08/27/2026
The jury isn’t deciding whether Lindsay Clancy killed her children.
That fact isn’t being disputed.
The real legal question at the center of the Lindsay Clancy trial is much more complicated: Was she suffering from a severe mental disease or defect that deprived her of the ability to understand that her conduct was wrong; or to conform her conduct to the law?
Founding partner and former Bexar County District Attorney Nico LaHood and criminal defense trial lawyer Patrick Ballantyne break down what the insanity defense actually requires and the question this Massachusetts jury will ultimately have to answer.
Mental illness alone does not automatically establish a legal insanity defense.
That distinction may determine the outcome of this case.
What do you think: Has the defense presented enough evidence to establish that Lindsay Clancy was not criminally responsible for her actions?
Didn’t catch our live? Message us for the link if you missed it.
LaHood Norton Goss Law Group
210-797-7700
TrialLawyer LegalAnalysis CourtroomAnalysis