17/09/2026
Can an employer dismiss an employee for something they did after hours, in their own car and on their own time?
WATCH THE VIDEO
https://youtube.com/watch?v=EYsS6ARIecI&utm_source=facebook&utm%5C_medium=social&utm%5C_campaign=What+if+Drunk+Driving
LISTEN TO THE PODCAST
https://open.spotify.com/episode/4Bjmc4ETwmwWCKYM4v9A9h?si=IqoFS7NKSf64hvANNQGXKQ
In this discussion of our "What if" series, we unpack the recent Labour Court judgment in IMATU obo Sauls v City of Cape Town & Others.
A Learner Law Enforcement Officer was arrested for driving under the influence while off duty and was dismissed. At arbitration, the commissioner upheld the dismissal, finding that his job title alone linked his off-duty conduct to his employment. The Labour Court disagreed. It found the dismissal substantively unfair and reinstated him retrospectively. In June 2026, the Court also refused the City leave to appeal.
In this discussion:
✓ Why off-duty conduct can justify dismissal only where there is a genuine link (nexus) to the employer's operations
✓ Why a job title alone is not enough, even for a law enforcement officer
✓ How the City's handling of a comparable case undermined its position
✓ Why speculation cannot be an aggravating factor, and why a completed conversion programme counts in mitigation
Key takeaways for employers and HR practitioners:
✓ Show, with evidence, how the conduct affects your operations or the employee's ability to do the job. If off-duty conduct matters for certain roles, deal with it expressly in your disciplinary code or policy.
✓ Be consistent. Accepting a lesser outcome in a comparable case will count against you in the next one.
✓ Decide each charge on its own merits, and base aggravating factors on evidence, not speculation.
✓ Give proper weight to mitigating factors before deciding on dismissal.
📄 Read the judgment: https://www.saflii.org/za/cases/ZALCCT/2026/10.html
📄 Leave to appeal judgment: https://www.saflii.org/za/cases/ZALCCT/2026/90.html