12/18/2017
NASW Joins "Friend of the Court" Briefs in Contraception, Wedding Cake, and Transgender Military Ban Cases
NASW participated in amicus briefs ("friend of the court briefs") filed in recent court cases involving the Affordable Care Act's contraceptive coverage requirement; the validity of Colorado's anti-discrimination statute, which prevents commercial businesses from discriminating on the basis of s*xual orientation, race, religion, and other attributes; and President Trump's transgender military ban that was scheduled to go into effect in March 2018. Friend of the court briefs are accepted by courts as an aid to understanding aspects of issues that may not be fully addressed by the parties to the litigation, or where specialized knowledge may be helpful in reaching a conclusion in high-profile cases.
• Pennsylvania v. Trump
The Trump administration issued two regulations that allow any employer or university to deny employees, students, and their dependents contraceptive coverage if the employer/university has a religious or moral objection to contraception, while leaving women with no alternative for seamless, no-cost coverage of this critical health benefit. NASW, along with several other organizations, participated in an amicus brief in support of Pennsylvania's lawsuit to block the Trump administration rules that broadly exempt employers and universities from complying with the Affordable Care Act's contraceptive coverage requirement. The brief argues that seamless, no-cost contraceptive access is essential to women's health and advancement, and substantial numbers of women in every state are at risk of losing contraceptive coverage given the broad swath of institutions that can now invoke a religious or moral objection. Eight states and several civil rights groups filed suit against these rules in federal court, arguing that the rules violate constitutional and statutory laws prohibiting s*x discrimination, the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment, and the Administrative Procedure Act. The District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania hears Pennsylvania's request for a preliminary injunction today, December 14, 2017.
• Masterpiece Cakeshop, Ltd. v. Colorado Civil Rights Commission
NASW partnered with the American Psychological Association on the amicus brief in Masterpiece Cakeshop, Ltd. v. Colorado Civil Rights Commission. The U.S. Supreme Court case addresses the validity of Colorado's anti-discrimination statute, which prevents commercial businesses from discriminating on the basis of s*xual orientation, race, religion, and other attributes. In this case, the business owner raised First Amendment claims based on speech and religion, arguing that he should not be required to provide a gay couple with a wedding cake. In the amicus brief, NASW supports the need for legal protections from discrimination and provides scientific research to the courts regarding the nature of s*xual orientation, discrimination, and the effects of stigma.
• Doe et al. v. Trump et al.
In August 2017, the plaintiffs, National Center for Le***an Rights (NCLR) and GLBTQ Legal Advocates & Defenders (GLAD), filed a lawsuit in Doe et al. v. Trump et al. on behalf of a number of transgender individuals in federal district court challenging the President's transgender military ban that would remove all transgender service members from the United States military and ban transgender people from entering the armed forces, effective March 2018. On October 4, 2017, NASW, along with several other mental health and medical organizations, participated in an amicus brief in support of a preliminary injunction against the President's transgender military ban. On October 30, 2017, a federal court partially blocked President Trump's ban on transgender people serving in the military, ruling that the ban cannot be enforced while the case is being reviewed in court. The judge favorably cited the amicus brief several times in her opinion.