05/27/2026
99% of people believe something about car accidents that's completely wrong
"The other driver got a ticket, so obviously they were at fault."
I hear this every week. And every week, I deliver bad news:
Traffic tickets can't prove fault in personal injury cases. Even if the driver was found guilty.
In Washington state, evidence of traffic infractions isn't admissible in civil court.
"You mean the officer issued a failure-to-yield ticket, the driver was found guilty, and I can't use that in my lawsuit?"
Correct.
Traffic court asks: "Did you violate this traffic rule?"
Civil court asks: "Were you negligent and did your negligence cause injuries?"
Different questions. Different evidence standards.
A driver can get a ticket but not be at fault for your injuries. Or avoid a ticket but still be 100% liable.
I've had rear-end cases where the other driver was speeding but got no ticket. Does that mean they weren't at fault? Obviously not.
I've also had cases where the other driver got a ticket and was found guilty. When we sued, their insurance denied liability and we had to prove fault using witnesses and physical evidence.
We couldn't mention the ticket.
Just because the other driver didn't get a ticket doesn't mean they weren't at fault. Officers make quick decisions without witnessing what happened.
But in civil court, we investigate. We interview witnesses, examine vehicles, and determine what really happened.
Your case will be won on facts, not citations.
Don't let insurance companies dismiss your case because their driver didn't get a ticket. And don't assume you have a slam-dunk because they did.
The truth matters more than the ticket.
DM us if you have questions about your case