Nelson & Yarnell

Nelson & Yarnell Nelson & Yarnell is a Kansas Family Law trial and appellate law firm.

Ronald W Nelson PA is a Kansas Divorce, Famliy Law and Appellate Practice Law Firm (separation and divorce, paternity, and cohabitation and issues surrounding domestic relations), with special emphasis on complex interstate and international family law issues, jurisdiction, spousal and child support, child custody, and interstate and international child abduction.

04/06/2026

NOTICE OF JUDICIAL POSITION VACANCY
The 10th Judicial District Nominating Commission will convene on June 10-11, 2026, to interview and select nominees whose names will be submitted to the Governor for appointment to the position of District Judge, 10th Judicial District. The vacancy is due to the retirement of the Hon. David Hauber effective on April 1, 2026.

All applications for this position must be drafted on the current application form which is available from the clerk of the district court in Johnson County. In addition, nomination forms are available from the Clerk of the Appellate Courts (Topeka); at https://www.kscourts.org/Judges/Become-a-Judge and at http://www.jocojnc.org/index.aspx.
The deadline to submit an application with supporting documents is Noon, Friday, May 1, 2026.
https://www.kscourts.gov/KSCourts/media/KsCourts/Judges/Nominating-Commissions/10th-Judicial-District-Nominating-Commission.pdf

Last week, Kansas Governor Laura Kelly signed House Bill 2393, authorizing the Kansas Supreme Court to impose a charge t...
04/06/2026

Last week, Kansas Governor Laura Kelly signed House Bill 2393, authorizing the Kansas Supreme Court to impose a charge to fund the costs of nonjudicial personnel through June 30, 2030. The bill extends the judicial branch surcharge on various docket fees through June 30, 2030. The fees are deposited into the state general fund. The bill passed 25-15 in the Senate and 117-7 in the House.

Governor Governor signs distracted driving bill into law, nine others By Brad Cooper - April 3, 2026 0 1681 Share FacebookXPinterestWhatsApp Gov. Laura Kelly on Friday a signed into law a bill that limits drivers from using cellphones in school zones and areas where road construction is underway. Th...

An ongoing, widespread text message scam gives its targets "final notice" that they face harsh penalties if they don't p...
04/06/2026

An ongoing, widespread text message scam gives its targets "final notice" that they face harsh penalties if they don't pay money they owe Johnson County District Court while offering a QR code it claims they can use to pay.

Recipients must not click on any links or send money, the Johnson County Sheriff's Office said April 5 on its page.

The county actually never uses QR codes to collect payments, the post said.

An ongoing text message scam falsely tells targets they face harsh penalties if they don't pay money they owe Johnson County District Court.

The American Bar Association on Monday condemned Donald Trump's "personal attacks" against U.S. Supreme Court justices a...
02/24/2026

The American Bar Association on Monday condemned Donald Trump's "personal attacks" against U.S. Supreme Court justices after Friday's 6-3 decision struck a blow to his tariff policy, saying the remarks "cross a dangerous line that threatens the safety of the judiciary and our judicial process."

"The recent remarks by the president of the United States, leveling personal criticisms against members of the U.S. Supreme Court, are not acceptable and cross a dangerous line that threatens the safety of the judiciary and our judicial process. These remarks, following the Supreme Court’s ruling on tariffs, referring to the justices as “a disgrace to our nation” and “disloyal to the Constitution,” threaten to erode public confidence in the judiciary.

"While judicial opinions are always subject to analysis and critique, such disagreement must be voiced with respect for the facts and the law and must respect the independence and integrity of the courts. Personal attacks against individual justices, particularly allegations that they are influenced by “foreign interests,” are wholly inappropriate. Such statements risk undermining the rule of law and the public’s faith in an impartial judiciary, foundational pillars of our democracy that have guided our nation since its founding.

"The American Bar Association calls upon all leaders, including the president of the United States, to exercise restraint in public discourse concerning the judiciary. We urge fellow bar associations to defend the critical work of our courts and all Americans to uphold the principles of respect, civility and the rule of law that sustain our democratic institutions."

CHICAGO, Feb. 23, 2026 — The recent remarks by the president of the United States, leveling personal criticisms against members of the U.S. Supreme Court, are not acceptable and cross a dangerous line that threatens the safety of the judiciary and ou

Currently, pregnant women in Missouri can file for divorce, but a judge could prevent it from being finalized. The Misso...
02/14/2026

Currently, pregnant women in Missouri can file for divorce, but a judge could prevent it from being finalized. The Missouri House yesterday unanimously approved a bill removing that barrier for pregnant women seeking divorce.

It now goes to the Missouri Senate, where similar legislation has already had a hearing, but not a full vote yet.

The legislation has the backing of Gov. Mike Kehoe, who requested it be passed during his State of the State address.

Currently, pregnant women in Missouri can file for divorce, but a judge could prevent it from being finalized. House lawmakers voted 147-0 to pass a bill removing that barrier.

Why do legal writers resist or dismiss plain language? Joseph Kimble addressed that question in his book Writing for Dol...
02/13/2026

Why do legal writers resist or dismiss plain language? Joseph Kimble addressed that question in his book Writing for Dollars, Writing to Please: “You can point to an assortment of reasons ... but ... they come down to ... lack of will, lack of skill and lack of time.”

Why do legal writers resist or dismiss plain language? I addressed that question in my book Writing for Dollars, Writing to Please: “You can point to an assortment of reasons ... but ... they come down to ... lack of will, lack of skill and lack of time.” I’ve explored each of these three reas...

Dear Carolyn: I am divorced. My ex-husband physically abused me. There is no way to keep him out of my life completely b...
01/16/2026

Dear Carolyn: I am divorced. My ex-husband physically abused me. There is no way to keep him out of my life completely because we have minor children together and there are court orders saying he has rights to visit, attend school events, etc. I have decided the best thing for my children is to be there for all their events and to be civil toward their father when he’s around.

I’m now in my first post-divorce relationship, with a wonderful man. Wonderful to me, wonderful to my kids, wonderful according to all my friends and family who talk about how relieved they are that he’s so unlike my ex. He has never met my ex and tells me he would have a very hard time being civil toward the man who abused me.

My kids ask him to attend their games or school performances, and he declines if their dad will be there with vague answers like, “I think it would be best if I sat this one out.”

I envision marrying and spending the rest of my life with him. Realistically, there’s no way he will never meet the father of my children, right? So at some point, he’s going to have to find a way to be civil to my ex. How do I help him get to that point?

Anonymous: This is one of those things that is completely understandable, until it isn’t.

Of course he would have a hard time being civil to the man who abused you. I hope everyone reading this would. Come on.

But. You’re civil to him. And you’re the one with the least interest of any us in being civil, because you’re the one he hurt.

The difference is that you aren’t making the calculation based only on yourself and what you want and need. You include your children’s needs in your math. The result: civility to the man who hurt you.

Back to your new man. We know his math = very hard time being civil. But what we don’t know — or what you haven’t told us — is whether he has included what anyone else wants or needs in his math.

This is what I suggest you ask him. “I understand this decision for you. I would feel the same way about meeting someone who hurt my friend.”

Then: “For obvious reasons, it’s important for me to know whether, and when, the kids’ needs and mine will ever change your math.”

No rush on an answer. This is something you want him to sit with, try on, carry. A session together with a therapist might help you both play out how a meeting might go.

Your relief to be with someone “wonderful” must be palpable. Just to live without the imminent threat of harm from a loved one is something everyone deserves.

Please be mindful, though, of habituation. Your ex didn’t hurt you physically out of nowhere; it was the extreme expression of priorities centered on himself, his needs and his feelings, with you as the accessory.

People can be self-centered without inflicting physical harm on others, and even without the meanness; in other words, there are much less extreme expressions. Because you were in a marriage where your needs and feelings were discounted by force, there’s a risk you will miss these subtler expressions. To you, they may read, emotionally, as normal or familiar.

I am not saying your new man is this way, or that habituation is destiny, or anything like that. But this is your first relationship since your divorce, and you’re having marriage projections already, and your kids are asking this would-be dad openly to meet an emotional need of theirs … and he’s walking away.

Making a partner’s history about oneself would be a point of valid concern about any potential spouse, for anyone. But if this man can’t stop centering himself in dealing with your ex, given what you and your kids have been through, then please have the courage to make it the issue that breaks the deal.

Letter writer’s kids want her new man at their events, but he said he would have “a very hard time being civil” to their father.

Kansas Supreme Court Chief Justice Eric Rosen pressed the Kansas Legislature on Tuesday to expand funding for specialty ...
01/14/2026

Kansas Supreme Court Chief Justice Eric Rosen pressed the Kansas Legislature on Tuesday to expand funding for specialty courts tailored to defendants' unique challenges and asked lawmakers to collaborate on solutions to the shortage of attorneys in rural Kansas in his first State of the Kansas Judiciary speech.

Eric Rosen, chief justice of the Kansas Supreme Court, asks legislators to add funding for specialty courts and to bring more lawyers to rural Kansas.

A pregnant, 14-year-old Nebraska girl's 2005 marriage to a 22-year-old man in Kansas prompted Kansas state lawmakers to ...
01/10/2026

A pregnant, 14-year-old Nebraska girl's 2005 marriage to a 22-year-old man in Kansas prompted Kansas state lawmakers to first establish a minimum marriage age in 2006.

The girl who had gotten pregnant by a Nebraska man crossed the state line from Nebraska into Kansas and married with the consent of the girl's mother. The man had been having s*x with the girl illegally, but they married legally anyway -- because of the girl's mother's consent and the state of Kansas law at the time.

Kansas lawmakers responded in 2006 by enacting restrictions that are part of KSA 23-2505, the statute that bans anyone younger than 15 from getting married in Kansas.

Kansas Legislators have have since then repeatedly introduced legislation to stop child marriage with parental consent -- an obvious loophole in the law that continues to allow child-rape.

A bill to ban child marriage was introduced on January 16, 2025, by Rep. Stephanie Clayton (D-Johnson County). It would change Kansas law to mandate that a person must be at least 18 years of age to get married, and it would also eliminate exceptions currently recognized by Kansas law (parental consent). Rep. Clayton filed the same bill in 2021 (2021HB2422) and 2024 (2024HB2046).

A pregnant 14-year-old's 2005 Kansas marriage to a 22-year-old man prompted the state to set a minimum marriage age the following year.

Why is January a busy month for divorce? While many people spend January working to shed weight, some prepare to shed a ...
01/02/2026

Why is January a busy month for divorce?

While many people spend January working to shed weight, some prepare to shed a partner. Family lawyer and celebrity attorney Randy Kessler joins Sharon Lawson to talk about why January is known as divorce month. But wait until Valentines Day for the real fireworks.

While many people spend January working to shed weight, some may be preparing to shed a partner. Family lawyer and celebrity attorney Randy Kessler joins Sharon Lawson to talk about why January is known as divorce month.

The major "mailbox rule change" is a new USPS policy, effective December 24, 2025, where machine postmarks now reflect t...
12/30/2025

The major "mailbox rule change" is a new USPS policy, effective December 24, 2025, where machine postmarks now reflect the date mail is first processed at a regional facility, not when dropped off, potentially making time-sensitive mail (like tax returns, ballots, legal filings) late, even if mailed on time. The key workaround is mailing earlier, going inside the post office to request a hand postmark, or getting a receipt to prove the actual mailing date, as the old "mailbox rule" (mail is postmarked when deposited) is no less reliable due to operational shifts.
https://www.currentfederaltaxdevelopments.com/blog/2025/12/8/usps-changes-to-postmark-date-system-taking-effect-december-24-2025 #:~:text=Summary%20of%20the%20Final%20Rule,first%20accepted%20by%20the%20USPS.

The "conservative" litigation group America First Legal Foundation cannot demand documents from the federal Judicial Con...
12/22/2025

The "conservative" litigation group America First Legal Foundation cannot demand documents from the federal Judicial Conference of the U.S. and the Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts under the Freedom of Information Act because they are not executive agencies, a D.C. federal judge ruled Thursday.
https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.dcd.279777/gov.uscourts.dcd.279777.27.0_4.pdf

Address

11020 King Street, Suite 300
Overland Park, KS
66210

Opening Hours

Monday 8am - 5pm
Tuesday 8am - 5pm
Wednesday 8am - 5pm
Thursday 8am - 5pm
Friday 8am - 5pm

Telephone

+19133122500

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when Nelson & Yarnell posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Share