28/09/2015
PINK PROPERTY
DEFECTS IN A PROPERTY
If you are buying a brand new property which has just been constructed from a developer, The Consumer Protection Act grants you protection and various remedies available to you if you discover defects in the property. However these remedies are not available to you if you buy an existing house or flat from a private owner (unless such person deals in property regularly), which is the more common situation which I want to canvas briefly in this article.
The usual sale agreement in such a situation would normally contain a clause stipulating that the property is sold “voetstoots as it now stands”. At this point, we need to differentiate between latent and patent defects. A latent defect is a fault that would not be apparent if there was a reasonable inspection, whereas patent defects are defects that are not hidden and should easily be noticed by a reasonable inspection.
The voetstoots clause affords protection to a seller for patent defects. For example, it there are cracked or broken windows or a hole in the floor that is not hidden by a carpet. These are patently visible in a normal viewing and unless a clause in the sale agreement is inserted stating that the seller is liable to repair such defects, the purchaser acquires the property with such defects “as is.”
An example of latent defects would be a roof that leaks during heavy rain or damp in the walls which is visible as it has been painted over. A seller is not liable for the cost of repairing such items if he or she was not aware of them. Many a dispute has gone to court when a purchaser has sued a seller for latent defects in a property. The onus is on the purchaser to prove that the seller knew or must have known about the defects at the time of the sale and deliberately withheld the information or failed to disclose it. This can be difficult to prove, but if the purchaser succeeds in doing so, the seller will be liable.
No warranty, representation or undertaking to repair is of any force or effect unless contained in writing and signed by the parties to a sale agreement. In other words, a verbal assurance from a seller or agent that the roof has never leaked or that the seller will remedy a damp problem before the transfer takes place, is not enforceable. It is essential that such undertaking or warranty is inserted under “special conditions” in the sale agreement. Conversely, if you are a seller, it is recommended that you disclose any defects in the property that you are aware of in the sale agreement and that these are brought to the attention of your purchaser before you sign in order to avoid any disputes or litigation.
2.
A standard sale agreement stipulates that a seller has to furnish compliance certificates from accredited contractors for the following prior to registration of transfer and to pay for any repairs necessary for the issue of such certificates:
• Electrical Compliance;
• Plumbing/water compliance;
• Beetle Free Certificates (Cape Town only and only for certifiable beetle);
• Gas (when there is piped gas/appliances);
• Electric Fences.
These compliance certificates, some of which have only become standard in recent years, grant significant protection to purchasers against expensive hidden defects but it is still a good idea to have a property inspected by an expert for other hidden defects before signing on the dotted line.
________________________
Graham Sonnenberg is an attorney practising independently in Green Point and specialising in property, conveyancing, wills and estates, tel 021 4397709, e mail [email protected]
PINK PROPERTY
DEFECTS IN A PROPERTY
If you are buying a brand new property which has just been constructed from a developer, The Consumer Protection Act grants you protection and various remedies available to you if you discover defects in the property. However these remedies are not available to you if you buy an existing house or flat from a private owner (unless such person deals in property regularly), which is the more common situation which I want to canvas briefly in this article.
The usual sale agreement in such a situation would normally contain a clause stipulating that the property is sold “voetstoots as it now stands”. At this point, we need to differentiate between latent and patent defects. A latent defect is a fault that would not be apparent if there was a reasonable inspection, whereas patent defects are defects that are not hidden and should easily be noticed by a reasonable inspection.
The voetstoots clause affords protection to a seller for patent defects. For example, it there are cracked or broken windows or a hole in the floor that is not hidden by a carpet. These are patently visible in a normal viewing and unless a clause in the sale agreement is inserted stating that the seller is liable to repair such defects, the purchaser acquires the property with such defects “as is.”
An example of latent defects would be a roof that leaks during heavy rain or damp in the walls which is visible as it has been painted over. A seller is not liable for the cost of repairing such items if he or she was not aware of them. Many a dispute has gone to court when a purchaser has sued a seller for latent defects in a property. The onus is on the purchaser to prove that the seller knew or must have known about the defects at the time of the sale and deliberately withheld the information or failed to disclose it. This can be difficult to prove, but if the purchaser succeeds in doing so, the seller will be liable.
No warranty, representation or undertaking to repair is of any force or effect unless contained in writing and signed by the parties to a sale agreement. In other words, a verbal assurance from a seller or agent that the roof has never leaked or that the seller will remedy a damp problem before the transfer takes place, is not enforceable. It is essential that such undertaking or warranty is inserted under “special conditions” in the sale agreement. Conversely, if you are a seller, it is recommended that you disclose any defects in the property that you are aware of in the sale agreement and that these are brought to the attention of your purchaser before you sign in order to avoid any disputes or litigation.
2.
A standard sale agreement stipulates that a seller has to furnish compliance certificates from accredited contractors for the following prior to registration of transfer and to pay for any repairs necessary for the issue of such certificates:
• Electrical Compliance;
• Plumbing/water compliance;
• Beetle Free Certificates (Cape Town only and only for certifiable beetle);
• Gas (when there is piped gas/appliances);
• Electric Fences.
These compliance certificates, some of which have only become standard in recent years, grant significant protection to purchasers against expensive hidden defects but it is still a good idea to have a property inspected by an expert for other hidden defects before signing on the dotted line.
________________________
Graham Sonnenberg is an attorney practising independently in Green Point and specialising in property, conveyancing, wills and estates, tel 021 4397709, e mail [email protected]
DEFECTS IN A PROPERTY
If you are buying a brand new property which has just been constructed from a developer, The Consumer Protection Act grants you protection and various remedies available to you if you discover defects in the property. However these remedies are not available to you if you buy an existing house or flat from a private owner (unless such person deals in property regularly), which is the more common situation which I want to canvas briefly in this article.
The usual sale agreement in such a situation would normally contain a clause stipulating that the property is sold “voetstoots as it now stands”. At this point, we need to differentiate between latent and patent defects. A latent defect is a fault that would not be apparent if there was a reasonable inspection, whereas patent defects are defects that are not hidden and should easily be noticed by a reasonable inspection.
The voetstoots clause affords protection to a seller for patent defects. For example, it there are cracked or broken windows or a hole in the floor that is not hidden by a carpet. These are patently visible in a normal viewing and unless a clause in the sale agreement is inserted stating that the seller is liable to repair such defects, the purchaser acquires the property with such defects “as is.”
An example of latent defects would be a roof that leaks during heavy rain or damp in the walls which is visible as it has been painted over. A seller is not liable for the cost of repairing such items if he or she was not aware of them. Many a dispute has gone to court when a purchaser has sued a seller for latent defects in a property. The onus is on the purchaser to prove that the seller knew or must have known about the defects at the time of the sale and deliberately withheld the information or failed to disclose it. This can be difficult to prove, but if the purchaser succeeds in doing so, the seller will be liable.
No warranty, representation or undertaking to repair is of any force or effect unless contained in writing and signed by the parties to a sale agreement. In other words, a verbal assurance from a seller or agent that the roof has never leaked or that the seller will remedy a damp problem before the transfer takes place, is not enforceable. It is essential that such undertaking or warranty is inserted under “special conditions” in the sale agreement. Conversely, if you are a seller, it is recommended that you disclose any defects in the property that you are aware of in the sale agreement and that these are brought to the attention of your purchaser before you sign in order to avoid any disputes or litigation.
2.
A standard sale agreement stipulates that a seller has to furnish compliance certificates from accredited contractors for the following prior to registration of transfer and to pay for any repairs necessary for the issue of such certificates:
• Electrical Compliance;
• Plumbing/water compliance;
• Beetle Free Certificates (Cape Town only and only for certifiable beetle);
• Gas (when there is piped gas/appliances);
• Electric Fences.
These compliance certificates, some of which have only become standard in recent years, grant significant protection to purchasers against expensive hidden defects but it is still a good idea to have a property inspected by an expert for other hidden defects before signing on the dotted line.
________________________
Graham Sonnenberg is an attorney practising independently in Green Point and specialising in property, conveyancing, wills and estates, tel 021 4397709, e mail [email protected]