Their triggered response, as seen by observers, is similar to the canine’s response to the dog whistle of the Russian scientist Pavlov. Just as the signal of his whistle encouraged the canine’s brain to stimulate a salivating mouth, so too does the name O.J. Simpson generate a similar reflexive response. Without a thought as to whether the meat consumed was tainted, Pavlov’s dogs s psychologically
manipulated hunger simply circumvented any concern regarding the integrity of their master and the meat that was thrown at them. North Americans are repetitively exposed to a similar experience regarding O.J. Their brains are stimulated to believe and to respond to only what they’ve been told. Without question they act in a similar manner as Pavlov’s dogs. At some point Pavlov ceased conducting his psychological experiment. However, in the case of North America, it appears that as it relates to O.J. Simpson, there is no cognizable arbiter willing to examine the condition of the tidbits served to a persistently hungering audience, nor to tell the instigator when it is reasonably time to cease. Sadly, with the exception of a limited few journalists of the national press, they too have willingly stood at the same feeding trough, reflexively consuming a continuum of this tainted meat with little thought as to its potential damaging consequences. They are the ones to which this book, my second on this subject, mainly focuses because they have a higher obligation. Over the last eighteen years relative to the O.J. Simpson case, these sleeping journalists have abandoned their own oath of loyalty in preserving the integrity of their esteemed profession that comes with inheriting the trusteeship of the Fourth Estate, namely the power of the press. Harrington Johnson
Investigative Team Member
OMIG (Ocean Medical Investigative Group)
Los Angeles, California
