The Maridon Law Firm

03/18/2026

New press release:
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
March 18, 2026
Contact:
Joseph R. Maridon, Jr.
Attorney at Law
The Maridon Law Firm / LV Traffic Ticket Guy
Phone: (702) 970-4224
Las Vegas, Nevada
Clark County’s Rural Justice Courts Plagued by Administrative Dysfunction—Calls for Immediate Accountability
What has Karen Powell done for you lately?
LAS VEGAS, NV — Clark County taxpayers and residents of the Outlying/Rural Justice Courts (Moapa, Searchlight, Boulder City, Laughlin, Mesquite, Bunkerville, Goodsprings, and Moapa Valley) deserve straight answers about the performance of Court Administrator Karen Powell, who oversees these courts under the direct supervision of Deputy County Manager Daniel Stewart.
For more than 15 years, attorneys and litigants have faced relentless administrative dysfunction in Powell’s domain: attorney calls from identified business lines ignored indefinitely (while blocked or unknown numbers get immediate answers), voicemails that go unanswered across all Clark County justice courts, and essential records withheld or misclassified—often requiring District Court orders just to enforce basic compliance with the law.
A glaring recent example: In Eighth Judicial District Court Case No. A-26-940042-A (appeal from Searchlight Township Justice Court), the District Court had to intervene, ordering the justice court to produce a required transcript within 30 days or justify delay. The court had refused to release the JAVS recording (labeled “confidential” and internal-use-only under AO-1-2025) and failed to transmit the official record as required by EDCR 9.06. This is not isolated; it’s symptomatic of a long pattern under Powell’s administration that burdens defendants, attorneys, and the judicial system as a whole.
Powell’s history adds context: She was previously terminated from Clark County employment, then filed a federal lawsuit in 2019 (Cale-Powell v. Clark County et al., Case No. 2:19-cv-00981) challenging that termination before being reinstated to her current role. Complaints about these persistent issues frequently reach Deputy County Manager Daniel Stewart, who supervises Powell and the outlying courts—yet he routinely forwards them to the Clark County “Legal” department, conveniently shielding the problems from direct resolution.
To the elected Justices of the Peace in the Outlying/Rural Justice Courts—Judge Ruth Kolhoss (Moapa Township), Judge Chris Jeter (Searchlight Township), Judge Christopher Tilman (Boulder City Township), Judge Gregor Mills (Moapa Valley Township), and the judges of Laughlin, Mesquite, Bunkerville, and Goodsprings—you have real authority and discretion here. Unlike centralized county operations, rural township judges are not bound to the current administrative setup. You can choose who administers your courts and how they serve the public. You can demand leadership that ensures open access, efficient operations, compliance with court rules and procedural requirements, and actual responsiveness to defendants and counsel—rather than practices that invite higher-court mandates, delay justice, and erode public confidence in the courts.
By allowing Karen Powell’s tyrannical reign of inefficiency, stonewalling, and selective access to continue unchallenged, you yourselves become the tyrants. Your inaction perpetuates barriers to justice in your own courtrooms, prejudices the constitutional rights of the people you swore to serve, and forces unnecessary escalations that waste public resources. The power to end this lies with you—choose accountability over complicity.
Clark County’s rural communities should not have to battle this hard for basic court access. Defendants’ due process rights should never depend on administrative whims. Taxpayers should not fund a system that routinely requires District Court compulsion to function properly.
It’s past time for change. The rural Justices of the Peace have the authority to select better administration. The question for them—and for every resident they serve—is inescapable:
What has Karen Powell done for you lately?
About The Maridon Law Firm / LV Traffic Ticket Guy
The Maridon Law Firm, led by Attorney Joseph R. Maridon, Jr., is committed to fighting for clients’ rights and advocating for fair, effective court administration throughout Clark County and beyond. For more information or assistance, contact us at (702) 970-4224 or visit maridonlaw.com.
# # #

06/09/2025

How to Spot a Fake Text Message

In recent days, many have received text messages claiming to be from the DMV or the Court. The Nevada DMV and Nevada Courts do not send text messages, so these are likely scams designed to steal your personal information or money. Here’s how to identify and protect yourself from fake text messages:

1. Check the Sender’s Number

Legitimate organizations rarely use random or personal phone numbers. Official messages from agencies typically come from short codes (e.g., 5-6 digit numbers) or clearly branded numbers, but in Nevada, the DMV and courts do not use text messaging at all.

Red flag: Messages from a 10-digit number, especially with an unfamiliar area code, or international numbers.

2. Look for Poor Grammar or Spelling

Official communications are usually polished and professional.

Red flag: Typos, awkward phrasing, or unprofessional language like excessive emojis or slang.

3. Verify Links Carefully

Scammers often include links to fake websites that steal your data.

Red flag: URLs that don’t match official websites (e.g., “dmv-secure.com” instead of “dmv.nv.gov”). Hover over links (without clicking) to check the actual URL, and never click suspicious links.

4. Be Wary of Urgent or Threatening Language

Scammers use fear tactics, like claiming your license is suspended or you owe fines, to pressure quick action.

Red flag: Demands for immediate payment or personal information with threats of legal action or penalties.

5. Don’t Share Personal Information

Legitimate agencies like the DMV or courts won’t ask for sensitive details (e.g., Social Security numbers, passwords, or credit card info) via text.

Red flag: Requests for personal or financial information through text or linked forms.

6. Confirm Through Official Channels

If you’re unsure, contact the Nevada DMV or court directly using verified contact information from their official website (e.g., dmv.nv.gov or nvcourts.gov). Don’t use phone numbers or links provided in the text.

What to Do if You Receive a Suspicious Text

Do not respond or click any links.

File a complaint with the Federal Trade Commission at reportfraud.ftc.gov.

If you’ve shared personal information, monitor your accounts and consider placing a fraud alert with credit bureaus.

Stay vigilant! Always double-check before acting on unsolicited messages. Share this post to help others stay safe.

Source: Adapted from FTC and Nevada DMV guidelines on identifying scams.

02/10/2025

Shocking Stats from the Nevada State Bar

Today, the State Bar of Nevada released its 2024 grievance statistics, and the findings are concerning: 0% of grievances against government lawyers were referred for investigation.

This revelation raises serious questions about fairness, accountability, and the integrity of our legal system. How can we claim to uphold the law when those in government positions appear to be above ethical scrutiny?

It's time for:
- Transparency: We need clear explanations for why no investigations were initiated.
- Reform: The grievance process must be reviewed to ensure it serves justice, not just protects insiders.
- Accountability: All attorneys, regardless of their affiliations, should be held to the same ethical standards.

Let's not let this statistic be just a number. It's a call to action for every attorney, legal professional, and concerned citizen in Nevada. Together, we can push for a system where ethics are not just words in a code but lived values in our practice.

Join the conversation. Demand change.

01/06/2025

I'm excited to share that my latest article, "Navigating Traffic Violations for CDL Drivers: The Impact of the Masking Rule and Supreme Court Decisions," has been published in the current issue of Nevada Lawyer Magazine. This piece delves into the intricate balance between safety regulations and legal rights for commercial drivers, exploring:

- How the FMCSA's "masking rule" affects plea bargaining for CDL holders.
- The implications of good faith negotiations in light of these regulations.
- The recent Supreme Court case, Loper v. Raimondo, and its potential influence on how plea bargains are viewed under federal law.

Understanding these legal nuances is crucial for those whose livelihoods depend on maintaining a clean driving record. Check out the article for a thorough analysis on how these legal frameworks intersect with the practical realities of CDL drivers.

10/24/2024

Wouldn't it be Great

Wouldn't it be great if the corridors of justice not only promised fairness but delivered it with efficiency and transparency? In the heart of Las Vegas, where the stakes are as high as the neon lights, the administration of justice has faced its share of scrutiny. Here's a rundown on some issues we've seen:

Operational Challenges: The recent changes in traffic law turning most violations into civil infractions have led to an unprecedented backlog in the Las Vegas Justice Court. This shift was supposed to keep minor offenders out of jail, but instead, it has created a gridlock, testing the court's capacity to adapt and manage its caseload effectively.

Transparency and Access: There have been hiccups with public access to court records, an essential aspect of judicial transparency. The practice of redacting too much information or making access unnecessarily cumbersome undermines public trust and the principle of open courts.

The End of Specialized Courts: The decision to sunset the Resort Corridor Court, aimed at reducing crime in key tourist areas, has sparked debates. While intended to streamline operations, critics argue it might compromise the specialized attention such unique areas require for maintaining safety and order.

Employee Morale: Whisperings from within the court walls suggest a decline in staff morale, potentially linked to leadership decisions or the lack of clear direction. A court system thrives on the dedication of its staff, and any leadership that overlooks this might see efficiency and effectiveness drop.

Leadership and Decision Making: The leadership style and decisions made at the administrative level affect not just the court's internal workings but its external perception. Decisions like ending effective programs without immediate, equally effective alternatives can appear shortsighted.

Now, envision a scenario where these challenges are met with innovative, transparent, and empathetic leadership. My view leans towards the hope that perhaps new leadership could rejuvenate the Las Vegas Justice Court.

A Note of Celebration, Not Action: This isn't a call for immediate change but rather a celebration in anticipation of pending announcements. Here's to hoping that any upcoming changes or confirmations will herald a new era for the Las Vegas Justice Court, one where justice is not only done but is seen to be done with utmost efficiency and openness. Let's celebrate the potential for positive change on the horizon!

10/01/2024

A Judge's Accountability: The Case of Cynthia Dustin Cruz

Cynthia Dustin Cruz, known to many as Judge Cruz, has been a fixture in the Las Vegas Justice Court since her election to the bench in 2012. However, her recent tenure as Chief Justice of the Peace, a position she held from January 2023 until her recent resignation, has come under scrutiny. Despite stepping down from her leadership role, Cruz remains a judge in Las Vegas Justice Court, Department 5, and is currently running for reelection, a decision that has sparked considerable debate within legal and community circles.

My connection with Judge Cruz dates back to our law school days, where our mutual interest in law led us to externships under different US District Court Judges who shared a library. It was during these formative years that Cruz articulated her ambition to ascend to the judiciary, a goal she ultimately achieved.

However, her time as Chief Justice of the Peace has not been without controversy. Throughout her tenure, numerous procedural inefficiencies and what seemed like systemic issues at the Las Vegas Justice Court came to light. These issues included:

Procedural Delays: Cases experienced unexplained delays, causing undue stress and financial burden on defendants.
Lack of Transparency: There was a perceived lack of openness in court proceedings and decisions, which eroded public trust.
Response to Criticism: Despite public critiques and private communications, including my own, aimed at addressing these concerns, there was a noticeable absence of engagement or policy reform from Judge Cruz.

The silence from Judge Cruz in response to these criticisms was deafening. Emails detailing specific procedural errors, delays, and calls for reform went unanswered. This lack of response not only stifled constructive dialogue but also suggested a concerning detachment from the court's operational realities and the needs of the community it serves.

As we approach the election, the choice facing voters is clear. Madilyn Leavitt Cole, Cruz's opponent, presents an opportunity for change. Cole's campaign promises a return to efficiency, transparency, and responsiveness in the court. Her background and vision seem to align with what the community and legal professionals are yearning for: a justice system that not only serves but is seen to serve fairly and efficiently.

The resignation of Judge Cruz from her role as Chief Justice could be seen as an acknowledgment of the challenges faced or perhaps a strategic move ahead of the election. Regardless, her continued presence on the bench and her bid for reelection demand a thorough examination of her judicial philosophy and administrative capabilities.

In light of these observations, I find myself compelled not just to critique but also to endorse Madilyn Leavitt Cole for the position. Cole's approach promises a judiciary that values accountability, transparency, and community engagement—principles that are not just desirable but essential for the integrity of our legal system.

This election presents a pivotal moment for the Las Vegas Justice Court. It's an opportunity for the community to voice their expectations for a court system that operates with the highest standards of justice, efficiency, and responsiveness. Voting for change with Madilyn Leavitt Cole could be the beginning of that transformation.

09/13/2024

Avoiding the Appearance of Impropriety: A Legal and Political Imperative

In the legal realm, the concept of avoiding the appearance of impropriety is deeply ingrained. This principle dictates that not only must actions be above reproach, but they must also appear to be so. For lawyers and judges, this means steering clear of situations where even the perception of bias or favoritism could arise, regardless of actual wrongdoing.

Why It Matters:

Public Trust: The judiciary's effectiveness hinges on public trust. If citizens perceive that judges or lawyers might be influenced by external factors, the integrity of judicial decisions is questioned, undermining the rule of law.

Ethical Standards: Legal professionals are bound by codes of conduct, like the Model Code of Judicial Conduct, which emphasizes that judges should "avoid impropriety and the appearance of impropriety." This isn't just about following the letter of the law but also its spirit.

Precedent and Practice: Numerous legal precedents and ethical guidelines underscore that the appearance of impropriety can be as damaging as actual misconduct. This principle ensures that justice is not only done but is seen to be done.

Application to Politics:

The concept, while rooted in law, has profound implications for politics:

Political Integrity: Politicians, like judges, must maintain public trust. The appearance of impropriety in politics, such as conflicts of interest or undue influence, can erode voter confidence, leading to cynicism about democratic processes.

Transparency: Political figures should operate with transparency. Even the hint of secretive dealings or favoritism can lead to accusations of corruption, regardless of the actual integrity of their actions.

Ethical Conduct: Just as lawyers and judges have ethical guidelines, politicians should adhere to principles that avoid even the perception of misconduct. This includes clear disclosure of interests, avoiding conflicts, and ensuring that decisions are made in the public's best interest, not personal gain.

Public Perception: In politics, perception often shapes reality. A politician's actions must withstand scrutiny not just from the informed observer but also from the general public, who might not have all the facts but whose trust is crucial.

How It Should Apply:

Disclosure: Politicians should proactively disclose potential conflicts or interests that could be misconstrued.

Recusal: Just as judges recuse themselves, politicians might consider stepping back from decisions where their involvement could be seen as biased.

Ethical Training: Just as lawyers undergo ethical training, political education should include modules on maintaining integrity and avoiding the appearance of impropriety.

Accountability Mechanisms: Stronger oversight bodies or commissions could monitor political conduct, ensuring actions are not only legal but also above board in appearance.

In essence, the principle of avoiding the appearance of impropriety is not just a legal guideline but a societal expectation that should permeate all levels of governance. By upholding this principle, both legal and political figures contribute to a society where trust in institutions is not just maintained but strengthened.

08/15/2024

The State of Civil Traffic Infraction Litigation in Clark County, Nevada
I've just published an in-depth analysis on the unique and often dysfunctional civil traffic infraction system in Clark County, Nevada.

- No District Attorney Involvement: Unlike most states, Nevada treats traffic violations as civil matters, leading to the absence of a dedicated prosecutor.
- Overburdened Courts: Judges are forced to take on prosecutorial roles, potentially compromising fairness and efficiency.
- Ambiguous Laws: Poorly drafted statutes create confusion and injustice, particularly affecting groups like commercial drivers.

Read more about how this system is ripe for reform: (tinyurl.com/yc78jdaw)

01/19/2024

Justice in Limbo: Fight for Fair Trials Against Unelected Judges in Las Vegas! ⚖️
Right here in Las Vegas, a disturbing reality hangs heavy in the air: defendants facing appointed judges with questionable biases, operating behind an invisible wall of impunity. These aren't your typical judges – they're commissioners or pro tems, handpicked and overseen by the Chief Justice of the Peace Cynthia Cruz, with little accountability beyond that single office.

The Shadow of Bias: These unelected judges raise serious concerns about fair trials with actions like:

- Presuming guilt and burdening defendants to prove their innocence. ⚖️
- Rewriting legal terms on the fly, creating confusion and undermining established law.
- Silencing defendants by denying motions without hearings and even misrepresenting proceedings.
- Unaccountable and Unyielding: Unlike elected judges facing the scrutiny of voters, these commissioners hold virtually unassailable positions. The Chief Justice of the Peace Cynthia Cruz, their sole supervisor, holds all the cards, including the power to hire, fire, and seemingly turn a blind eye to potential bias.

This is a recipe for injustice: a system where defendants face potentially biased judges with no real recourse, and a Chief Justice of the Peace Cynthia Cruz with unchecked power. But we, the people of Las Vegas, can change the story.

Our Voice is the Key: We cannot let our justice system be held hostage by unaccountable officials. Here's how you can make a difference:

- Share this post and raise awareness about the lack of accountability and potential bias in the Las Vegas Justice Court. Every share amplifies the call for reform and fair trials.
- Stay informed about specific cases where defendants face questionable treatment. Knowledge is power, and we need to be ready to stand up when needed.
- Contact your local representatives and demand change in the selection and oversight of judges in the Las Vegas Justice Court. Let them know that unelected judges with unchecked power are unacceptable.
- Remember Justice of the Peace Cynthia Cruz at the next election! Make your voice heard by holding the ultimate decision-maker accountable at the ballot box.
Together, we can raise our voices and demand a justice system that truly serves all of Las Vegas, where fair trials are not a gamble but a guarantee.



Remember, your vote, your voice, and your awareness are all powerful tools. Let's use them to ensure fair trials for everyone in Las Vegas!

01/17/2024

Hold Your Horses, Chief Justice of the Peace Cynthia Cruz! Is Nevada's Phone Law Out of Control?
Is simply looking at your phone with the screen OFF illegal in Nevada? A recent decision by Traffic Commissioner David F. Brown, who serves at the pleasure of the Chief Judge, has drivers and lawyers alike scratching their heads and questioning the fairness of our traffic laws. The case is State of Nevada v. Kristina Vadamovna Figurazh, Case No. 23-CI-010814.

Here's the head-scratcher: Commissioner Brown ruled that simply glancing down at a phone, even with a blank screen, can be considered "reading data" under NRS 484B.165, the state's law prohibiting handheld devices while driving.

Whoa, whoa, whoa! Hold on just a second, Chief Judge! This interpretation seems a bit...extreme, doesn't it? Let's dig into why we're not convinced:

- Plain and simple: The law says "reading data," which implies actively accessing and understanding information on a screen. A blank screen doesn't exactly scream "data consumption."
- Lack of evidence: In the case at hand, there was no proof the phone was even in use. Are we criminalizing quick glances at inactive phones now?
-Overreach alert: Expanding the law beyond its intended scope raises serious concerns about due process. Should we all carry legal counsel in our glove compartments, just in case?
-Chilling effect on responsible drivers: This interpretation could discourage folks from even touching their phones for legitimate reasons, like adjusting a hands-free mount or checking a notification. Is that the message we want to send?

We understand distracted driving is a serious issue. But let's focus on the real dangers, not penalizing people for innocent glances at blank screens.

Chief Judge, we urge you to review this decision. Let's ensure Nevada's traffic laws are fair, clear, and focused on genuine distractions, not innocent actions.

What do YOU think? Share your thoughts on this head-scratching decision in the comments!



P.S. Want to learn more about NRS 484B.165? Check out the official Nevada Revised Statutes website: https://www.leg.state.nv.us/nrs/nrs-484b.html

Let's keep the conversation going! Share this post and help spread the word.

Remember, this post is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Always consult with a qualified attorney for specific legal questions.

1.  Except as otherwise provided in this section, a person shall not, while operating a motor vehicle on a highway in this State:

01/16/2024

Kafka's Court: Can You Speed Away from Unjust Traffic Tickets?
Picture this: You're slapped with a speeding ticket – not for a wild joyride, but for a supposed 21-29 MPH over the limit. The kicker? The accusation hangs limp on the word of someone claiming to be a law enforcement officer, shrouded in anonymity. You try to fight it, but the system laughs in your face, dragging you into a Kafkaesque nightmare.

A Hollow Accusation, Hollower Evidence:

The ticket hinges on a whisper – no witness, no dashcam, just an unverified claim by a faceless "officer."
You try to downgrade the infraction, a common right, but it's denied without explanation. Why? The gears of this machine don't explain themselves.
Doubts dance in the shadows: was there even a radar gun? No calibration dates, no certification documents... just more mystery swirling in the air.
Justice, Lost in Translation:

Traffic Commissioner Westmeyer, who serves at the pleasure of the Chief Justice of the Peace, Cynthia Cruz seems to rubber-stamp these unsubstantiated accusations. Is this justice, or a game of thrones, where power trumps facts?
You seek a fair hearing, but the tribunal you face scoffs at due process. No proper notice, no chance to question your invisible accuser, just a blindfolded system stumbling onwards.
Constitutional Rights, Crushed by a Broken System:

Your right to a jury trial? Vanished. Apparently, a speeding ticket doesn't deserve a judge or peers, just a one-sided pronouncement.
The Sixth Amendment, guaranteeing the right to face your accuser? A ghost in the machine. You fight a shadow, left to defend yourself against a faceless whisper.
The verdict? "Guilty," a hollow echo devoid of evidence or explanation. Is this justice, or a broken system churning out convictions based on thin air?
This isn't just about a speeding ticket. It's about a system where shadows trump substance, accusations outshine evidence, and power drowns out rights. And it's happening under the thumb of the Chief Justice of the Peace, raising even more questions about the independence and fairness of this supposed arbiter of justice.

Share this post. Raise your voice. We can't let legal labyrinths swallow justice whole. We must shine a light on these systemic cracks and fight for a fairer legal system, one where the scales of justice tip towards truth, not whispers.