Law Offices of Thomas C. Bixby, LLC

Law Offices of Thomas C. Bixby, LLC Educating the Public with legal news of personal injury cases

12/05/2025

Zarin's Jury Verdict Review and Analysis - Your authoritative resource for civil jury verdicts since 1980

National Edition
Selected cases taken from April 2025
Critical verdict outcomes and analysis written for attorneys, by attorneys

$78,000,000 VERDICT
Product Liability
Product Liability – Defective Design – Fatal fair ride ending in death of one person and catastrophic injuries for three others – 60-foot-high swing detached while in operation, throwing and killing 19-year-old from blunt force trauma after being thrown and striking tractor-trailer’s fifth wheel

The plaintiffs were out for a day at the state fair when this catastrophic accident occurred. A 60-foot-high swing ride detached causing death and serious injuries. The 18-year-old plaintiff suffered blunt force trauma and death after being thrown 60 feet and striking a tractor-trailer’s fifth wheel plate. The 19-year-old plaintiff suffered head trauma, broken bones, 12 surgeries and multiple fractures. The 36-year-old plaintiff suffered a skull fracture, traumatic brain injury and multiple fractures. The 30-year-old plaintiff suffered multiple fractures and a pneumothorax, and underwent 8 surgeries ...

Send a message to learn more

03/15/2024

Lawyers in Musk compensation case request approximately 29 million Tesla shares – valued at over $5 billion – to cover legal fees.
MARCH 9, 20241 COMMENT
This post is an exercise in procrastination.

Do I want to blog about contingent fees on a Saturday morning?

No, I don’t. I’d rather go for a run.

Indeed, a few minutes ago, I set out to do just that: run. However, 0.08 miles into the effort, I stopped and walked home. I gave up because of the wind. It’s currently blowing 18 MPH and, of all the weather conditions, “very windy” is one of my least favorites in which to run.

But if I don’t run today, there’s no way I can skip tomorrow’s run. And, unfortunately, tomorrow looks windier than today, along with a side of “cold rain,” a combination that ranks even lower on my list than “very windy.” So, here I sit, trying to convince myself that posting a blog will somehow get me in the mood to run in today’s wind instead of tomorrow’s wind, cold, and rain.

Earlier this week I came across a Reuters article headlined “Could the $6 billion legal fee in the Musk’s Tesla case be reasonable?” After reading it, additional searching of the interwebs led me to these headlines from, respectively, Fortune and the ABA Journal:

Elon Musk’s $56 billion pay pact was killed by lawyers who are now seeking 29 million Tesla shares to cover legal fees
Lawyers seek over $288K per hour in attorney’s fee, payable in Tesla stock, for suit toppling Elon Musk’s compensation
I understand that numbers like “$6 billion” and “29 million Tesla shares” and “$288K per hour” are likely to cause an initial reaction of “that’s outrageous! you’ve to got to be _ #$%&*_ kidding me!!!”

If that was your reaction, trust me, I get it. But humor me. Check out the brief that was filed in support of the fee application. I don’t know if it’ll change your mind, but I bet it’ll at least make you think twice about your gut reaction.[1]

Notably, early on, the lawyers expressly acknowledge “that the requested fee is unprecedented in terms of absolute size.” They go on to argue that is

“because our law rewards counsel’s efforts undertaken on a fully contingent basis that, through full adjudication, produce enormous benefits to the company and subject the lawyers to significant risk. And here, the size of the requested award is great because the value of the benefit to Tesla that Plaintiff’s Counsel achieved was massive.”
Again, humor me. Read the brief. I can’t wait to read the reply. I assume I will find it equally fascinating.

Anyhow, I doubt many Vermont lawyers will ever find themselves asking a court to approve a fee valued at nearly $6 billion. However, many of you likely enter into contingent fee arrangements. If you do, check out Back to Basics: Contingent Fees and Contingent Fee: $18,500 per hour? Each includes a refresher on contingent fees.[2]

As always, let’s be careful out there.[3]

12/12/2023

MA Jury Hands Down $20M+ To***co Trial Verdict Against RJR
Posted by Arlin Crisco on Dec 7, 2023 1:26:55 PM

Woburn, MA— Jurors last week issued a $20.7 million verdict against R.J. Reynolds for the mouth cancer a Massachusetts man developed after decades of smoking. Reppucci v. R.J. Reynolds, et al., 2081CV02095.

The Middlesex County, Massachusetts Superior Court jury handed down the award after finding ci******es made by R.J. Reynolds and its current subsidiary, Santa Fe Natural To***co Co., were defectively designed and caused Joseph Reppucci’s 2018 oropharyngeal cancer.

The verdict also found Reynolds liable on negligent marketing, misrepresentation, and conspiracy claims. Jurors cleared defendant DeMoulas Supermarkets, which sold ci******es to Reppucci.

Reppucci, 70, smoked Reynolds’ "Winston" and "Winston Light" brands for years before switching to Santa Fe Natural To***co’s "Natural American Spirit" varieties in the 1990s. He claims a 2018 bout of oropharyngeal cancer (following a 2002 bout with the disease) was caused by Reynolds’ false marketing and by dangerous ci******es designed to be addictive.

CVN Holiday Special - 50 Percent off - Use Code HAPPYHOLIDAYS

Last week’s award includes $14.4 million for Reppucci’s pain and suffering and $5.7 million to his wife, along with more than $685,000 for his medical expenses.

The trial focused in large part on what drove Reppucci to smoke through much of his life. Reynolds contends ci******es are inherently dangerous and Reppucci continued to smoke for years, despite knowing the risks involved.

During closings, Jones Day’s John Walker, representing Reynolds, reviewed evidence he said showed ci******es, by their very nature, were dangerous and that proposed alternative designs were not viable or would fundamentally change the product so that it was no longer considered a cigarette.

Walker also walked jurors through a timeline of Reppucci’s smoking history, noting he was warned against ci******es by sources ranging from doctors to messages on the cigarette packs themselves. However, Walker said Reppucci’s attempts to stop smoking in time to avoid his mouth cancer were inconsistent.

“The reality is that Mr. Reppucci could have done more to stop smoking and to avoid his 2018 cancer,” Walker said.

But Reppucci’s attorney, Dolan Dobrinsky Rosenblum Bluestein’s Randy Rosenblum, countered with evidence he said showed that Reynolds engineered its ci******es to be as addictive as possible, then worked for decades as part of a broader to***co industry conspiracy to conceal the dangers of smoking.

Rosenblum argued that evidence showed Reynolds’ actions led Reppucci to become so hooked to the ni****ne in ci******es that he failed in multiple quit attempts across decades, and despite the aid of smoking cessation drugs. Rosenblum added that alternative cigarette designs, such as those with ni****ne levels unlikely to addict smokers, could have led to a different result for Reppucci.

“If Mr. Reppucci had used these alternative designs, he would have avoided more likely than not… his oropharyngeal cancer,” Rosenblum said.

Email Arlin Crisco at [email protected].

07/25/2023

Mass. Supreme Court to plaintiff lawyers: Death doesn't bring new life for lawsuits
STATE SUPREME COURT

ORGANIZATIONS IN THIS STORY

MASSACHUSETTS SUPREME COURT
By John O'Brien
Jul 19, 2023
BOSTON (Legal Newsline) - A person's death after a long illness does not create a new chance for their estate to file a lawsuit, the Massachusetts Supreme Court has ruled in a pair of closely watched cases.

Rejecting arguments from plaintiffs attorneys, the court held July 6 that smokers who had missed the statute of limitations to sue the to***co industry over their injuries while alive can't have their estates sue after they died.

Plaintiffs lawyers argued wrongful death claims are given a three-year window to be filed after a person's death. But the court noted a difference in the case of the smokers, essentially ruling their deaths didn't trigger a brand-new three-year period to file suit.

"In these case, because the decedents had no right to bring a cause of action for the injuries that caused their deaths at the time that they died as a result of the running of the statute of limitations on the decedents' underlying tort and breach of warranty claims, the plaintiffs, as personal representatives of the decedents' estates, had no right to bring wrongful death actions based on those injuries," the ruling says.

One lawsuit, brought on behalf of Ralph Fabiano, targeted Philip Morris. Fabiano started smoking at 15 years old and in 2004 was diagnosed with emphysema, from which he died in 2014.

John Fuller was a Camel smoker for more than 40 years, having started at 17 years old. Doctors diagnosed him with lung cancer in 2012, and he died four years later. The ensuing lawsuit blamed R.J. Reynolds.

Though subsequent lawsuits were filed within the three-year window for wrongful death claims, the court found since the estates represented the dead men who had not filed suit after discovering their illnesses, they had no right to sue after their deaths from those illnesses.

The Massachusetts Defense Lawyers Association and the Product Liability Advisory Council submitted amicus briefs in favor of the defendants, while the Massachusetts Academy of Trial Attorneys supported the plaintiffs' arguments.

05/01/2023

$20 Million Awarded to Amputee in Massachusetts Medical Malpractice Case
Former Massachusetts construction worker, Steven Luppold, was awarded $20 million after undergoing an amputation due to a misdiagnosed blood clot.

Kandace Watkins, J.D.
Written by Kandace Watkins, J.D.
on April 26, 2023

linkedin
facebook
twitter
icon
MEDICAL RECORD REVIEW
Consult your on-call team of physicians

Our team of 60+ doctors can review medical records, screen cases for merit, and help you develop winning trial strategies

Start a Medical Record Review
Start a Medical Record Review
$20 Million Awarded to Amputee in Massachusetts Medical Malpractice Case
A Middlesex County Superior Court jury returned a verdict for the highest medical malpractice award of the year. Former Massachusetts construction worker, Steven Luppold, was awarded $20 million after undergoing an amputation due to a misdiagnosed blood clot.

The Background
Mr. Luppold, 35, of Lowell, MA presented at the Lowell General Hospital Emergency Department on March 7, 2015, complaining of back pain radiating down to his left leg. While Mr. Luppold had a documented history of sciatica, which is back pain that radiates down the leg, he was concerned because of the discomfort he was experiencing in his left foot.

Mr. Luppold underwent a physical examination at the emergency department. The examination revealed that his left foot was cool and purple. Based upon this examination, Dr. Charles Loucraft diagnosed Mr. Luppold with worsening sciatica and sent him home without further treatment or examination.

On March 13, 2015, Mr. Luppold returned to the emergency department complaining of pain in his left ankle that rose to the level of 10 on a scale of 1-10. The nurse that examined Mr. Luppold concluded that his complaints were associated with his sciatica.

On March 17, 2015, after experiencing ongoing pain, Mr. Luppold contacted his primary care physician and presented at Lahey Hospital & Medical Center. Mr. Luppold underwent an ultrasound, which revealed left leg deep vein thrombosis and arterial thrombosis. Based on this diagnosis, Mr. Luppold was summarily transported to the emergency department. At the emergency department, a vascular surgeon ordered a CT scan that showed that the tissue in his left leg was dying.

On March 18, 2015, Mr. Luppold’s doctors concluded that they had to amputate his leg above the knee.

The Allegations
Mr. Luppold, represented by Robert Higgins, filed a lawsuit against Lowell General Hospital emergency department staff and medical staff for Merrimack Valley Emergency Associates. James Bello represented the Merrimack Valley Emergency Associates medical staff and Peter Kelley represented the Lowell General Hospital emergency department staff.

The suit alleged Mr. Luppold’s left leg was amputated after being twice misdiagnosed with sciatica. According to Mr. Luppold’s attorney, his leg could have been saved if the staff ordered an ultrasound during his first emergency department visit.

The Verdict
The trial was held in Middlesex Superior Court. After two days of deliberation, the jury returned a verdict of $20 million in favor of Mr. Luppold. The verdict consisted of $10 million for pain and suffering and another $10 million to compensate for the lifetime loss of a leg.

The verdict, the state’s largest medical malpractice award of the year according to data compiled by Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly, surpassed Mr. Luppold’s request of $16 million. In egregious medical malpractice cases resulting in loss of limb, paralysis, terminal illness, or sterility, jurors are especially sympathetic to plaintiffs. As such, plaintiffs’ attorneys have the ability to demand high awards, particularly in jurisdictions without caps on damages.

03/16/2023

Anesthesiologist Awarded $4.23 Million After Slipping on Water Near Scrub Station in Hospital
In this negligence and premises liability case, the plaintiff sued the defendant for back, head, and neck injuries suffered when he slipped and fell after exiting a surgery room. The jury awarded the doctor $4.23 million for economic losses, medical costs, and pain and suffering.

Carolyn Casey, J.D.
Written by Carolyn Casey, J.D.
— Updated on March 15, 2023

linkedin
facebook
twitter
icon
EXPERT SEARCH
Retain world-class experts

Connect with industry-leading professionals whose credentials meet all your case requirements

Request an expert
Request an expert
Anesthesiologist Awarded $4.23 Million After Slipping on Water Near Scrub Station in Hospital
Case Overview
Case Name: Tareq Khan, M.D. v. CHI St. Luke’s Health Baylor College of Medicine Medical Center f/k/a St. Luke’s Episcopal Hospital

Case Types:

Premises Liability – Dangerous Condition; Negligent Repair and/or Maintenance
Medical Malpractice
Slip and Fall
Injury:

Back – bulging disc, lumbar; herniated disc, lumbar
Concussion
Neck – sprain, cervical; strain, cervical; herniated disc, lumbar
Brain – brain damage; traumatic brain injury
Other – chiropractic; unconsciousness; physical therapy; epidural injections; aggravation of pre-existing condition
Surgeries/Treatment – laminectomy, lumbar
Mental/Psychological – cognition, impairment; memory, impairment; post-concussion syndrome
Plaintiff Attorneys:

John Neese; Meade & Neese LLP
Andrew Meade; Meade & Neese LLP
Defense Attorneys:

Frank N. Luccia; Luccia & Evans
Kathleen E. Evans; Luccia & Evans
Case Outcome: Verdict – Plaintiff

Award Amount: $4,235,693

What Happened?
A wet hospital hallway was the culprit in this case. An anesthesiologist, Dr. Tareq Khan, had already entered the operating room at CHI St. Luke’s Health Baylor College of Medicine Medical Center on January 14, 2014, when the surgeon and surgeon’s assistant arrived for the procedure. Before entering the surgery room, the surgeon and assistant had scrubbed down for the surgery at a hallway scrub station. As they walked to the operating room after washing, soapy liquid dripped from their arms and hands, forming a puddle on the floor.

When Dr. Khan later left the surgery, he slipped on the puddle and fell, hitting his head and falling unconscious. Someone found him knocked out on the floor and took him to the hospital’s emergency room. Emergency room personnel treated Tareq and released him.

Following the slip and fall, Khan received ongoing medical treatment for his injuries through November 2017. He did physical therapy, received chiropractic care, and had epidural steroid injections during his recovery.

Lumbar Disk Surgeries
An MRI showed Tareq had multiple disk bulges and herniations. Dr. Kahn said he had pre-existing degenerative disk disease in his neck and back before the fall at the hospital. However, he did not have symptoms and did not get medical treatment for it.

A herniated disk happens when the jelly-like center of a disk (nucleus) pushes through a tear in its encasement. When the rogue herniated disk compresses a nerve, it can cause pain, weakness, tingling, or numbness in a person’s leg or arm. The leaking jelly-like substance can also inflame and irritate the nerve, leading to more pain. Some people with herniated disks don’t experience symptoms. Disk damage or degeneration can also result in the nucleus pushing out against the disk wall but not breaking through. This is called a bulging disk.

Tareq’s lumbar condition required him to undergo a lumbar laminectomy at one level in November 2017. Doctors perform laminectomies to create space in the spinal canal to relieve spinal cord or nerve pressure. Surgeons remove bone spurs and tissue in the procedure and usually remove small bits of the vertebrae. A year later Kahn had a second lumbar laminectomy at another level.

After the incident, Dr. Kahn said could no longer perform the work of an anesthesiologist.

The Lawsuit’s Allegations and Testimony
Dr. Khan brought a lawsuit against the hospital for negligence that caused injuries to his back, neck, and head. In the action, he brought claims under both the liability statute and premises liability law.

The Wet Floor Hazard
Khan attacked the hospital for a lack of written policies and procedures for the hazardous situation of the dripping on the floor that occurred after doctors and staff scrubbed down in the hallway station. The hospital did not dispute that hazard cleanup was its responsibility. It did, however, state that the hospital orally instructs employees that they are all responsible for cleaning up any hazards. Kahn’s counsel countered with the point that making something everyone’s responsibility means that no one shoulders the responsibility.

Tareq Khan’s counsel maintained that in general and on the day of the incident this hospital was grossly understaffed. Additionally, the plaintiff said the hospital didn’t even know which employees were on duty on the day Dr. Kahn fell. Alternatively, Kahn’s lawyers suggested that if the hospital could identify the staff onsite that day, then they failed to produce the names of those employees in discovery.

The defense flatly denied the assertion that it was understaffed. The hospital also stated that it did not have documentation of staffing that day because the incident happened before it changed computer systems.

Battle of the Experts
Khan asserted that he suffered a concussion, traumatic brain injury, and numerous lumbar disk bulges and herniations from the accident. He also said the fall resulted in cervical sprains and strains, and he maintained that the incident aggravated his pre-existing condition.

Tareq contended that he suffered debilitating headaches, dizziness, memory problems, and cognitive deficiency from his head injuries. Known as post-concussion syndrome, these symptoms can persist for weeks to months. Kahn said that they prevented him from working as an anesthesiologist. Tareq said that after his injuries he can no longer enjoy his usual outdoor activities like hiking.

In contrast to Dr. Kahn’s claims, a defense neurosurgeon medical expert opined that Tareq’s back problems were entirely due to his pre-existing conditions and degenerative in nature. Even if the incident had never happened, this expert stated, Kahn would have eventually needed lumbar laminectomies. The defense also maintained that there was no objective evidence of post-concussion syndrome. Khan’s doctors, the hospital said, used a diagnostic test that was not appropriate for Dr. Khan’s age.

At Khan’s counsel’s request, the jury charge included the “eggshell plaintiff” instruction. This jury instruction protects a plaintiff whose pre-existing condition renders them more susceptible to injury. Here, Khan’s lawyers aimed to persuade the jury that the hospital is liable for aggravating Tareq’s pre-existing back condition and that his prior condition must be accounted for in the damages.

Flooring Experts
Dr. Khan’s floor expert opined that the hospital floor was unreasonably slippery when wet. The defense’s floor expert, however, stated that the floor was not unreasonably slippery, even when wet.

Economic Harm
Dr. Kahn claimed that his inability to work after the injuries from the slippery floor cost him valuable ownership shares and dividends in US Anesthesia Partners. This entity bought Khan’s anesthesiology group prior to the incident. The purchase agreement stipulated that the shares in US Anesthesia that Dr. Khan was awarded were only vested if he continued working for five years. Khan sought $2,331,479 for his loss of the value of US Anesthesia shares and dividends.

Using experts to estimate his future earnings, Kahn sought a range of damages for future lost earnings. Dr. Kahn also sought $1,413,291 for the loss of his earning capacity. In addition, Tareq sought $100,000 in damages for each of his past physical pain and mental anguish, future physical pain and mental anguish, past physical impairment, and future physical impairment—totaling $400,000.

Who Won the Case?
An 11-1 jury found that the hospital’s negligence proximately caused Dr. Khan’s injuries. The finding was based on both medical negligence and premises liability.

Khan’s award for personal injuries totaled $4,235,693.

Expert Specialties
The plaintiff retained expert witnesses in:

Brain Injury/Trauma
General Surgery
Hospital Administration & Procedures
Economics
Floors
The defendant retained expert witnesses in:

Floors
Neurosurgery
Hospital Administration & Procedures
Key Takeaways
In this slip and fall case that happened in a hospital, the jury held the hospital accountable under both theories. The case reminds plaintiffs’ attorneys that using both medical negligence and a premises liability theory can be a smart strategy when the plaintiff’s injuries don’t relate to direct medical care. The “eggshell plaintiff” strategy also likely persuaded the jury to award higher damages and to disregard the defense expert’s claim that Dr. Kahn’s injuries were due to his prior conditions.

03/07/2023

Expert Institute Helps Meyers & Flowers Secure $43.5M Medical Malpractice Verdict for Former NFL Captain
Peter J. Flowers and Frank V. Cesarone of Meyers & Flowers, along with Dion G. Rassias and Jill Johnson of The Beasley Firm, secured a $43.5 million verdict for former Philadelphia Eagles player, Chris Maragos, after an orthopedic surgeon’s negligence resulted in a career-ending injury.

Kandace Watkins, J.D.
Written by Kandace Watkins, J.D.
— Updated on March 6, 2023

linkedin
facebook
twitter
icon
EXPERT SEARCH
Retain world-class experts

Connect with industry-leading professionals whose credentials meet all your case requirements

Request an expert
Request an expert
Expert Institute Helps Meyers & Flowers Secure $43.5M Medical Malpractice Verdict for Former NFL Captain
A Philadelphia County jury found orthopedic surgeon James Bradley and Rothman Orthopaedics Institute negligent in their treatment of the plaintiff, former Philadelphia Eagles’ safety and captain, Chris Maragos. The jury awarded Maragos $43.5 million in damages.

Background
On October 12, 2017, during a football game against the Carolina Panthers in Charlotte, North Carolina, Maragos suffered an injury to his right knee on a punt return. Maragos underwent an MRI at Rothman Orthopaedics Institute in Philadelphia. Following the scan, he was diagnosed with a torn right knee posterior cruciate ligament (PCL). Based upon Maragos’ MRI, Dr. Bradley performed surgery to treat the torn right knee PCL. Rothman Orthopaedics oversaw Maragos’ treatment and subsequent recovery.

In May 2018, Maragos underwent a second MRI that showed that his knee had not healed properly. More specifically, Maragos’ MRI revealed a torn meniscus, which was missed by Dr. Bradley.

Despite the MRI results, Dr. Bradley released Maragos for rehabilitation treatment on his right knee, including running on dry land. Following the recommended rehabilitation, Maragos complained of further complications. The undue stress on Maragos’ knee from rehabilitation ultimately resulted in the premature end of Maragos’ NFL career.

Since the surgery performed by Dr. Bradley and his subsequent rehabilitation activities, Maragos has had two additional surgeries to address his continued knee problems.

Maragos’ Allegations
Maragos and his attorneys, Peter J. Flowers and Frank V. Cesarone of Meyers & Flowers and Dion G. Rassias and Jill Johnson of The Beasley Firm, argued that Maragos suffered from a torn meniscus, of which Dr. Bradley was aware based upon the MRI. Moreover, according to Maragos, Dr. Bradley and Rothman failed to properly treat the torn meniscus. They also negligently released Maragos and advanced his activities to the point of permitting running on dry land. Maragos alleged that due to Dr. Bradley and Rothman’s negligent treatment of his knee, his knee endured undue stress. This, in turn, led to further complications of the tear and contributed to the end of Maragos’ football career.

On the other hand, the defendants alleged that Maragos’ meniscus was stable. Furthermore, the defense asserted that they were of the opinion that surgery was not the right option.

Super Bowl 2023 and the Trial
On Monday, February 13, the day after the Eagles lost to the Kansas City Chiefs in Super Bowl LVII, the jury returned a verdict against Dr. Bradley and Rothman.

Judge Charles J. Cunningham presided over the two-week trial in the Philadelphia County Court of Common Pleas. Witnesses for the plaintiff included former Eagles players Nick Foles, Trey Burton, and Jordan Hicks.

The attorney for the defendant doctor opined that the timing of the trial, between the Eagles’ NFC championship and Super Bowl loss, as well as the star-studded witness list, had an enormous impact.

Expert witnesses also played an integral role in the trial. Flowers worked with Expert Institute to find a radiologist who specialized in musculoskeletal imaging to provide an expert opinion that supported the case facts.

The Verdict and Future Implications
After three hours of deliberation, the Philadelphia County jury awarded $43.5 million to Maragos. The jury found Bradley and Rothman negligent in releasing Maragos to rehabilitation, which caused further damage to his right knee.

The jury found Dr. Bradley to be 67% negligent and Rothman 33% negligent. Maragos will receive $29.2 million and $14.3 million from the defendants respectively.

Maragos hopes that this verdict will encourage team doctors and trainers to prioritize the long-term health and well-being of the athletes rather than focusing on getting the player back on the field as soon as possible.

02/28/2023

Expert Witness: News you can Use
The jury returned the medical malpractice verdict against Athens Heart Center and Dr. Subodh Agrawal after a weeklong trial presided over by Judge Charles Auslander in Athens...onlineathens.com, Athens jury returns $4.3 million verdict in medical malpractice suit in man's death, Wayne Ford, Athens Banner-Herald, Feb 2023

The lawsuit was filed over the Aug. 25, 2017, death of Juan Molina, an Athens businessman who was also well known in the city’s music scene, where he performed with groups such as The Squalls that was active in the 1980s, and also Little Tigers and Go Van Go.

Juan Molina had gone to his physician and an EKG came back abnormal, so a cardiac catheterization was ordered at St. Mary’s Hospital to determine if he had a heart condition.

The doctor put the catheter into his ventricle wall, which you are not supposed to do, and injected a contrast or dye into the wall and that completely undermined the wall, which led to a perforation.

This caused complications and they were unable to stop the bleeding.

The trial began Jan. 30 and the case went to the jury on Feb. 6. A verdict was rendered just days later. The jury awarded $3.8 million for the value of life, $500,000 for pain and suffering and $63,000 for medical and funeral expenses.

11/22/2022

Iowa jury awards man $27M after he was sent home with the flu. It was really meningitis
Michaela Ramm
Des Moines Register

A Polk County jury has awarded a Des Moines man $27 million in damages after a local urgent care clinic failed to diagnose him with a serious meningitis infection that ultimately resulted in permanent brain damage.

The now-53-year-old Joseph Dudley still wrestles with the physical and mental limitations following his 2017 illness, which his wife says affects his ability to have an active role in his young children's lives.

When he first arrived at a UnityPoint Health urgent care clinic with symptoms in February 2017, he was diagnosed with influenza and sent home.

On Monday, the jury found the physician assistant supervising the clinic at the time, Melanie Choos, to be negligent in that decision, which directly caused damage to Dudley.

"This is a fair and just verdict for a man who has severe, permanent brain damage and who is one of tens of thousands of medical malpractice victims that have cases pending in this country," said Nick Rowley, a Decorah-based attorney representing Dudley and his wife, Sarah.

Other news:Most Iowa hospitals fail to comply with price transparency rule, leaving patients in the dark

UnityPoint Health officials declined to speak to details of the case but said Monday they believe the clinic met established standards of care. UnityPoint Health's lawyers also argued during the trial that the treatment Dudley received at the clinic met the standard of care based on the symptoms he presented when he arrived.

"We respect the jury process but strongly disagree with this verdict and are exploring all options, including an appeal. We support our providers and clinicians as they make important medical decisions each day," health system officials said in a statement Monday. "UnityPoint Clinic remains committed to providing compassionate, personalized care and meeting the highest standards of clinical quality and patient safety."

First came fatigue, dizziness; then he became delusional, combative
In February 2017, Joseph Dudley returned home complaining of fatigue and dizziness. He also developed a fever that grew worse over time, until his wife drove him to a Des Moines urgent care clinic a few hours later. By the time they arrived after 7 p.m., his fever was over 103 degrees.

By this time, Joseph Dudley was becoming delusional, acting erratic and combative as staff tried to conduct a nasal test.

More health news:RSV cases are on the rise in Iowa and across the US. When could we see a vaccine?

Sarah Dudley said when the physician assistant walked into the room to conduct the exam, she asked what illegal drugs her husband was taking and if he was withdrawing. Sarah Dudley said he does not do drugs, and that she couldn't help but feel her husband was treated badly because he is Black.

Choos diagnosed Joseph Dudley with influenza, even though a test for the flu came back negative. She then sent him home with Tamiflu and with recommendations for Sarah Dudley to bring him back to the clinic if symptoms had not improved in five to seven days.

“That was a death sentence for Joe," Rowley said.

Joseph Dudley, unable to walk because of dizziness, had to be placed in a wheelchair to leave the clinic. A clinic staff member helped Sarah Dudley load her husband into the car using a gait belt, she said.

"I had faith in them. I believed them," Sarah Dudley told the Des Moines Register following the jury verdict. "They’re doctors. They’re supposed to help people. I would never think at an urgent care clinic we would be treated this way."

According to Rowley, Choos was the only provider on staff and did not have a physician on site to supervise, which ultimately led to "sloppy, substandard medical care.

"Physician assistants shouldn’t be running clinics on their own without any supervising physician," Rowley said. "That shouldn’t happen in Iowa, but it is happening in Iowa and because of it, people are getting hurt and people are dying."

More health news:Iowa's first hospital closure in decades won't be the last. Can new licensing save them?

Joseph Dudley's condition didn't improve, and a few days later, on Feb. 20, 2017, Sarah Dudley took him to the emergency room at UnityPoint Iowa Methodist Medical Center. There, he was diagnosed with acute meningitis and placed in a medically induced coma.

'Every day of Joe’s life will be affected by … severe brain damage'
He spent eight days in the intensive care unit and was later transferred to the inpatient unit, where he remained until he was discharged on March 28, 2017.

Doctors later discovered he had suffered three strokes as a result of his infection. Joseph Dudley has permanently lost hearing in his right ear and suffered nerve damage in his right leg, meaning he can't walk in a straight line. He also has mood swings and deals with paranoia, Sarah Dudley said.

It took six months for him to relearn how to walk, first with a walker, then with a cane. He also underwent weeks of speech therapy and had to relearn to feed and bathe himself, Sarah Dudley said.

His physical condition has improved, but he's still unable to do some things, like go skating with his 6-year-old daughter. Sarah Dudley said it's challenging for their daughter to understand why her father can't always do things with her.

"Every day of Joe’s life will be affected by the severe brain damage he has," she said.

Still, Sarah Dudley said they are gratified by the verdict. The jury awarded the couple $12 million for future loss of full mind and body, and $10 million for future pain and suffering based on his life expectancy.

It also awarded them $2.5 million for past loss of body and mind function, and $2.5 million for past pain and suffering.

Michaela Ramm covers health care for the Des Moines Register. She can be reached at [email protected], at (319) 339-7354 or on Twitter at .

Iowa jury awards man $27M after he was sent home with the flu. It was really meningitis
Michaela Ramm
Des Moines Register

A Polk County jury has awarded a Des Moines man $27 million in damages after a local urgent care clinic failed to diagnose him with a serious meningitis infection that ultimately resulted in permanent brain damage.

The now-53-year-old Joseph Dudley still wrestles with the physical and mental limitations following his 2017 illness, which his wife says affects his ability to have an active role in his young children's lives.

When he first arrived at a UnityPoint Health urgent care clinic with symptoms in February 2017, he was diagnosed with influenza and sent home.

On Monday, the jury found the physician assistant supervising the clinic at the time, Melanie Choos, to be negligent in that decision, which directly caused damage to Dudley.

"This is a fair and just verdict for a man who has severe, permanent brain damage and who is one of tens of thousands of medical malpractice victims that have cases pending in this country," said Nick Rowley, a Decorah-based attorney representing Dudley and his wife, Sarah.

Other news:Most Iowa hospitals fail to comply with price transparency rule, leaving patients in the dark

UnityPoint Health officials declined to speak to details of the case but said Monday they believe the clinic met established standards of care. UnityPoint Health's lawyers also argued during the trial that the treatment Dudley received at the clinic met the standard of care based on the symptoms he presented when he arrived.

"We respect the jury process but strongly disagree with this verdict and are exploring all options, including an appeal. We support our providers and clinicians as they make important medical decisions each day," health system officials said in a statement Monday. "UnityPoint Clinic remains committed to providing compassionate, personalized care and meeting the highest standards of clinical quality and patient safety."

First came fatigue, dizziness; then he became delusional, combative
In February 2017, Joseph Dudley returned home complaining of fatigue and dizziness. He also developed a fever that grew worse over time, until his wife drove him to a Des Moines urgent care clinic a few hours later. By the time they arrived after 7 p.m., his fever was over 103 degrees.

By this time, Joseph Dudley was becoming delusional, acting erratic and combative as staff tried to conduct a nasal test.

More health news:RSV cases are on the rise in Iowa and across the US. When could we see a vaccine?

Sarah Dudley said when the physician assistant walked into the room to conduct the exam, she asked what illegal drugs her husband was taking and if he was withdrawing. Sarah Dudley said he does not do drugs, and that she couldn't help but feel her husband was treated badly because he is Black.

Choos diagnosed Joseph Dudley with influenza, even though a test for the flu came back negative. She then sent him home with Tamiflu and with recommendations for Sarah Dudley to bring him back to the clinic if symptoms had not improved in five to seven days.

“That was a death sentence for Joe," Rowley said.

Joseph Dudley, unable to walk because of dizziness, had to be placed in a wheelchair to leave the clinic. A clinic staff member helped Sarah Dudley load her husband into the car using a gait belt, she said.

"I had faith in them. I believed them," Sarah Dudley told the Des Moines Register following the jury verdict. "They’re doctors. They’re supposed to help people. I would never think at an urgent care clinic we would be treated this way."

According to Rowley, Choos was the only provider on staff and did not have a physician on site to supervise, which ultimately led to "sloppy, substandard medical care.

"Physician assistants shouldn’t be running clinics on their own without any supervising physician," Rowley said. "That shouldn’t happen in Iowa, but it is happening in Iowa and because of it, people are getting hurt and people are dying."

More health news:Iowa's first hospital closure in decades won't be the last. Can new licensing save them?

Joseph Dudley's condition didn't improve, and a few days later, on Feb. 20, 2017, Sarah Dudley took him to the emergency room at UnityPoint Iowa Methodist Medical Center. There, he was diagnosed with acute meningitis and placed in a medically induced coma.

'Every day of Joe’s life will be affected by … severe brain damage'
He spent eight days in the intensive care unit and was later transferred to the inpatient unit, where he remained until he was discharged on March 28, 2017.

Doctors later discovered he had suffered three strokes as a result of his infection. Joseph Dudley has permanently lost hearing in his right ear and suffered nerve damage in his right leg, meaning he can't walk in a straight line. He also has mood swings and deals with paranoia, Sarah Dudley said.

It took six months for him to relearn how to walk, first with a walker, then with a cane. He also underwent weeks of speech therapy and had to relearn to feed and bathe himself, Sarah Dudley said.

His physical condition has improved, but he's still unable to do some things, like go skating with his 6-year-old daughter. Sarah Dudley said it's challenging for their daughter to understand why her father can't always do things with her.

"Every day of Joe’s life will be affected by the severe brain damage he has," she said.

Still, Sarah Dudley said they are gratified by the verdict. The jury awarded the couple $12 million for future loss of full mind and body, and $10 million for future pain and suffering based on his life expectancy.

It also awarded them $2.5 million for past loss of body and mind function, and $2.5 million for past pain and suffering.

Michaela Ramm covers health care for the Des Moines Register. She can be reached at [email protected], at (319) 339-7354 or on Twitter at .

Address

152 Woodstoack Avenue, Ste B
Rutland, VT
05701

Opening Hours

Monday 9am - 5pm
Tuesday 9am - 5pm
Wednesday 9am - 5pm
Thursday 9am - 5pm
Friday 9am - 5pm

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when Law Offices of Thomas C. Bixby, LLC posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Contact The Practice

Send a message to Law Offices of Thomas C. Bixby, LLC:

Share