My Legal Rights

13/05/2026

Respect for advocates is not a privilege — it is the foundation of the justice system. ⚖️
An advocate is not merely fighting a case; he is protecting constitutional rights, liberty, and justice for society. Every lawyer, whether junior or senior, deserves dignity inside the courtroom.
If today one advocate faces humiliation in silence, tomorrow it can happen to anyone. This is the time for the entire legal fraternity to stand united — beyond chambers, seniority, and associations.
Bench and Bar are two pillars of the justice system. Mutual respect is what keeps justice alive.
An insult to one advocate is a message to the entire fraternity.
Stand together. Stand for dignity. Stand for the profession.

09/05/2026

Can the law decide when a woman should stop dreaming of motherhood?
A powerful constitutional debate has reached the Bombay High Court.
Two women aged 53 and 55 challenged the age restriction under assisted reproductive laws — arguing that reproductive choice, dignity, and personal liberty are fundamental rights under Article 21 of the Constitution.
The Court has now allowed them to undergo medical evaluation.
This case is bigger than age.
It is about:
⚖️ Bodily autonomy
⚖️ Right to motherhood
⚖️ Personal liberty vs State control
Sometimes law creates boundaries.
And sometimes constitutional rights challenge them.
The real question is:
Should the State decide a woman’s reproductive choices?

02/05/2026

17/04/2026

🚨 Allahabad High Court on “Burqa Row” – What exactly happened?

A case came before the Allahabad High Court where an FIR was registered against two Class 12 students under the Uttar Pradesh Prohibition of Unlawful Conversion of Religion Act, 2021.

📌 Allegation:
A Hindu student claimed that her classmates pressured her to wear a burqa and convert her religion.

📌 What did the accused do?
They approached the High Court seeking quashing of the FIR, arguing that the case was false and fabricated.

⚖️ What did the Court decide?
The Allahabad High Court refused to quash the FIR at this stage and made a strong observation:

👉 The growing tendency among youth to impose their religious beliefs on others is a “disturbing trend.”

The Court further held:
✔️ Prima facie offence is disclosed
✔️ Investigation must continue
✔️ FIR cannot be quashed at the initial stage

📖 Legal Position:
Courts do not examine disputed facts in writ jurisdiction.
If allegations disclose an offence, the matter must go through investigation and trial.

📌 Why this case matters:
This case touches upon:
• Religious freedom vs coercion
• Scope of anti-conversion laws
• Limits of High Court’s power in quashing FIR

💬 Takeaway:
Quashing of FIR is not routine.
If there is a prima facie case, law will take its course.

—

⚖️ Neeraj Singh
Advocate | Delhi High Court
Founder – MyLegalRights

📞 8881885887

LegalInsights Courtroom MyLegalRights DelhiHighCourt LawyersOfInstagram

14/04/2026

On the occasion of Ambedkar Jayanti, we pay tribute to Dr. B. R. Ambedkar — the visionary who laid the foundation of justice, equality, and constitutional rights in India.

His legacy continues to guide the legal fraternity in upholding truth, defending rights, and ensuring justice for all. ⚖️

Let us reaffirm our commitment to the values enshrined in the Constitution and work towards a more just and equitable society.