02/02/2022
Restructuring Public Defense After Padilla: Stanford Law Review [Aka how to do crim/imm right!?]
https://review.law.stanford.edu/wp-content/uploads/sites/3/2022/01/Eagly-et-al.-74-Stan.-L.-Rev.-1.pdf
In the 2010 landmark decision Padilla v. Kentucky, the Supreme Court held that the Sixth Amendment right to counsel demands that criminal defense attorneys inform their clients of adverse immigration consequences that may flow from a guilty plea. Although over a decade has passed since Padilla, astonishingly little is known about how
public defense systems have incorporated this watershed decision on the ground. This
Article presents the first empirical study of representation by public defenders in the postPadilla era.