03/03/2023
Brain activity is presumably the source of our thoughts, feelings, soul, and identity. But how?
Neuroscience aims to understand this question and thus has become an area of interest for the court of law and the public.
Modern neuroscience is exciting and challenging in the courtroom. It can be used to reveal amazingly hidden data and clarify brain function for the trier of fact. However, neuroscientific data can also, at times, be misleading. It can be used manipulatively as a shiny and distracting object, implying false exactitude that currently lacks. For example, modern neuroscientific imaging is sexy, multicolored, and attention-grabbing. However, it can also be employed to misrepresent, mislead, and confuse the jury by presenting as dispositive truth what is, at best, only scientific conjecture.
Therefore, it behooves every trial attorney who is either introducing or confronting modern neuroscientific data to understand the limits of what it can reveal as scientific truth… as well as what it currently cannot.
At fpamed, we have a team of neuropsychiatrists who use behavioral evidence and neuroevidence, such as brain scans, to provide evidence-based opinions. We are uniquely trained to understand the incredible abilities of science but also understand its limitations.
Learn what neuroscience can and cannot answer:https://fpamed.com/wp-content/uploads/Choi-2017-JAPPL-editorial-What-neuroscience-can-and-cannot-answer.pdf