11/06/2026
Is the question presented in the Tayam petition justiciable? or a political one?. Here's my take as a lawyer. The question presented in the Tayam petition involves the determination of quorum in the recent session of Senate (June 03, 2026) where 12 senators were present and declared the existence of quorum to proceed with its regular legislative agenda, and going as far as declaring vacant the membership of Senate committees and the Office of the Senate President.
The petition raised the question whether the 12 senators present on that session day constituted a quorum?. This alone would necessarily call for the interpretation of the Constitution which is a question of law, therefore, a justiciable one.
The dismissal of the petition was based on the lack of legal standing of the petitioner and not on the fact whether the question raised therein is a political question. Such determination falls within the realm of the high court's expanded power of judicial review to curtail the abuses of the executive and legislative branch of the government on justifying their official acts as one of political question, hence, beyond the reach of the courts.
MARAMING NANGANGARAP?
Binigyang-diin ni Sen. Tito Sotto na ang petisyong inihain sa Korte Suprema na kumukuwestiyon sa quorum ng Senado ay “not justiciable,” kaya wala na umanong dahilan para dinggin pa ito ng hukuman.
Ang pahayag na ito ay kasunod ng pagbasura ng Korte Suprema sa petisyon ni John Barry T. Tayam nitong Hunyo 10, 2026.