04/05/2023
In routine Purchase and Sale Agreements for residential real estate, it is common to see a mortgage contingency date and a closing date. Missing from the standard contracts in use by Connecticut realtors in Hartford and Litchfield Counties is verbage about the importance of closing on time. Sometimes buyers will have made big plans to have movers showing up at the house or buyers have to vacate an apartment and they expect the new house to be ready to close on the contract closing date. As those of us who regularly handle mortgage financed closings know, a lender or a seller may want some sort of delay in the process. Connecticut case law holds that a contract which does not specify "time is of the essence" will allow the seller or the buyer or the lender some wiggle room on the closing date. Unfortunately, for a buyer who has to be out of his or her apartment or has the moving van guys showing up - a last minute hold on the closing date can spell disaster. The same could be said for a seller who needs the buyer's funds in order to enable the seller to purchase another house which the seller has under contract. I understand that many realtors hesitate to insert "time is of the essence" clauses in contracts, as that clause can be a double-edged sword. The only solution to these dilemmas is good planning. Both the realtors and the attorneys need to talk to their clients as early as possible in the contracting process to make sure that the buyer or the seller will not have any undue timing issues. If there is going to be a need for a "hard closing date" then it should be addressed in the original contract rather than causing issues later on in the process. Even if you don't specify "time is of the essence" it would be good practice to express something in the contract which reflects the buyer's or the seller's sense of urgency and provides some recourse in the event that one party cannot perform by the specified date. A stitch in time saves nine.