17/10/2026
๐ ๐๐น๐ฒ ๐๐ฐ๐ฐ๐ผ๐๐ป๐๐, ๐๐ฟ๐ผ๐๐ฒ๐ป ๐๐๐ป๐ฑ๐ ๐ฎ๐ป๐ฑ ๐๐ฟ๐ถ๐บ๐ถ๐ป๐ฎ๐น ๐๐ถ๐ฎ๐ฏ๐ถ๐น๐ถ๐๐: ๐ช๐ต๐ฒ๐ฟ๐ฒ ๐ฆ๐ต๐ผ๐๐น๐ฑ ๐๐ต๐ฒ ๐๐ฎ๐ ๐๐ฟ๐ฎ๐ ๐๐ต๐ฒ ๐๐ถ๐ป๐ฒ?
๐๐ฑ๐๐ผ๐ฐ๐ฎ๐๐ฒ ๐๐ป๐ถ๐ธ, ๐ ๐ฎ๐ป๐ฎ๐ด๐ถ๐ป๐ด ๐ฃ๐ฎ๐ฟ๐๐ป๐ฒ๐ฟ ๐ผ๐ณ ๐ฃ๐ฟ๐ถ๐บ๐ฒ ๐๐ฒ๐ด๐ฎ๐น, in conversation with ๐๐ฎ๐ฟ๐ ๐๐ฐ๐ฟ๐ผ๐๐, examines the legal challenges surrounding mule accounts, cyber fraud and frozen bank funds. The discussion explores when an account holder may face criminal liability, the distinction between suspicion and knowing participation, police powers under Sections 106 and 107 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), and the growing debate over blanket account freezes versus targeted restraints on disputed amounts.
The conversation also examines important judicial decisions, the financial impact of account freezes on innocent individuals and businesses, and the safeguards needed to balance effective cybercrime investigations with the protection of legitimate funds.
๐ฅ๐ฒ๐ฎ๐ฑ ๐๐ต๐ฒ ๐ค&๐: ๐ ๐๐น๐ฒ ๐๐ฐ๐ฐ๐ผ๐๐ป๐๐, ๐๐ฟ๐ผ๐๐ฒ๐ป ๐๐๐ป๐ฑ๐ ๐ฎ๐ป๐ฑ ๐๐ฟ๐ถ๐บ๐ถ๐ป๐ฎ๐น ๐๐ถ๐ฎ๐ฏ๐ถ๐น๐ถ๐๐: ๐ช๐ต๐ฒ๐ฟ๐ฒ ๐ฆ๐ต๐ผ๐๐น๐ฑ ๐๐ต๐ฒ ๐๐ฎ๐ ๐๐ฟ๐ฎ๐ ๐๐ต๐ฒ ๐๐ถ๐ป๐ฒ? (Link in bio)
https://www.barsacross.com/mule-accounts-frozen-funds-criminal-liability-india
๐ ๐ฒ๐ฒ๐ ๐๐ต๐ฒ ๐๐
๐ฝ๐ฒ๐ฟ๐: ๐๐ฑ๐๐ผ๐ฐ๐ฎ๐๐ฒ ๐๐ป๐ถ๐ธ
https://www.barsacross.com/advocate-anik
๐๐
๐ฝ๐น๐ผ๐ฟ๐ฒ ๐๐ต๐ฒ ๐๐ถ๐ฟ๐บ: ๐ฃ๐ฟ๐ถ๐บ๐ฒ ๐๐ฒ๐ด๐ฎ๐น
https://www.barsacross.com/prime-legal