Goldstein Mehta LLC

Goldstein Mehta LLC Philadelphia Criminal Defense Lawyers - Goldstein Mehta LLC.

The Philadelphia criminal defense lawyers of Goldstein Mehta LLC will fight for your rights at trial or on appeal. Our attorneys have successfully defended thousands of cases in Philadelphia and the surrounding counties, and we can help with all types of state and federal charges in Pennsylvania and New Jersey. We are understanding and thorough attorneys who will use our skills and expertise to help you get the best possible result when dealing with serious criminal charges.

goldsteinmehta.com/blog/third-circuit-covid-era-courtroom-closure-and-marshals-blocking-the-defendants-mothers-entry-vio...
05/29/2026

goldsteinmehta.com/blog/third-circuit-covid-era-courtroom-closure-and-marshals-blocking-the-defendants-mothers-entry-violated-the-sixth-amendment-but-convictions-affirmed-anyway

The United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit has decided United States v. Girard and United States v. Harry , Nos. 24-2097 & 24-2148 (3d Cir. May 26, 2026), holding that the District Court violated the defendants’ Sixth Amendment right to a public trial twice during a federal

goldsteinmehta.com/blog/pa-superior-court-intent-to-violate-a-pfa-order-can-support-a-burglary-conviction
05/28/2026

goldsteinmehta.com/blog/pa-superior-court-intent-to-violate-a-pfa-order-can-support-a-burglary-conviction

The Pennsylvania Superior Court has decided the case of Commonwealth v. Bryant , holding that a defendant who enters a residence in violation of a Protection from Abuse order may be convicted of burglary, even when the only criminal intent the Commonwealth proved was the intent to violate the PFA i

goldsteinmehta.com/blog/pa-supreme-court-shotspotter-alert-plus-furtive-movements-and-walking-away-provides-reasonable-s...
05/23/2026

goldsteinmehta.com/blog/pa-supreme-court-shotspotter-alert-plus-furtive-movements-and-walking-away-provides-reasonable-suspicion

The Pennsylvania Supreme Court has decided Commonwealth v. Foster , No. 12 WAP 2024 (Pa. May 19, 2026), holding that the totality of the circumstances supported reasonable suspicion to detain the defendant after a ShotSpotter alert reported gunfire on a residential block at 2:00 a.m. The Court decl

goldsteinmehta.com/blog/pa-supreme-court-a-district-attorney-cannot-walk-away-from-a-filed-case-without-the-trial-courts...
05/13/2026

goldsteinmehta.com/blog/pa-supreme-court-a-district-attorney-cannot-walk-away-from-a-filed-case-without-the-trial-courts-approval

The Pennsylvania Supreme Court has decided Commonwealth v. Harrison , holding that a trial court still gets the final say on whether a district attorney may abandon a case by entering a nolle prosequi or nolle prosse . The Court reaffirmed the old Reinhart test: the Commonwealth’s reason for dro

goldsteinmehta.com/blog/pa-superior-court-continues-eliminating-strunks-limits-on-the-unlawful-contact-with-a-minor-stat...
05/11/2026

goldsteinmehta.com/blog/pa-superior-court-continues-eliminating-strunks-limits-on-the-unlawful-contact-with-a-minor-statute

The Pennsylvania Superior Court has decided the case of Commonwealth v. Smith , 2026 PA Super 69, affirming two convictions for unlawful contact with a minor on remand from the Pennsylvania Supreme Court. The Supreme Court had sent the case back so the Superior Court could reconsider it in light of

goldsteinmehta.com/blog/not-guilty-attorney-goldstein-wins-full-acquittal-in-first-degree-murder-case
05/06/2026

goldsteinmehta.com/blog/not-guilty-attorney-goldstein-wins-full-acquittal-in-first-degree-murder-case

Philadelphia Criminal Defense Attorney Zak T. Goldstein, Esquire of Goldstein Mehta LLC recently won a full acquittal at trial on charges of first-degree murder, attempted murder, burglary, and Violations of the Uniform Fi****ms Act in Commonwealth v. R.B. The jury found the client not guilty on e

goldsteinmehta.com/blog/pa-supreme-court-malice-is-malice-no-heightened-standard-for-third-degree-murder-in-dui-cases
05/05/2026

goldsteinmehta.com/blog/pa-supreme-court-malice-is-malice-no-heightened-standard-for-third-degree-murder-in-dui-cases

The Pennsylvania Supreme Court has decided the case of Commonwealth v. Peters , affirming the defendant’s convictions for third-degree murder and aggravated assault arising out of a fatal DUI crash on Interstate 95 and rejecting the argument that DUI cases are governed by a heightened, “essentia...

goldsteinmehta.com/blog/pa-superior-court-jurors-briefly-seeing-victims-service-dog-outside-courthouse-does-not-warrant-...
04/30/2026

goldsteinmehta.com/blog/pa-superior-court-jurors-briefly-seeing-victims-service-dog-outside-courthouse-does-not-warrant-new-trial

The Pennsylvania Superior Court has decided the case of Commonwealth v. Roberts , 2026 PA Super 65 (March 30, 2026), affirming the defendant's conviction and holding that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying the defendant's motion for a new trial based on jurors briefly seeing th

goldsteinmehta.com/blog/pa-superior-court-police-do-not-need-a-warrant-to-get-your-internet-subscriber-info
04/25/2026

goldsteinmehta.com/blog/pa-superior-court-police-do-not-need-a-warrant-to-get-your-internet-subscriber-info

On April 22, 2026, the Pennsylvania Superior Court decided Commonwealth v. Zealor , 2026 PA Super 81, holding that police and prosecutors do not need a search warrant to obtain subscriber information, payment information, and internet connection records from an internet service provider. Instead, p

Address

1717 Arch Street, Suite 320
Philadelphia, PA
19103

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when Goldstein Mehta LLC posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Contact The Practice

Send a message to Goldstein Mehta LLC:

Share