02/26/2026
Some serious ethical issues have arisen for Polk Countyâs Judge SYDNEY BROWN MURPHY. In a recent review of Judge MURPHYâs Facebook profile, MURPHY posted a linked article pertaining to feral hog management in encroaching urban developments. But maybe its MURPHY, herself, who is feral.
Any incumbent candidate running for office knows the importance of ethics with respect to campaign management. Strict guidelines prohibit the interference of political agendas with taxpayer resources. Such breaches can cross ethical, moral, legal, and lawful issues alike. In a recent planned event for the Polk County Judgeâs re-election, SYDNEY MURPHY was stopped in the midst of making some big campaign errors.
Thanks to the watchful eyes of Attorney Lana Shadwick, Former Polk County District Attorney William âLeeâ Hon, and Attorney Aaron Tyler Epstein; they quickly addressed a political nightmare that was about to have unfolded.
SUSAN TIETZ, the Program Coordinator for the Courthouse Preservation Program of the Texas Historical Commission was operating in cahoots with Judge MURPHY. TIETZ sent a February 26, 2026, email that damningly conveyed a plan to dupe the public. The email, by TIETZ, stated, âPR campaign to improve community support for the project (and stave off Judge Murphyâs competition in the upcoming election).â The âtown hallâ meeting was a deliberate ruse to influence the Republican primary in favor of Judge SYDNEY MURPHY through political cover. All of this was said to taken place at a local school.
Had the âtown hallâ meeting proceeded, Judge MURPHY, SUSAN TIETZ, and possibly others could have faced a host of charges and fines. But that item may not be entirely removed from the menu. Statutorily, the meeting would have violated Texas Penal Code 39.02 ABUSE OF OFFICIAL CAPACITY. Using government resources for benefit or to bring injury and harm, in this instance, would qualify as a first-degree felony.
But TIETZ and âQueenâ SYDNEY MURPHY arenât in the clear. According to the Texas Election Code §255.003, public funds being utilized by officers, employees, or political subdivisions for political advertising are prohibited. A violation could sustain a Class A misdemeanor charge.
More clearly, under Texas Election Code §251.001(16) "any communication supporting or opposing a candidate for public office or office of a political party" and communications "supporting or opposing a political party, a public officer, or a measureâ would be in violation of the Ethics Code. The TIETZ email appears to have met this code infraction.
The recent illegal plans by MURPHY and TIETZ give rise to even more (criminality) concerns. The Texas Historical Commission receives federal funding. As well, the âtown hallâ was scheduled to have taken place in a school building, another recipient of federal funding. MURPHY and TIETZ could have cunningly manipulated the outcomes of the Polk County Judgeâs race by violating federal law with respect to the Hatch Act by using government resources and political persuasion. According âLeeâ Hon, âThey were using multiple government resources for a political deal five days before the election.â
Shadwickâs email was a viable attempt to hold officials accountable and maintain fairness for voters. The town hall meeting has been called off. This response came after Governor Greg Abbott, the Texas Historical Commissionâs Executive Director Joseph Bell, and THC Chairman Nau were advised of the scheme. Also included in Shadwickâs email were the Polk County Commissioners and TIETZ and MURPHY.
To view the Shadwick, Hon, & Epstein email sent to alert officials, click on the following link.
https://www.facebook.com/share/p/1AdrRUY2nt/
If you liked this content, please make a donation: https://cash.app/$TOCSExpose