12/06/2017
Blomstrom v. Tripp, 402 P.3d 831 (2017) is a must read opinion for DUI Attorneys in Washington State. The Washington Supreme Court recently struck down pre-trial urinalysis as a condition of release for defendants charged with DUI. In short, pre-trial urinalysis is an invasion of privacy under Article 1, Section 7 of the Washington State Constitution. Unfortunately, the opinion only addressed pre-trial urinalysis. The courts still have discretion to impose other conditions of pre-trial release including but not limited to a transdermal monitor known as a SCRAM device which can cost hundreds of dollars per month to wear. Certainly, more expensive than random urinalysis. That said, I think there is argument that a transdermal monitor is analogous to the invasiveness of urinalysis but I guess that is a legal fight for another day.
The case involves three people arrested in 2015 in Spokane County who were ordered to participate in random urinalysis testing as a condition of pretrial release.