Opropsa Oosthuysen Att Inc

Opropsa Oosthuysen Att Inc Attorneys, Notaries, Conveyancers, Estate Agents, Property Specialist, Body Corporate Management. Ho

14/01/2026

Take everyday as it comes

15/12/2025

Bonthuys and Others v Scheepers CA 303/2006 [2007] ZAECHEC - Use of business in Complex

In the unreported case of Bonthuys and Others v Scheepers CA 303/2006 [2007] ZAECHEC (17 Sept 2007), the High Court of the Eastern Cape reversed the decision of the Magistrate’s Court, granting consent to the owner of a unit in a residential sectional title scheme to run her hairdressing salon. The court allowed the appeal because the lady started the business without obtaining the written consent of the owners in terms of section 44(1)(g), and because the refusal of 13 of the owners to grant their consent was not unfairly prejudicial to the applicant. The court followed the court in Cujè-Jakoby & Another v Kaschub & Another 2007 3 SA 345 (C) in interpreting the word “unfairly” where the court found that the words “unfairly prejudicial, unjust or inequitable” denoted conduct which departed from the accepted standards of fair play and that the word “unfairly” should be equated with the word “unreasonably.” The Court found that the prejudice suffered by the other owners, far outweighs the prejudice that may be suffered by the applicant. It was decided that:
• The hairdressing salon would affect the peace and tranquility associated with a residential scheme.
• The fact that the applicant created a separate entrance for her clients would compromise the security of the other owners.
• The evidence did not indicate any value added to the other owners, but rather suggested an adverse effect on the owners.
• It was stressed that personal circumstances of the applicant namely that she lost her job because the salon she worked for closed down and that she struggles to support a four year old child, did not justify a departure from the established scheme.

07/11/2023

OOSTHUYSEN PROKUREURS

Benodig die dienste van ‘n litigasie assistant met ten minste 3 jaar ondervinding.

REKENAARVAARDIGHEID EN ONDERVINDING IS ‘N VEREISTE
SALARIS - OP AANVRAAG

Om meer uit te vind, stuur ‘n epos na:

[email protected]

Dit is belangrik om die “auto reply” te lees en daarop te reageer. Slegs kandidate wat op die “auto reply” reageer sal oorweeg word.

Attorneys, Notaries, Conveyancers, Estate Agents, Property Specialist, Body Corporate Management. Ho

OOSTHUYSEN ATT INC T.A OPROPSAREQUIRES THE SERVICES OF ALITIGATION ASSISTANTTHE SUCCESSFUL CANDIDATE WILLBE REQUIRED TO ...
24/06/2023

OOSTHUYSEN ATT INC T.A OPROPSA
REQUIRES THE SERVICES OF A
LITIGATION ASSISTANT

THE SUCCESSFUL CANDIDATE WILL
BE REQUIRED TO ATTEND TO:
LEGAL ASSISTANCE
AND DRAFTING OF LEGAL DOCUMENTS

COMPUTER SKILLS COMPULSORY
Salary R8 000.00 plus 30% Commission

Send an empty email to:
[email protected] to receive further information.

Please read the auto reply. Only applicants who respond to the auto reply, applications will be considered.

OOSTHUYSEN ATT INC H.A OPROPSA PROKUREURSBenodig die dienste van ‘n litigasie assistent.Die suksesvolle kandidaat sal on...
21/06/2023

OOSTHUYSEN ATT INC H.A OPROPSA PROKUREURS

Benodig die dienste van ‘n litigasie assistent.

Die suksesvolle kandidaat sal onder andere die volgende hanteer:

Opstel van pleitstukke, Invorderings, Regspersoon navrae en bystand, ens

REKENAARVAARDIGHEID EN ONDERVINDING IS ‘N VEREISTE
SALARIS - R8 000.00 PLUS 30% KOMMISIE

Om meer uit te vind, stuur ‘n epos na [email protected].

Dit is belangrik om die “auto reply” te lees en daarop te reageer. Slegs aansoekers wat op die “auto reply” reageer sal oorweeg word.

10/05/2023

Pretoria High Court made a revolutionary judgement declaring section 7(3) of the Divorce Act to be inconsistent with the Constitution.

02/03/2023

ADVISORY


2 March 2023: For immediate release

National Council for and of Persons with Disabilities and the Law Society of South Africa v Minister of Transport, Road Accident Fund and Another (GJ) (case no 039100/2022) (Tolmay J)

This media statement is issued as a follow-up to the LSSA’s prior media statement issued on 21 December 2022 concerning the above matter which is a constitutional challenge to the medical tariffs promulgated by the Minister of Transport on 19 August 2022 applicable to victims of car accidents claiming from the Road Accident Fund (the RAF). In terms of these tariffs the RAF would only pay much less than the actual costs incurred leaving the accident victim out of pocket and with no other remedy. These tariffs also do not cover certain critical services – such as air ambulances by helicopter – which places road accident victims at serious risk.

The LSSA and the National Council for and of Persons with Disabilities were thus forced to bring a challenge to the tariffs, and to seek urgent interim relief after the RAF refused to provide an undertaking that the tariffs would be suspended until such time as a legal review of the tariffs could be heard.

On 15 December 2022, the honourable Madam Justice Tolmay delivered an urgent judgment granting an interim interdict suspending the operation of the tariffs.

In terms of the judgment delivered by Judge Tolmay on 15 December 2022, the Court expressed its displeasure with the RAF’s opposition to the application in circumstances where the Minister of Transport did not oppose the granting of the interim order. The Court also granted a punitive costs order against the RAF on account of the “contemptuous attitude” shown by it toward the directives issued by the Court leading up to the hearing of the application. The Court further invited the CEO of the RAF, Mr Collins Letsoalo and its Chairperson, Ms Thembihle Msibi, to file affidavits to explain why they should not be held liable personally to pay the costs.

Despite the granting of the interim interdict on 15 December 2022 and the refusal of the RAF’s application for leave to appeal on 21 February 2023:

 The RAF’s website and social media accounts include no indication to the public of the granting of the interim interdict or that the RAF’s application for leave to appeal has been dismissed.

 The RAF’s website includes the “RAF Medical Tariffs” promulgated on 19 August 2022, despite the operation of those tariffs having been suspended pending the outcome of the review proceedings.

 The RAF has refused to answer the applicants’ letters asking for confirmation that the RAF considers the interim interdict binding while the RAF prosecutes appeals to higher courts.

The LSSA seeks through this media statement to update the public on the current status of the medical tariffs. The position is that by Judge Tolmay’s two judgments, the impugned tariffs are suspended until such time as the future review application has been determined, and they remain suspended despite the RAF’s attempts to lodge an appeal.

The review proceedings are pending and are currently set down to be heard as a special allocation in May 2023.

ISSUED ON BEHALF OF THE PRESIDENT OF THE LAW SOCIETY OF SOUTH AFRICA, MABAENG LENYAI
LSSA Communications:
Mapula Oliphant: [email protected]
Tel: (012) 366 8800 or 076 026 5997

09/03/2022
Dear ReaderPlease send an email to riaan@lawyersa.com or whatsapp to 082 3779427 to order your free sticker.  We print i...
08/05/2021

Dear Reader

Please send an email to [email protected] or whatsapp to 082 3779427 to order your free sticker. We print in batches of 30 stickers and will deliver to you when it is printed.

For more information about our services please visit www.opropsa.com.

Regards
Riaan Oosthuysen

Address

10 Humpata Street, Erasmuskloof Extension 3
Pretoria
0184

Opening Hours

Monday 09:00 - 17:00
Tuesday 09:00 - 17:00
Wednesday 09:00 - 17:00
Thursday 09:00 - 17:00
Friday 09:00 - 17:00

Telephone

+27875511092

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when Opropsa Oosthuysen Att Inc posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Contact The Practice

Send a message to Opropsa Oosthuysen Att Inc:

Share