24/07/2020
Let us close the Friday well. Let us talk about debt collection and blacklisting by a debt collector. You know this exercise by debt collectors blacklisting the people is incorrect and unconstitutional. I wish somebody can take Blacklisting to the constitutional court for decision by eleven judges of the constitutional court. Eleven brains will decide better. This thing of blacklisting people is rubbish because certain procedures must be followed before blacklisting. The debt collectors are not attorneys and they blacklist people breaking the peoples hearts. I have been trained in blacklisting and I did it for three years spending time in the civil court. The debt collectors blacklist you without telling you and this thing breaks many families. If you blacklist a person, the way I know it, you must issue summons against that person and take judgement against that person, then you can blacklist that person. If a person surfaces after having received the summons, you must follow Section 65 proceedings of the Magistrate Court Act. That person will appear in court and an enquiry will be held and the court will want to find out whether he agrees to the debt and how much can he pay then a form will be completed and signed by the debtor and be made an order of court. This blacklisting story is very detrimental to the consumer and in some instance it breaks the marriages and families for instance a newly wed couple applies for a bond for a house, the other party qualifies and the other party does not qualify because of the blacklisting which will be removed after some time. The clean party more often thinks the other party did not disclose other things to him/her before the marriage and it breaks the moral of the other party and then the love dissipates into thin air and results in divorce. Openness to married parties is very important. This blacklisting is a killing to people, some people cannot get jobs in banks and government posts because of debt collectors who are qualified attorneys, they work with call centres and employ lots of women and men to make calls and earn on commission. The only thing they write is a letter to people who owe and after that its blacklisting without judgement and that is absolute rubbish. They don't have a court order to blacklist you. They collect dead files from the companies and tell them they will collect money for them at a certain percentage and when the file is dead you respond positively and you're cooperative, they call you to their office and you sign an acknowledgement of debt and that is su***de. If you sign an acknowledgement of debt that is the novation of the debt, that is you resuscitate the debt and the debt becomes fresh. By dead file I mean the claim has prescribed (three years has passed) and you cannot even issue summons, it's a dead matter. So don't agree to that exercise. If judgement is granted in a civil court and you want your name to be clean, so that you can get credit, you have to apply for rescission of judgement and you have to have consent of the attorneys who blacklisted you that they won't oppose the application in court because you have satisfied the judgement debt by paying or agreeing to pay installment and they trust you after some payments made. That letter they sent you of not opposing the application forms part of your application for rescission of judgement as you mention in your affidavit as an annexure. In most instances when there is such a letter in the application, the court grants the rescission judgement. The magistrate can unilaterally refuse to grant the rescission judgement depending on other things mentioned in the application but it doesn't happen in most cases. Once the application for rescission is granted by the court the file goes to the typing clerk who types the court order, then you uplift the court order and go to places like transunion where you are blacklisted, give them the court order and they remove your name. This debt collection companies, I don't know how they blacklist you because they destroy some people's lives. Number two. let us talk about abbreviated summons in a divorce case. Parties must be very careful of their partners in the marriage. Some other parties in a marriage are dishonest taking advantage that the other party are not learned and are not reading the newspapers and they take advantage of that. People pretend as if the marriage is blissful whereas it is not, the other party is planning for you and you are sharing the same bed. This happens mostly, according to my experience, to people working for the government such as teachers, nurses etc. It is sad that I was involved in such divorce cases and I felt bad but I was acting on instructions and i had to carry out the mandate but I felt bad after the divorces were granted. These government employees they qualify for the bond alone and they want to get rid of the husband or the wife because the poor person can't afford the bond because he/she is unemployed or for some other reasons. They are still wearing the beautiful rings and pretend to be happy whereas the other party is no longer interested in the marriage because of the benefits he/she has or has another relationship elsewhere and is trying to get rid of the marriage, poor children who love both parents are affected. For instance the nurse will come to you with instructions to institute the divorce proceedings against the husband, she will state flimsy reasons such as he doesn't want to work, insubordinate, lack of communication and incompatibility etc. Once a person starts stating reasons like these you sit back and listen carefully because you can see there are no concrete reasons for the divorce. Then that person will tell you he is not sleeping at home, he has left the home and took his clothes. The next step you take is the service of the summons, then you instruct the sheriff to serve the summons on the poor husband and she knows that the husband is not always there. She knows that there is somebody in the house like a domestic worker and she's given specific instructions to tell the sheriff that this poor husband is no longer staying there, his whereabouts are unknown. First and second attempts by the sheriff are made to serve the summons on fake addresses. The sheriff sends you the return of none service meaning that the husband is untraceable whereas he is making love with the wife. The next step of your instructions is abbreviated summons. You prepare an application to court that the husband is untraceable, his whereabouts are are unknown whereas he is sleeping in that house, the wife signs an affidavit with false contents that the husband is unknown and by signing that affidavit you are committing a criminal offence of perjury. The court gives an order that you can serve summons by publication in the newspaper, the abbreviated summons is published in the newspapers like The Star and it is unlikely that the husband/family member can read the newspaper because they never went to school. That publication stays for a certain time or thirty days in the newspapers. Then after publication the Newspaper sends you abbreviated summons and you prepare a filing sheet and file them in court and apply for trial date. Whereas the poor husband does not know, date is given and the wife goes to court and lie under oath in the witness stand with the same set of facts because evidence must be led for the presiding officer who is the magistrate and divorce is granted. She applies for the bond and the bond is granted without your knowledge. She views the houses without your knowledge and signs the transfer documents in the transferring attorneys offices who are conveyancers and that false degree forms part of the transferring document bond is registered. When the bond is registered she starts a fight in the house and she leaves the house unceremoniously saying she got another place and that is the end of your marriage, she'll never come back to you. So be careful with your marriage, always check with the Home Affairs if you're still married but presently the magistrates are aware of these things and they want the tracers report in the file before they grant the application. Poor husband is left in the lurch by his beautiful wife and he can't apply for rescission of judgement because he does not have money and it is useless to do so because this person doesn't love you anymore. NEXT WEEK I WILL DISCUSS ABOUT THE ENDORSEMENT OF THE PENSION FUND, HOW IT WORKS AND WHEN IS IT APPLIED AND IT'S UNFAIRNESS. THAT IS THE END FOR THE WEEK.