11/12/2017
The main benefit that a joint search for a win-win solution (eg. via mediation) has over a win-lose (often lose-lose!) process, is that it creates room for out-of-the-box-thinking.
After the fall of Sadam Hussein in Iraq, displaced farmers in the south of the country formed a cooperative to lease arable land from the government. They used their savings to plant crops. Only a few months later oil was discovered there and they were ordered to immediately vacate the land, in line with the fine print of their lease. The farmers refused to leave. The oil company had the law on its side and when their threats had no effect, the army was called in. Bloodshed was averted at the last moment when a mediator was called in and the real interests of the parties were uncovered. It appeared that oil production would only commence in three years’ time and therefore the current crops could be harvested without posing a problem. Furthermore, the oil company wanted to hire many of the farmers during the construction phase. After proper consideration, it also appeared that crops in between the oil derricks would be acceptable to the oil company.
It sounds so easy. However, as long as parties remain locked into positions (focussing on rights and obligations), their minds remain in-the-box.