Greg Jones Law

Directions Website Contact the practice

Greg Jones Law Winning is NO accident! - Trust our knowledgeable personal injury attorneys. We serve clients with conveniently located offices in Wilmington and Jacksonville.

Greg Jones Law (Greg Jones & Associates, PA) provides powerful representation for personal injury cases in North Carolina, South Carolina, Georgia and Texas. Highly skilled representation, our personal injury lawyers approach cases aggressively and have no second thoughts about going to trial. Sometimes courtroom litigation is necessary to achieve favorable outcomes on behalf of our clients. Our firm devotes an entire department to dealing solely with personal injury claims litigation, often handling complex cases. Cutting-edge technology that includes media conferences, Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP), and sophisticated case management software allow us to provide convincing courtroom presentations. We handle cases in a number of complicated areas such as asbestos and pharmaceutical litigation that require highly technical and expert medical evaluation. Yet, the range of personal injury cases we handle is broad, including: Injuries and accidents, Car accidents, trucking accidents, motorcycle accidents, premises liability, dog bites, dangerous drugs and medical devices, failed hip and knee replacements, severe side effects or birth defects from prescribed medications nursing home negligence, bedsores, malnutrition, falls, abuse, Mesothelioma, Asbestos-related cancer, long-term disability claims, bad faith lawsuits and coverage litigation, Workers' compensation, North Carolina work injury benefits and settlements Social Security Disability, Appeals of denied claims for physical or mental impairments.

08/20/2026

What Medical Care Do Stevens Johnson Syndrome Survivors Need Long-Term?

https://bit.ly/45Z8Y6a | (855) 566-3752

What Medical Care Do Stevens Johnson Syndrome Survivors Need Long-Term?

You Left the Hospital. But SJS Did Not Leave You. Here Is What Long-Term SJS Care Actually Looks Like — and Why It Changes Your Case Value

The day an SJS survivor is discharged from the hospital is not the end of the medical journey. For many survivors, the discharge date marks the beginning of a years-long, sometimes lifelong relationship with specialists across multiple medical disciplines. And the full picture of that ongoing care is one of the most important elements of building a complete SJS legal case.

Ophthalmological care is frequently the most intensive long-term need. Chronic dry eye syndrome following SJS can require specialized eye drops, amniotic membrane transplants, rigid scleral contact lenses, and in some cases multiple surgical interventions to manage scarring and prevent vision loss progression. A study published in the American Journal of Ophthalmology found that a meaningful percentage of SJS survivors require ongoing ophthalmological procedures years and decades after the acute episode.

Pulmonary follow-up is necessary for survivors who developed respiratory involvement during the acute phase. Dermatological care addresses chronic skin sensitivity, abnormal pigmentation, and nail abnormalities. Gynecological and urological complications resulting from mucosal scarring require specialist management in affected survivors.

Psychological care is perhaps the most overlooked component of long-term SJS management. Research has consistently documented elevated rates of PTSD, major depression, and anxiety disorders in SJS survivor populations. The psychological impact of a near-death illness involving loss of skin, hospitalization, pain, and the permanent alteration of physical appearance is profound and documented.

Here is why this matters directly to the legal case: a life care plan — prepared by qualified medical and economic experts — translates this ongoing care into concrete projected future costs. For a young survivor with decades of care ahead, the future medical cost component of damages can be one of the largest elements of the total claim. Our firm works with the best life care planners and medical economists in the country.

If you are an SJS survivor managing ongoing medical needs, please call us. Your case may be worth significantly more than you have been told.

We offer 100% free consultations by calling 855-566-3752 or you can visit us online at https://bit.ly/45Z8Y6a

Note: This is informational only and not a substitute for medical or legal advice.

What Medical Care Do Stevens Johnson Syndrome Survivors Need Long-Term?



"Nothing in this video, or in links provided in the description of this video, constitutes legal advice or the practice of law. Nor does viewing this page form an attorney/client relationship between you and any Lawyer at our law firm. All visitors should consult with a qualified legal professional regarding their individual questions, needs, or issues that may be of concern. We are not responsible for any action taken by a reader based upon any information in this video. All of the content in this video is for general informational and educational purposes only."

08/20/2026

What Should You Do After a Diagnosis of Stevens Johnson Syndrome to Protect Your Legal Rights?

https://bit.ly/45Z8Y6a | (855) 566-3752

What Should You Do After a Diagnosis of Stevens Johnson Syndrome to Protect Your Legal Rights?

You Just Got the Diagnosis. Here Is the List of Things Our Team Wishes Every SJS Patient Knew From the Very Beginning

If you or someone you love has just been diagnosed with Stevens Johnson Syndrome — or is still in the acute phase of treatment — the legal process is probably the last thing on your mind. That is completely understandable. Medical survival comes first.

But there are things that matter legally, that are time-sensitive, and that our team wants you to know about as early as possible — because taking a few simple steps now can make an enormous difference in the strength of a legal case later.

First: preserve all medication packaging, prescription bottles, and any paperwork related to the prescription. Do not throw away the medication, the box, or the pharmacy receipt. These are evidence. The lot number, the manufacturer, the dispensing date — all of it matters.

Second: document everything. Photographs of skin conditions at various stages of the illness. A written journal of symptoms from the day they first appeared, the medical facilities visited, and the treatments received. Names of every physician, specialist, and nurse involved in care.

Third: request complete medical records from every treating facility as soon as you are able. In the immediate aftermath of hospitalization, medical records from the acute phase are most accessible. Emergency department records, ICU records, nursing notes, ophthalmology consultations — all of this is relevant.

Fourth: do not speak with representatives of the drug manufacturer or their insurance carriers without consulting an attorney first. If anyone contacts you in the weeks following a diagnosis in connection with the medication, please call us immediately before responding.

Statutes of limitations in product liability and medical malpractice cases mean that legal rights can expire. The timeline varies but it is real. Consulting with an experienced SJS attorney early — even while you are still in active medical treatment — is never too soon.

Our team has guided SJS families through this process for decades. Please call us. The first conversation is free, confidential, and you will leave it knowing exactly where you stand.

We offer 100% free consultations by calling 855-566-3752 or you can visit us online at https://bit.ly/45Z8Y6a

Note: This is informational only and not a substitute for medical or legal advice.

What Should You Do After a Diagnosis of Stevens Johnson Syndrome to Protect Your Legal Rights?



"Nothing in this video, or in links provided in the description of this video, constitutes legal advice or the practice of law. Nor does viewing this page form an attorney/client relationship between you and any Lawyer at our law firm. All visitors should consult with a qualified legal professional regarding their individual questions, needs, or issues that may be of concern. We are not responsible for any action taken by a reader based upon any information in this video. All of the content in this video is for general informational and educational purposes only."

08/15/2026

What Evidence Is Needed to Win an Institutional Sexual Abuse Case?

https://bit.ly/45Z8Y6a | (855) 566-3752

What Evidence Is Needed to Win an Institutional Sexual Abuse Case?

You Are Afraid You Cannot Prove What Happened — Here Is What Our Team Has Seen Actually Win These Cases

One of the most common fears that institutional sexual abuse survivors bring to their first conversation with our team is the belief that they cannot win because it is their word against the institution's. This fear is understandable. It is also, in our experience, frequently incorrect.

Institutional sexual abuse cases are not solely dependent on the survivor's testimony — though that testimony, when presented by a skilled legal team that has prepared the survivor properly, is powerful and often sufficient. There is frequently a substantial body of other evidence available.

Personnel records: employment files, disciplinary records, termination records, and resignation letters can reveal prior complaints or incidents that the institution is aware of. These records often do not surface unless specifically requested through the legal discovery process — which is one of the most important reasons to have experienced legal counsel.

Complaints from other survivors: in many institutional abuse cases, what happened to one survivor happened to others. Our team's investigations have frequently uncovered other survivors whose experiences corroborate and contextualize the evidence.

Communications: emails, internal memos, HR reports, and communications between institutional leadership in the aftermath of complaints can reveal that decision-makers knew — and chose institutional protection over survivor protection.

Expert testimony: psychologists and trauma experts can speak to the documented patterns of grooming, the predictable impact of trauma on disclosure timing, and the consistency between a survivor's behavioral patterns and the established research on abuse victims.

The National Sexual Violence Resource Center has noted that false reporting rates for sexual assault are estimated at 2 to 10 percent — roughly comparable to false reporting rates for other crimes. Most survivors are telling the truth.

Our team has built these cases for decades. We know how to find the evidence. Please call us and let us show you what your case might look like.

We offer 100% free consultations by calling 855-566-3752 or you can visit us online at https://bit.ly/45Z8Y6a

Note: This is informational only and not a substitute for medical or legal advice.

What Evidence Is Needed to Win an Institutional Sexual Abuse Case?

08/15/2026

Is Failure to Get Informed Consent Related to Stevens Johnson Syndrome a Basis for a Lawsuit?

https://bit.ly/45Z8Y6a | (855) 566-3752

Is Failure to Get Informed Consent Related to Stevens Johnson Syndrome a Basis for a Lawsuit?

Your Doctor Never Mentioned SJS as a Possible Risk. Here Is Why That Silence Might Matter Legally

Informed consent is a foundational principle of medical ethics and medical law. Before a physician prescribes a medication that carries significant risk, the patient has a legal and ethical right to receive enough information to make a genuinely informed decision about whether to take that medication.

For medications with a known association with Stevens Johnson Syndrome — particularly those where the risk is documented in the labeling, where genetic risk factors exist that could have been screened for, or where safer alternatives may have been available — the informed consent question becomes directly relevant to SJS litigation.

An informed consent claim in an SJS case asks: was the patient told, in terms they could understand, that this medication carries a risk of a serious, potentially life-threatening skin reaction? Was the patient told about the symptoms to watch for and what to do if they appeared? Was the patient told, where relevant, that a genetic test existed that could identify elevated personal risk?

Research published in medical ethics literature has consistently found that patients value autonomy in medical decision-making — the ability to weigh the benefits of a medication against its risks for themselves. When a medication's risk includes something as severe as SJS, many patients, if properly informed, might ask questions, request monitoring, explore alternatives, or in some cases decline. They were denied that choice when the risk was not communicated.

Informed consent claims in SJS cases are often pursued alongside failure to warn and product liability claims. Together, they paint a complete picture of the multiple points at which a patient's safety could have been protected and was not.

Our team has pursued informed consent and failure to warn claims in SJS cases for decades. If your physician did not discuss SJS risk with you before prescribing the drug that triggered your reaction, please call us. This is a meaningful part of your potential case.

We offer 100% free consultations by calling 855-566-3752 or you can visit us online at https://bit.ly/45Z8Y6a

Note: This is informational only and not a substitute for medical or legal advice.

Is Failure to Get Informed Consent Related to Stevens Johnson Syndrome a Basis for a Lawsuit?



"Nothing in this video, or in links provided in the description of this video, constitutes legal advice or the practice of law. Nor does viewing this page form an attorney/client relationship between you and any Lawyer at our law firm. All visitors should consult with a qualified legal professional regarding their individual questions, needs, or issues that may be of concern. We are not responsible for any action taken by a reader based upon any information in this video. All of the content in this video is for general informational and educational purposes only."

08/07/2026

Can an Employer Be Held Liable for Institutional Sexual Assault or Harassment in the Workplace?

https://bit.ly/45Z8Y6a | (855) 566-3752

Can an Employer Be Held Liable for Institutional Sexual Assault or Harassment in the Workplace?

Your Employer Knew. They Had Received Complaints Before Yours. Here Is Why Their Inaction Created Your Case

Workplace sexual assault and sexual harassment represent a form of institutional abuse that occurs in a setting where most adults spend the majority of their waking hours — and where power dynamics can create exactly the conditions that predatory behavior requires to flourish.

An employer can be held legally responsible for sexual assault and harassment in the workplace under several theories. Direct liability applies when a supervisor or manager — someone with institutional authority — perpetrates the assault. Under established employment law principles, an employer is vicariously liable for a supervisor's harassment that results in a tangible employment action.

Negligence liability applies when the employer knew or should have known about the hostile or dangerous environment and failed to take reasonable corrective action. This is the theory that most directly targets institutional failures — the HR department that buried complaints, the manager who shielded a colleague, the institution that valued reputation over the safety of its employees.

The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) processes tens of thousands of sexual harassment charges each year. According to the EEOC, in recent years the agency has received between 7,000 and 12,000 charges involving sexual harassment annually — and these numbers represent only those who formally filed with the agency. The organization has documented that underreporting of workplace sexual harassment is significant.

Here is something that rarely gets discussed publicly: many workplace sexual assault survivors do not know that they can pursue a civil lawsuit alongside or in addition to an EEOC administrative complaint. Civil litigation allows for discovery of internal documents — complaint records, HR files, prior disciplinary records — that can reveal exactly what the institution knew and when.

Our firm has represented workplace sexual assault survivors for decades. If your employer failed to protect you, please call us. You have rights.

We offer 100% free consultations by calling 855-566-3752 or you can visit us online at https://bit.ly/45Z8Y6a

Note: This is informational only and not a substitute for medical or legal advice.

Can an Employer Be Held Liable for Institutional Sexual Assault or Harassment in the Workplace?

"Nothing in this video, or in links provided in the description of this video, constitutes legal advice or the practice of law. Nor does viewing this page form an attorney/client relationship between you and any Lawyer at our law firm. All visitors should consult with a qualified legal professional regarding their individual questions, needs, or issues that may be of concern. We are not responsible for any action taken by a reader based upon any information in this video. All of the content in this video is for general informational and educational purposes only."

08/06/2026

What Is a Failure to Warn Claim in a Stevens Johnson Syndrome Lawsuit?

https://bit.ly/45Z8Y6a | (855) 566-3752

What Is a Failure to Warn Claim in a Stevens Johnson Syndrome Lawsuit?

The Warning Was on the Label — But Was It Actually Enough? Here Is the Legal Standard That Matters

A failure to warn claim is the most common legal theory in Stevens Johnson Syndrome cases, and understanding how it works is essential for any SJS survivor or family member trying to understand whether they have a viable case.

In pharmaceutical product liability law, drug manufacturers have an ongoing duty to warn both prescribing physicians and patients about the known risks associated with their medications. This duty is not satisfied just by putting something somewhere on the label. The warning must be adequate — meaning it must convey the risk in a way that is clear, prominent, and reflective of the actual weight of the safety evidence.

The "learned intermediary doctrine" applies in most prescription drug cases — meaning the manufacturer's primary duty is to warn the prescribing physician, who then has the duty to counsel the patient. But this doctrine does not insulate manufacturers from liability when the warning provided to the physician was itself inadequate, or when direct-to-consumer advertising or marketing bypassed the physician's role as intermediary.

The FDA's adverse event reporting system (FAERS) is the national database that is supposed to surface safety signals over time. When reports of SJS reactions accumulate around a particular drug, the manufacturer has regulatory obligations to evaluate and, if warranted, update their labeling. When they are slow to act on those signals — when the data was there but the label did not change, or changed too slowly, or changed in language too vague to actually guide clinical decision-making — that is the core of a failure to warn claim.

Our team has pursued failure to warn claims against drug manufacturers in SJS cases for decades. We know how to obtain and analyze FAERS data, internal company communications, and the regulatory history of specific drugs. If you were not adequately warned about your SJS risk, please call us. One conversation, at no cost, can tell you whether you have a claim.

We offer 100% free consultations by calling 855-566-3752 or you can visit us online at https://bit.ly/45Z8Y6a

Note: This is informational only and not a substitute for medical or legal advice.

What Is a Failure to Warn Claim in a Stevens Johnson Syndrome Lawsuit?

"Nothing in this video, or in links provided in the description of this video, constitutes legal advice or the practice of law. Nor does viewing this page form an attorney/client relationship between you and any Lawyer at our law firm. All visitors should consult with a qualified legal professional regarding their individual questions, needs, or issues that may be of concern. We are not responsible for any action taken by a reader based upon any information in this video. All of the content in this video is for general informational and educational purposes only."

08/06/2026

Why Do Survivors of Institutional Sexual Abuse Often Wait Years Before Coming Forward?

https://bit.ly/45Z8Y6a | (855) 566-3752

Why Do Survivors of Institutional Sexual Abuse Often Wait Years Before Coming Forward?

You Did Not Report It for 20 Years. Here Is Why That Is Completely Understandable — and Why It Does Not Necessarily Disqualify Your Case

This is a question that our team has answered — gently, carefully, and honestly — more times than we can count over our decades of representing institutional sexual abuse survivors. And it is a question that deserves a direct, respectful answer.

Survivors of childhood sexual abuse — and adults abused in institutional settings — delay disclosure for many reasons that the research on trauma and memory has documented thoroughly.

Shame, which is almost universally present and almost universally misplaced — the abuse was not the survivor's fault, but survivors are frequently made to feel that it was. Fear of not being believed, which is not irrational given the historic rate at which survivors were disbelieved by institutions, family members, and even law enforcement. Fear of retaliation from a powerful institution. The psychological phenomenon of dissociation, in which traumatic memories are not fully processed or accessible. The fact that child abuse survivors were, by definition, children at the time — with a child's limited understanding of what had happened to them and a child's dependency on the very adults who may have caused or enabled the harm.

Research published in the journal Child Abuse and Neglect has documented that the average time between the onset of childhood sexual abuse and first disclosure is approximately seven to ten years. RAINN data suggests that only about one-third of sexual assaults are ever reported to police — and for institutional childhood sexual abuse, the reporting rate is lower still.

Here is what matters legally: in civil courts, the question is not whether you reported promptly. The question is whether you are within the legally available window to bring a claim. And as we discussed in an earlier post, those windows have expanded significantly in many jurisdictions.

If you are a survivor who waited — whatever your reason — please call us. Our team has been in this work for a long time. We will not judge you. We will listen, and we will tell you honestly where you stand.

We offer 100% free consultations by calling 855-566-3752 or you can visit us online at https://bit.ly/45Z8Y6a

Note: This is informational only and not a substitute for medical or legal advice.

Why Do Survivors of Institutional Sexual Abuse Often Wait Years Before Coming Forward?

"Nothing in this video, or in links provided in the description of this video, constitutes legal advice or the practice of law. Nor does viewing this page form an attorney/client relationship between you and any Lawyer at our law firm. All visitors should consult with a qualified legal professional regarding their individual questions, needs, or issues that may be of concern. We are not responsible for any action taken by a reader based upon any information in this video. All of the content in this video is for general informational and educational purposes only."

Why Do Survivors of Institutional Sexual Abuse Often Wait Years Before Coming Forward?

08/05/2026

Can Common Pain Medications Like Ibuprofen or Naproxen Cause Stevens Johnson Syndrome?

https://bit.ly/45Z8Y6a | (855) 566-3752

Can Common Pain Medications Like Ibuprofen or Naproxen Cause Stevens Johnson Syndrome?

You Were Treating a Headache or a Sprain. Here Is What Families Need to Know About NSAIDs and Serious Skin Reactions

Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs — NSAIDs — are among the most commonly used medications in the world. Ibuprofen and naproxen sodium in particular are available without a prescription and are taken by millions of people every day for pain, inflammation, and fever. They are in medicine cabinets, gym bags, and purses across the country.

And they appear in SJS adverse event literature.

NSAIDs as a class are documented in the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System and in peer-reviewed SJS case series as drug triggers for serious cutaneous adverse reactions. The frequency is lower than with certain antibiotics or anti-seizure medications — but it is not zero, and for the individuals and families for whom it is not zero, that statistical distinction means nothing.

The FDA in 2013 issued a Drug Safety Communication specifically requiring updated labeling for all prescription and OTC NSAIDs to address the risk of serious skin reactions. The communication noted that these reactions can occur without warning and can be fatal, and that patients should discontinue use and seek medical attention immediately if they develop any skin rash.

Here is the legal issue: the adequacy of that warning — its placement, its language, its prominence — is exactly what our team evaluates in these cases. An OTC medication that sits on a pharmacy shelf with a label a consumer might not read carefully, or a warning embedded in a small-print insert, raises real questions about whether the risk was communicated in a way that was reasonably likely to reach and inform the consumer.

Product liability law requires that warnings be adequate — not just present. There is a meaningful legal difference between a warning that exists somewhere and a warning that actually informs.

If an NSAID triggered your SJS, please call our team. We will evaluate the specific facts of your case with decades of SJS legal experience behind us.

We offer 100% free consultations by calling 855-566-3752 or you can visit us online at https://bit.ly/45Z8Y6a

Note: This is informational only and not a substitute for medical or legal advice.

Can Common Pain Medications Like Ibuprofen or Naproxen Cause Stevens Johnson Syndrome?

"Nothing in this video, or in links provided in the description of this video, constitutes legal advice or the practice of law. Nor does viewing this page form an attorney/client relationship between you and any Lawyer at our law firm. All visitors should consult with a qualified legal professional regarding their individual questions, needs, or issues that may be of concern. We are not responsible for any action taken by a reader based upon any information in this video. All of the content in this video is for general informational and educational purposes only."

07/23/2026

Can Parents Sue Video Game Companies for Addiction That Harmed Their Child?

https://bit.ly/45Z8Y6a | (855) 566-3752

Can Parents Sue Video Game Companies for Addiction That Harmed Their Child?

The Game Was Rated T for Teen. Your Teen Has Not Left His Room in Months. Here Is Where the Law Currently Stands

The question of legal accountability for video game addiction in minors is one of the most actively developing areas in personal injury law right now. And families dealing with the devastating reality of a child or teenager whose life has been consumed by compulsive gaming deserve to know what is being pursued in courts and what the legal arguments actually look like.

The core legal theory in video game addiction cases against game developers and publishers is not that playing video games causes addiction in every player. It is that specific, identifiable game design mechanics were deliberately engineered to maximize compulsive engagement — particularly in vulnerable users including minors — in ways that the developers knew created addiction risk.

Those mechanics include loot box systems that function similarly to slot machine gambling mechanics. Variable reward schedules designed to maximize dopamine-driven behavioral loops. Social pressure and fear-of-missing-out mechanics tied to time-limited events. Progress systems designed to make stopping feel like a loss. Research published in journals including JAMA Pediatrics has examined these mechanics and their behavioral effects on developing brains.

The World Health Organization's 2019 inclusion of "gaming disorder" in the ICD-11 was cited by researchers and legal advocates as a significant recognition of the clinical reality.

Here is what is happening in courts: class action lawsuits against major video game publishers have been filed in multiple jurisdictions alleging that these addiction-by-design features constitute an unfair or deceptive practice under consumer protection laws. Some cases have cited internal documents suggesting developers had awareness of addiction-risk features.

This area of law is moving quickly. Our team is actively following these developments and consulting with families affected by severe gaming addiction in minors. If your child's life has been severely impacted by compulsive gaming, please reach out to us for an evaluation.

We offer 100% free consultations by calling 855-566-3752 or you can visit us online at https://bit.ly/45Z8Y6a

Note: This is informational only and not a substitute for medical or legal advice.

Can Parents Sue Video Game Companies for Addiction That Harmed Their Child?

"Nothing in this video, or in links provided in the description of this video, constitutes legal advice or the practice of law. Nor does viewing this page form an attorney/client relationship between you and any Lawyer at our law firm. All visitors should consult with a qualified legal professional regarding their individual questions, needs, or issues that may be of concern. We are not responsible for any action taken by a reader based upon any information in this video. All of the content in this video is for general informational and educational purposes only."

07/21/2026

Can Sulfonamide Antibiotics Like Bactrim or Septra Cause Stevens Johnson Syndrome?

https://bit.ly/45Z8Y6a | (855) 566-3752

Can Sulfonamide Antibiotics Like Bactrim or Septra Cause Stevens Johnson Syndrome?

It Was Just an Antibiotic for a UTI. Then Everything Changed. Here Is What Families Need to Know About Sulfa Drugs and SJS

Sulfonamide antibiotics — a class that includes drugs commonly known by trade names like Bactrim and Septra — have been used for decades to treat urinary tract infections, certain respiratory infections, and other bacterial conditions. They are among the most commonly prescribed antibiotic classes in the world. And they are among the most frequently cited drug classes in Stevens Johnson Syndrome case literature.

The association between sulfonamides and serious cutaneous adverse reactions including SJS has been documented in the medical literature for decades. Research has found that patients with HIV infection are at significantly elevated risk for sulfonamide-induced SJS — a finding that has important implications for how these medications should be prescribed and monitored in immunocompromised populations.

According to adverse event data reviewed in peer-reviewed literature, sulfonamide antibiotics appear consistently among the most common triggers of SJS and TEN in case series and pharmacovigilance databases globally. The European Medicines Agency, the FDA, and regulatory agencies in other countries have addressed sulfonamide SJS risk in their prescribing information.

Here is what matters legally: when a physician prescribes a sulfonamide antibiotic, were there risk factors present that should have prompted either a different antibiotic choice or heightened monitoring? Was the patient told what to watch for? Was a developing rash appropriately evaluated and acted upon quickly?

In some SJS cases, the primary legal claim runs against the drug manufacturer for inadequate labeling. In others, the prescribing physician's management of early SJS symptoms is the central issue. In many, both are relevant.

Our team has handled sulfonamide-related SJS cases for decades. If you or a family member developed SJS after taking a sulfa drug, please call us. We will evaluate your case honestly and thoroughly at no cost.

We offer 100% free consultations by calling 855-566-3752 or you can visit us online at https://bit.ly/45Z8Y6a

Note: This is informational only and not a substitute for medical or legal advice.

Can Sulfonamide Antibiotics Like Bactrim or Septra Cause Stevens Johnson Syndrome?

"Nothing in this video, or in links provided in the description of this video, constitutes legal advice or the practice of law. Nor does viewing this page form an attorney/client relationship between you and any Lawyer at our law firm. All visitors should consult with a qualified legal professional regarding their individual questions, needs, or issues that may be of concern. We are not responsible for any action taken by a reader based upon any information in this video. All of the content in this video is for general informational and educational purposes only."

Address

1213 Culbreth Drive
Wilmington, NC
28405

Website

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when Greg Jones Law posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Contact The Practice

Send a message to Greg Jones Law:

Shortcuts

Share

Category