06/28/2024
I can't believe I HAVE to keep clarifying this for everyone out there doing sub2/wrap but someone is teaching this incorrectly and y'all are RUNNING with it....
A Subject To is when you take the property subject to the existing financing. You CAN have a Note/Deed of Trust to Secure Performance or Assumption - these docs do NOT make it a wraparound.
A Wraparound is where the Seller finances a portion of the sales price equal to or more than the first lien existing note(or all current notes). It is considered a mirror wrap when the terms are the exact same as the first lien. It is still a wrap if it's a mirror wrap - a mirror wrap is not a subject to. The buyer is not paying the first line note in a wrap, they are paying the note that has been financed to them by the seller - whether it's a mirror wrap or regular wrap.
If you're doing these deals you have to understand these differences in terminology. I just had a TC (yes...a TC) tell me that they wanted both a note/mortage/deed of trust from the buyer to seller (for what? idk because there was no seller financing addendum or anything being financed by the seller) and A Note and Deed of Trust to Secure Performance on a Sub2, and then simultaneously said that the transaction is a wrap (which was news to me because again, there is no seller finance terms, etc. and they've provided only sub2 docs this entire time). 🤦🏻♀️
Moral of the story is that this happens a lot -- and mostly from TCs who don't know their terminology, but also from investors who put these terms in contracts but intend something else.
Please learn the differences and nuances in these transactions and what they are and imply if you're going to be handling these deals.