Alternative Litigation Solutions

Call Directions Website Contact the practice

Alternative Litigation Solutions Alternative Litigation Solutions (ADR) through binding arbitration or mediation is an efficient alternative to the time and expense of a jury trial.

10/09/2026

Philadelphia County Settlement at Mediation: $250,000.00:

This matter arose from a rear end motor vehicle accident in which Plaintiff claimed personal injury, mostly to his cervical spine. Although the physical damage to Plaintiff's vehicle was rather minor, Plaintiff argued he had no prior history injury. Plaintiff also claimed unpaid medical bills, and wage loss approximating $68,000.00; Plaintiff also asserted a claim for future medical bills. The defense argued the impact was rather minor and that many of Plaintiff's claims were not supported by the evidence, particularly the claim for future medical expenses. Ultimately, the Parties were able to arrive at a very fair, amicable settlement without incurring costs of trial and the unpredictability of a jury trial.

08/05/2026

Delaware County Settlement at Mediation:
$175,000.00:

This premises liability action arose from an alleged slip and fall on a recently mopped floor in a department store. Plaintiff, an employee of the store, claimed she fell after a cleaning service mopped the floor and did not provide notice that the floor had been mopped. Plaintiff claimed various spinal injurie as well as a severe sprain to her ankle. Defendants denied liability and relied heavily on Plaintiff's Deposition testimony wherein her testimony was exceptionally weak in terms of what the condition of the floor looked like, and did not look like, at the time of the fall. Compounding efforts to settle the matter, Plaintiff was subject to a workers compensation lien of approximately $65,000.00. Due in no small part by how compelling Plaintiff was as a witness, the Parties were able to effectuate an amicable settlement and avoid the risk of trial in a conservative venue.

07/28/2026

Philadelphia County Settlement at Mediation: $100,000.00:

This matter arose from a "head-on" motor vehicle accident in which the damage to the vehicles was rather extensive. Plaintiff was "full tort" and claimed personal injury, predominantly to her right knee and which included a partial tear of the medial collateral ligament (MCL) and patellar tendon. Plaintiff also claimed approximately $10,000.00 in unpaid medical bills and wage loss. Buttressing the Plaintiff's claim, the defense expert agreed Plaintiff sustained the injuries to her knee but was fully recovered. Defendant's claim was supported by the evidence that Plaintiff treated merely for three (3) months, and her own expert agreed no further treatment or follow-up was necessary. A fair and amicable settlement indeed before both Parties incurred costs of trial.

07/15/2026

$1,000,000.00 policy limits apportioned:

This case came to me from counsel who represented the driver and three (3) passengers in a significant motor vehicle accident. All four (4) claimants sustained serious injuries including spinal fractures, rib fractures, liver lacerations, and collapsed lungs. One claimant required a total hip arthroplasty while another claimant sustained a fractured ankle which required open reduction and internal fixation. Yet another claimant sustained bilateral hip fractures but did not require surgery. All claimants sustained wage loss. All claimants had significant medical bills. The insurance carrier for the tortfeasor "tendered" the full policy limits but left apportionment to counsel. In doing so, a potential "conflict of interest" arose in than any recommendation by counsel for apportionment may render the clients' interests "adverse" to each other and to counsel. See, Pennsylvania Rule of Professional Conduct 1.7 "Conflict of Interest: Current Clients." To resolve the conflict, all claimants agreed to submit the entire universe of injuries to me for binding apportionment. After review, I was able to apportion the entire settlement proceeds to all claimants in what I determined was fair under the circumstances. This scenario is very common in the practice and counsel should be aware of the potential conflict of interest. Apportioning the proceeds in a manner such as this, where counsel represents multiple parties, insulates counsel from any claims of malfeasance and conflicts of interest.

06/25/2026

Philadelphia County Settlement at Mediation: $125,000.00:

Plaintiff was leaving work in a strip mall and fell on snow/ice which had accumulated in the parking lot during an active snowstorm. She sustained a fractured wrist which required surgery and the implantation of screws. She brought a claim against multiple entities including the snow removal contractor. Defendants argued no "duty" had yet arisen because snow accumulation at the time of the fall was minimal and the fall was during an active snowstorm. Thus, Pennsylvania's "hills and ridges" doctrine precluded any recovery. Ultimately, all Parties agreed the risks and expense in proceeding to trial outweighed continuing to prosecute and defend the case. A very amicable settlement was procured.

05/01/2026

Philadelphia Settlement at Mediation:
$650,000.00:

This case arose from a contested liability, intersectional accident where each driver claimed to have entered the intersection on a green light. Plaintiff claimed injury, predominantly to his lumbar spine for which he ultimately underwent spinal surgery. In addition, Plaintiff was asserting economic damages of approximately $270,000.00. The defense argued this accident was relatively minor in nature and also pointed out that Plaintiff was involved in a subsequent accident approximately one (1) month later. However, my evaluation of Plaintiff during our private session was that he would present exceptionally well in front of a Philadelphia jury. Moreover, Plaintiff indicated he was not in any manner injured in the subsequent accident and there were no medical records to indicate he sought any treatment or made any type of claim. Compounding the medical analysis, the surgeon inadvertently lacerated a vein which caused significant blood loss and additional hospital expense, something which Pennsylvania Law likely would consider a "foreseeable" consequence and permit Plaintiff to argue was an additional compensable injury. I was asked to provide a detailed analysis and recommendation to Defendant's insurer after which I was able to successfully settle this case. It was a very good result under the circumstances.

Address

Philadelphia, PA

Opening Hours

Monday 9am - 5pm
Tuesday 9am - 5pm
Wednesday 9am - 5pm
Thursday 9am - 5pm
Friday 9am - 5pm

Telephone

+12152510783

Website

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when Alternative Litigation Solutions posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Contact The Practice

Send a message to Alternative Litigation Solutions:

Shortcuts

Share

Category