reasonable restrictions in the interests of:
• Sovereignty & Integrity of India
• Security of the State
• Friendly relations with foreign States
• Public Order
• Decency or Morality
• Contempt of Court
• Defamation
• Incitement to an offence

Freedom of speech is a constitutional right—not a licence to harm others or disturb public order.

Know your rights. Respect the law.

15/07/2026

Delhi High Court Examines Plea Over Sonam Wangchuk’s Hunger Strike

A petition has been filed before the Delhi High Court seeking urgent medical intervention for environmentalist Sonam Wangchuk, who is on an indefinite hunger strike. The plea requests continuous medical monitoring and, if medically necessary, life-saving treatment. As of now, the Delhi High Court has not passed any final or interim order. The case highlights the constitutional balance between the Right to Protest under Article 19 and the Right to Life under Article 21.

14/07/2026

Child custody matters require sensitivity, clarity, and the right legal guidance. Protect your child’s best interests with professional assistance for custody, visitation rights, child support, and legal representation.

Consult Rajiv Ranjan Dwivedi, Advocate on Record.

13/05/2026

Respect for advocates is not a privilege — it is the foundation of the justice system. ⚖️
An advocate is not merely fighting a case; he is protecting constitutional rights, liberty, and justice for society. Every lawyer, whether junior or senior, deserves dignity inside the courtroom.
If today one advocate faces humiliation in silence, tomorrow it can happen to anyone. This is the time for the entire legal fraternity to stand united — beyond chambers, seniority, and associations.
Bench and Bar are two pillars of the justice system. Mutual respect is what keeps justice alive.
An insult to one advocate is a message to the entire fraternity.
Stand together. Stand for dignity. Stand for the profession.

09/05/2026

Can the law decide when a woman should stop dreaming of motherhood?
A powerful constitutional debate has reached the Bombay High Court.
Two women aged 53 and 55 challenged the age restriction under assisted reproductive laws — arguing that reproductive choice, dignity, and personal liberty are fundamental rights under Article 21 of the Constitution.
The Court has now allowed them to undergo medical evaluation.
This case is bigger than age.
It is about:
⚖️ Bodily autonomy
⚖️ Right to motherhood
⚖️ Personal liberty vs State control
Sometimes law creates boundaries.
And sometimes constitutional rights challenge them.
The real question is:
Should the State decide a woman’s reproductive choices?

02/05/2026