The Law Office of William B. Parkhurst, PC

The Law Office of William B. Parkhurst, PC Contact information, map and directions, contact form, opening hours, services, ratings, photos, videos and announcements from The Law Office of William B. Parkhurst, PC, Lawyer & Law Firm, 397 Little Neck Road , Bldg. 3300 S. , Ste. 206, Virginia Beach, VA.

Established in Virginia Beach, our firm delivers rigorous legal representation across multiple practice areas including Family Law, Criminal Defense, and Civil Litigation.

New opinion digest from Virginia Lawyers Weekly:  Where two defendants challenged their convictions related to a spree o...
08/24/2026

New opinion digest from Virginia Lawyers Weekly: Where two defendants challenged their convictions related to a spree of armed robberies, but the evidence establishing one defendant’s guilt was “crushing” and a “mountain of evidence” established the other defendant’s guilt, their convictions were affirmed.

Where two defendants challenged their convictions related to a spree of armed robberies, but the evidence establishing one defendant’s guilt was “crushing” and a “mountain of evidence” established the other defendant’s guilt, their convictions were affirmed.

New opinion digest from Virginia Lawyers Weekly:  Where the defendant argued that the Second Amendment renders 18 U.S.C....
08/17/2026

New opinion digest from Virginia Lawyers Weekly: Where the defendant argued that the Second Amendment renders 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(4), which imposes a lifetime ban on those who have been involuntarily committed to a mental institution from purchasing or possessing a firearm, facially unconstitutional, this challenge failed.

Where the defendant argued that the Second Amendment renders 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(4), which imposes a lifetime ban on those who have been involuntarily committed to a mental institution from purchasing or possessing a firearm, facially unconstitutional, this challenge failed.

New opinion digest from Virginia Lawyers Weekly:  Where the district court did not err when it instructed the jury on th...
08/10/2026

New opinion digest from Virginia Lawyers Weekly: Where the district court did not err when it instructed the jury on the relevant elements of S*x Offender Registration and Notification Act, the defendant’s conviction was affirmed.

Where the district court did not err when it instructed the jury on the relevant elements of S*x Offender Registration and Notification Act, the defendant’s conviction was affirmed.

08/03/2026

New opinion digest from Virginia Lawyers Weekly: Where the defendant argued that the district court did not adequately explain why it denied his motion for compassionate release, but the record showed otherwise, the district court’s order was affirmed.

Where the defendant argued that the district court did not adequately explain why it denied his motion for compassionate release, but the record showed otherwise, the district court’s order was affirmed.

New opinion digest from Virginia Lawyers Weekly:  Where the plaintiff argued a law enforcement officer searched his Face...
07/27/2026

New opinion digest from Virginia Lawyers Weekly: Where the plaintiff argued a law enforcement officer searched his Facebook and Gmail accounts in retaliation for his community advocacy, but he failed to plead facts making it plausible the officer did not have probable cause to search the accounts, the suit was dismissed.

Where the plaintiff argued a law enforcement officer searched his Facebook and Gmail accounts in retaliation for his community advocacy, but he failed to plead facts making it plausible the officer did not have probable cause to search the accounts, the suit was dismissed.

New opinion digest from Virginia Lawyers Weekly:  Where the record supported a man’s convictions for abduction, abductio...
07/20/2026

New opinion digest from Virginia Lawyers Weekly: Where the record supported a man’s convictions for abduction, abduction with intent to defile and possession of child po*******hy, they were affirmed.

Where the record supported a man’s convictions for abduction, abduction with intent to defile and possession of child po*******hy, they were affirmed.

New opinion digest from Virginia Lawyers Weekly:  Where the circuit court rules on a defendant’s timely motion for a sen...
07/13/2026

New opinion digest from Virginia Lawyers Weekly: Where the circuit court rules on a defendant’s timely motion for a sentence modification under Code § 19.2-303, but, by the time this court rules on the appeal, more than 60 days have passed since the defendant’s transfer to the Department of Corrections, the appeal is moot.

Where the circuit court rules on a defendant’s timely motion for a sentence modification under Code § 19.2-303, but, by the time this court rules on the appeal, more than 60 days have passed since the defendant’s transfer to the Department of Corrections, the appeal is moot.

New opinion digest from Virginia Lawyers Weekly:  Where a firearm was located within arm’s reach of the defendant when h...
07/06/2026

New opinion digest from Virginia Lawyers Weekly: Where a firearm was located within arm’s reach of the defendant when he was sitting in the driver’s seat, and he was the driver and purported owner of the vehicle, there was sufficient evidence to support the conviction for possessing a firearm as a convicted felon.

Where a firearm was located within arm’s reach of the defendant when he was sitting in the driver’s seat, and he was the driver and purported owner of the vehicle, there was sufficient evidence to support the conviction for possessing a firearm as a convicted felon.

New opinion digest from Virginia Lawyers Weekly:  Where a man charged with violating 18 U.S.C. § 922(n) argued the statu...
06/29/2026

New opinion digest from Virginia Lawyers Weekly: Where a man charged with violating 18 U.S.C. § 922(n) argued the statute violated the Second Amendment, this challenge failed. The statute is consistent with three different founding-era regulatory traditions: (1) restrictions on the interstate transportation of fi****ms and munitions; (2) disarming persons under felony indictment and (3) b...

Where a man charged with violating 18 U.S.C. § 922(n) argued the statute violated the Second Amendment, this challenge failed. The statute is consistent with three different founding-era regulatory traditions: (1) restrictions on the interstate transportation of fi****ms and munitions; (2) disarmin...

New opinion digest from Virginia Lawyers Weekly:  Where the Board of Immigration Appeals made a conclusory judgment that...
06/22/2026

New opinion digest from Virginia Lawyers Weekly: Where the Board of Immigration Appeals made a conclusory judgment that the petitioner’s particular social group was “circular per se,” without conducting a fact-based, case-specific inquiry, it erred.

Where the Board of Immigration Appeals made a conclusory judgment that the petitioner’s particular social group was “circular per se,” without conducting a fact-based, case-specific inquiry, it erred.

Address

397 Little Neck Road , Bldg. 3300 S. , Ste. 206
Virginia Beach, VA
23452

Opening Hours

Monday 8am - 5:30pm
Tuesday 8am - 5:30pm
Wednesday 8am - 5:30pm
Thursday 8am - 5:30pm
Friday 8:30am - 1pm

Telephone

+17574569070

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when The Law Office of William B. Parkhurst, PC posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Contact The Practice

Send a message to The Law Office of William B. Parkhurst, PC:

Shortcuts

Share