District Employment Law PLLC

District Employment Law PLLC We exclusively represent employees because we are committed to fighting for your workplace rights. Each client’s objectives are unique.

We exclusively represent employees because we are committed to fighting for your rights in the workplace. We know how hard it is to speak up when your employer violates those rights. And we know that the legal system often stacks the deck against employees. Let us guide you through the process, seek accountability, and fight for the best outcome for you. We take a client-centered, results-driven a

pproach to our cases. We can help identify your goals, establish the best plan of action to achieve those goals, and passionately advocate on your behalf. Our ideal clients are high-performing, well-respected professionals from all industries and walks of life who find themselves in an impossible workplace situation through no fault of their own. We are just as selective in choosing the right clients as you should be in choosing the right employment lawyer.

District Employment Law is proud to sponsor the Vienna Turkey Trot 10k, 5k and Fun Run on Sunday, November 24, 2024! All...
11/22/2024

District Employment Law is proud to sponsor the Vienna Turkey Trot 10k, 5k and Fun Run on Sunday, November 24, 2024! All proceeds benefit the James Madison High School Band and the Vienna Volunteer Fire Department. We look forward to seeing you at the Finish Line Festival!

The EEO process for federal employees includes many deadlines and hurdles that are designed to trip you up.Follow this t...
10/23/2024

The EEO process for federal employees includes many deadlines and hurdles that are designed to trip you up.

Follow this two-part guide to navigate that process, including the informal and formal EEO complaints, alternative dispute resolution, and the EEO investigation.

This article will walk you through the EEO process, answer FAQs, and offer guidance on how to navigate the roadblocks that federal agencies create for EEO complainants.

Lawdragon has again named all three of District Employment Law's partners, Peter Whelan, Kristen Sinisi, and Devin Wrigl...
08/15/2024

Lawdragon has again named all three of District Employment Law's partners, Peter Whelan, Kristen Sinisi, and Devin Wrigley, in its list of the 500 Leading Civil Rights & Plaintiff Employment Lawyers.

As Lawdragon explains, "We all want a fair chance. These are the lawyers who’ve made that their lives’ work. So many rights we now take for granted – for minorities, women, the disabled and others – came about because of a plaintiff lawyer who decided to stand up."

Check out the full 2024 list here: https://www.lawdragon.com/guides/2024-07-26-the-2024-lawdragon-500-leading-civil-rights-plaintiff-employment-lawyers

📣Employees: Employers don’t offer severance out of the goodness of their hearts, but to entice you to sign a severance a...
07/02/2024

📣Employees: Employers don’t offer severance out of the goodness of their hearts, but to entice you to sign a severance agreement. Such agreements require you to give up important legal rights.

Severance agreements are drafted by companies' lawyers and heavily favor employers. To protect your rights, you should consult an employment lawyer before you sign a severance agreement.

To learn more about severance agreements and common pitfalls to avoid, check out our blog post!

What you should know before you sign a severance agreement: how to evaluate whether the agreement is fair, negotiate a better severance, and avoid common mistakes.

04/23/2024

❗ Workers--big news from the FTC! 👇

Today, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) voted 3-2 to issue its Final Rule to prohibit employers from entering into and enforcing most noncompete clauses against workers. A link to the Final Rule is in the comments.

The FTC issued the Final Rule under Section 5 of the FTC Act, which prohibits ‘‘unfair methods of competition,” and under Section 6(g) of the Act, which authorizes the FTC to prevent the use of unfair methods of competition in commerce.

Non-compete clauses have come under increased scrutiny because they chill employee speech, reduce competition in the marketplace, decrease employee mobility, suppress wages, and inhibit new business formation and innovation.

Here are a few of the key takeaways:

✔ The Final Rule will prohibit employers from entering into NEW non-competes with ALL workers.
✔ The Rule broadly defines "workers" to include individuals who are paid or unpaid, and the definition encompasses employees, independent contractors, externs, interns, volunteers, apprentices, sole proprietors who provides services to a person, and individuals who work for a franchisee or franchisor.
✔ The Final Rule will prohibit employers from enforcing or attempting to enforce EXISTING non-competes against workers, except that employers may enforce EXISTING non-competes against senior executives. The FTC found that senior executives, unlike other workers, are more likely to negotiate, and be compensated for, their non-competes.
✔ With respect to workers other than senior executives, employers must rescind, and notify workers that they will not enforce, non-competes after the effective date of the Final Rule.

Yesterday, the U.S. Supreme Court issued a landmark ruling in Murray v. UBS Securities, LLC, where it held that a SOX-re...
02/09/2024

Yesterday, the U.S. Supreme Court issued a landmark ruling in Murray v. UBS Securities, LLC, where it held that a SOX-retaliation plaintiff need not prove an employer's "retaliatory intent." District Employment Law Partner Kristen Sinisi spoke to Law 360 about the potential impact of this ruling on cases brought under other federal anti-discrimination statutes, such as Title VII.

As Kristen explained, SOX's burden-shifting framework (established under AIR21) and Title VII's burden-shifting framework (established under McDonnell Douglas) both enable plaintiffs to prove retaliation by indirect evidence and "get[ ] at the facts surrounding an employer's intent."

Thus, under the Murray ruling, "attempts by employers to import a 'retaliatory intent' requirement to the McDonnell Douglas framework should similarly be rejected, because, as the court noted, such a requirement [would] 'ignore the statute's mandatory burden-shifting framework.'"

Read more here: https://www.law360.com/employment-authority/articles/1795956 #

The U.S. Supreme Court held Thursday that whistleblowers don't need to show that employers displayed retaliatory intent to have a viable case under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, a ruling experts say could help workers pursuing retaliation claims under discrimination laws like Title VII keep their claims i...

Do you need a reasonable accommodation at work and have questions about how to request one? In this blog post, Kristen S...
01/11/2024

Do you need a reasonable accommodation at work and have questions about how to request one? In this blog post, Kristen Sinisi offers practical tips on how to request a workplace accommodation and navigate the interactive process.

Qualified individuals with a disability are entitled to a reasonable accommodation in the workplace. Find out how to request one.

Please join District Employment Law PLLC Attorney Kristen Sinisi on December 7, 2023, for a webinar on how to avoid and ...
11/21/2023

Please join District Employment Law PLLC Attorney Kristen Sinisi on December 7, 2023, for a webinar on how to avoid and resolve trade secret claims against employees.

This panel will explore best practices for managing trade secret litigation, how to avoid common pitfalls, and how employees can use confidential company information to support their legal claims against employers within the bounds of the law.

This free webinar is presented by the Metropolitan Washington Employment Lawyers Association's Bench Bar Committee and co-sponsored by the Federal Bar Association - Maryland Chapter.

District Employment Law is pleased to announce that Partner Peter Whelan has been selected for The Best Lawyers® in Amer...
08/17/2023

District Employment Law is pleased to announce that Partner Peter Whelan has been selected for The Best Lawyers® in America list for 2024 based on his exceptional representation of individuals in employment matters.

We are proud to have Pete on our team!

Peter M. Whelan is a Employment Law - Individuals attorney in Washington, DC. Read Peter M. Whelan's profile to learn more about them and discover their...

Did you know that employees working in D.C. can take protected leave to attend school-sponsored events for their kids?Le...
08/09/2023

Did you know that employees working in D.C. can take protected leave to attend school-sponsored events for their kids?

Learn about protected leave for new mothers and working parents under D.C. and federal law in our blog post:

Both District of Columbia and federal law provide protected leave for new mothers, working parents, and employees with other family responsibilities.

Employees should never have to silently endure sexual harassment, but we know it takes immense courage to report that ha...
07/21/2023

Employees should never have to silently endure sexual harassment, but we know it takes immense courage to report that harassment. This blog post outlines strategies to use both before reporting and while actually reporting your harasser:

Reporting sexual harassment in the workplace is a life-and career-altering decision. Protect yourself from retaliation before reporting by following these steps.

Address

1101 Connecticut Avenue NW, Suite 450
Washington D.C., DC
20036

Opening Hours

Monday 9am - 6pm
Tuesday 9am - 6pm
Wednesday 9am - 6pm
Thursday 9am - 6pm
Friday 9am - 6pm

Telephone

+12028106150

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when District Employment Law PLLC posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Contact The Practice

Send a message to District Employment Law PLLC:

Featured

Share