Ramsay Webber Inc.

Call Directions Website Contact the practice

Ramsay Webber Inc. The firm is a multidisciplinary law practice with a global reach.

📢Please note that we will be moving premises on the 25/26th of June 2026. 📍Physical Address 1 Office B301004, 1st Floor,...
17/06/2026

📢Please note that we will be moving premises on the 25/26th of June 2026.
📍Physical Address 1 Office B301004, 1st Floor, Building 3
Commerce Square, 39 Rivonia Road Corner Melville & Helling Roads, Sandhurst Johannesburg Gauteng 2196
Our telephone/contact numbers remain unchanged - 011
778 0600

Warm wishes for the holiday season🎁🎊🎉OUR OFFICES WILL CLOSE ON THE 17TH DECEMBER 2025 & REOPEN ON THE 5TH JANUARY 2026Fr...
10/12/2025

Warm wishes for the holiday season🎁🎊🎉
OUR OFFICES WILL CLOSE ON THE 17TH DECEMBER 2025 & REOPEN ON THE 5TH JANUARY 2026

From Ramsay Webber

Link in the Bio - ⬆️⬆️⬆️ 12 June 2020 - From 5 March 2020, when filing annual returns, almost all companies must prepare...
24/04/2024

Link in the Bio - ⬆️⬆️⬆️ 12 June 2020 - From 5 March 2020, when filing annual returns, almost all companies must prepare a compliance report, and complete CIPC’s compliance checklist.

A person who knowingly provides false information to the CIPC may be fined or imprisoned for up to 12 months. It is therefore extremely important for directors to carefully consider each of the compliance items and assess compliance.

Link in bio⬆️⬆️⬆️ - Numerous employers establish policies that aim to prevent employees from discussing their salaries w...
14/03/2024

Link in bio⬆️⬆️⬆️ - Numerous employers establish policies that aim to prevent employees from discussing their salaries with peers, justifying such measures by suggesting that these conversations can lead to discontent, negatively impact morale, and, as a result, affect overall productivity. However, it’s critical to understand that these restrictions not only violate principles of transparency, but also unlawfully infringe upon rights protected under sections 78(1)(b) and 79(2)(A) of the Basic Conditions of Employment Act of 1997 (“BCEA”).

Link in bio⬆️⬆️⬆️ - 14th post from the bottom - Under South African law, if it becomes impossible for a party to comply ...
13/02/2024

Link in bio⬆️⬆️⬆️ - 14th post from the bottom - Under South African law, if it becomes impossible for a party to comply with a contract, due to “vis major” (being a direct act of nature which could not reasonably have been foreseen or guarded against), or “casus fortuitus” (being an event having occurred by chance), the contract will terminate by operation of law.

Link in bio⬆️⬆️⬆️ - 13th post from the bottom - In a recent appeal before the Supreme Court, the court was asked to cons...
10/12/2023

Link in bio⬆️⬆️⬆️ - 13th post from the bottom - In a recent appeal before the Supreme Court, the court was asked to consider the basis upon which it may infer a tacit term into a written contract.

Read More (Link In Bio⬆️⬆️⬆️) 11th post from the bottom - In a recent appeal before the Supreme Court, the court was ask...
02/08/2023

Read More (Link In Bio⬆️⬆️⬆️) 11th post from the bottom - In a recent appeal before the Supreme Court, the court was asked to interpret a customary warranty written in a lease. A and B signed a lease in which B warranted that its premises would comply with the applicable health and safety

Read More (Link In Bio⬆️⬆️⬆️) 9th post from the bottom - In a recent appeal before the Supreme Court the court was asked...
08/05/2023

Read More (Link In Bio⬆️⬆️⬆️) 9th post from the bottom - In a recent appeal before the Supreme Court the court was asked to rule on the admissibility of evidence to contradict an express term of a contract and the importation of a tacit term which contradicts an express term.

Read more! Link in bio ⬆️⬆️⬆️- 6 post from the bottom.In a recent appeal before the Supreme Court, the court was called ...
15/01/2023

Read more! Link in bio ⬆️⬆️⬆️- 6 post from the bottom.
In a recent appeal before the Supreme Court, the court was called to rule on the enforceability of agreements forming part of a single transaction.

A obtained a loan from B. B finances SMEs where banks are not willing to undertake the risk. B’s business model is to secure a higher rate of return for its investment. The transaction forming the basis for the loan involved two agreements, namely a loan agreement and a royalty agreement. The obligations of A in terms of the transaction was secured by suretyships signed by various sureties.

Link in the bio⬆️⬆️⬆️ 4th post from the bottom to read more.                                      In a recent appeal bef...
06/12/2022

Link in the bio⬆️⬆️⬆️ 4th post from the bottom to read more. In a recent appeal before the Supreme Court, the court was called to rule on the enforceability of a suretyship agreement.

A and B concluded a sale agreement. Thereafter they concluded a dealer agreement. When the second agreement was concluded C guaranteed A’s obligations to B as a surety. The surety agreement was an annexure to the second agreement.

Address

Second Floor, The Reserve, 54 Melville Road, Illovo
Johannesburg
2196

Opening Hours

Monday 07:30 - 17:00
Tuesday 07:30 - 17:00
Thursday 07:30 - 17:00
Friday 07:30 - 17:00

Telephone

+27117780600

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when Ramsay Webber Inc. posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Contact The Practice

Send a message to Ramsay Webber Inc.:

Shortcuts

Share