22/07/2022
May a parent claim maintenance from the other parent for and on behalf of an adult dependent child upon their divorce?
This is the question that arose in the recent Supreme Court of Appeal matter Z v Z (556/2021)[2022] ZASCA 113 (21 July 2022)
In this matter the mother claimed maintenance from the father in respect of 2 dependent major children. She relied on Section 6 of the Divorce Act 70 of 1970. This section deals with the “safeguarding of interests of dependent and minor children.” Sections 1(a) and (3) are relevant:
“(1) A decree of divorce shall not be granted until the court-
(a) is satisfied that the provisions made or contemplated with regard to the welfare of any minor or dependent child of the marriage are satisfactory or are the best that can be effected in the circumstances…”
“(3) A court granting a decree of divorce may, in regard to the maintenance of a dependent child of the marriage or the custody or guardianship of, or access to, a minor child of the marriage, make any order which it may deem fit, and may in particular, if in its opinion it would be in the interests of such minor child to do so, grant to either parent the sole guardianship (which shall include the power to consent to the marriage of the child) or the sole custody of the minor, and the court may order that, on the predecease of the parent to whom the sole guardianship of the minor is granted, a person other than the surviving parent shall be the guardian of the minor, either jointly with or to the exclusion of the surviving parent.”
There are conflicting high court decisions on whether a parent has the necessary legal standing to claim maintenance from the other parent on behalf of adult dependent children in divorce matters.
The father in this matter raised a special plea that the mother has no locus standi to claim maintenance on behalf of their major children and he argued that the children had to institute maintenance proceedings in their own names. The father’s special plea succeeded in the court a quo. The mother then appealed this ruling.
The appeal court interpreted Section 6 of the Divorce Act as aforementioned and concluded that Sections 6(1)(a) and 6(3) do not differentiate between a minor child and an adult dependent child of the marriage in regard to the payment of maintenance. Section 6(3), also in regard to the maintenance of a major dependent child, stipulates that the court may make any order which it deems fit. The appeal court therefore came to the conclusion that Section 6(1)(a) and 6(3) do allow a parent to claim maintenance on behalf of adult dependent children upon divorce because the purpose of these sections are to safeguard the welfare of both adult dependent and minor children of the marriage.
The appeal court upheld the appeal with costs and the father’s special plea was dismissed.
Call Du Pre Le Roux Attorneys today to answer all your divorce and maintenance questions.