The Tausk Law Firm

The Tausk Law Firm Criminal Defense, Immigration Law (Corporate, Family, Immigration Court), Financial Litigation, International, Tax

Serious ethical breaches which can affect innocent people
05/30/2026

Serious ethical breaches which can affect innocent people

🚨BREAKING: Prominent immigration attorney Alexandra Lozano Kennedy, who handled over 35,000 clients, has resigned from her Washington state law license and been permanently banned from practicing law in the state.

The Washington State Bar Association’s Disciplinary Board determined she repeatedly filed applications for immigration benefits with U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) on behalf of ineligible clients and improperly allowed non-lawyers to perform legal work.

This major case raises serious questions about integrity in the immigration legal industry.

More details expected as the fallout continues.

05/28/2026

Immigration law is an extremely complex area of the law which requires effort and time on the part of attorneys. Although many cases are, of course, similar, each client is unique. A recent (may not recent but I have not looked into this) phenomenon are certain immigration attorneys who open up offices across America and engage in conduct where they accept masses of clients, charge a great deal of money and submit for certain types of relief for which the client is most likely not eligible Even worse, some of these firms engage in behavior where the clients NEVER actually see an attorney and each application is pretty-much a carbon-copy of each other. This creates situations where desperate people pay a great deal of money for relief that is most likely not available and, even worse, puts them on the radar of USCIS which can lead to removal. And, said clients can lose tens of thousands of dollars. Class action lawsuits against this behavior is now starting.

05/22/2026

US Immigration has now reached peak madness. It has been a longstanding policy of the USCIS to allow adjustment of status in the United States for applicants who are on a non-immigrant visa but have a successful Green Card application to be able to receive their Green Card in the United States without having to leave the US and receive their Green Cards in their home country through what is known as consular processing. This memo (below) apparently is changing this practice. If implemented (and this is still up in the air), this will mean absolute chaos in the American Immigration system AND even more chaos for companies who rely on workers who are LAWFULLY PRESENT in the United States not to mention for spouses of U.S. citizens. Said individuals will be forced out of the US to wait for their Green Cards at Embassies and Consulates who do NOT have the personnel to handle this volume of applicants which means, potentially, these workers and spouses will be absent from the United States for years at a time. This will cause economic ripples throughout the US economy as well as devastate families. We are not talking about people who "walked across the border" or people who are non-citizens who committed crimes here. We are talking about essential workers who followed the rules and did everything correctly and loved ones who, once again, followed the rules and are now being told that they will be kicked out of the US for an unknown period of time to go back to their countries of origin to wait for the US State Department, which once again does not have the personnel to handle these situations by any means, to process these Green Cards. The economic and social fabric of the US will be torn apart.
WASHINGTON—U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services today announced a new policy memo reiterating the fact that, consistent with long-standing immigration law and immigration court decisions, aliens seeking adjustment of status must do so through consular processing via the Department of State outside of the country. Officers are directed to consider all relevant factors and information on a case-by-case basis when determining whether an alien warrants this extraordinary form of relief.
“We’re returning to the original intent of the law to ensure aliens navigate our nation’s immigration system properly. From now on, an alien who is in the U.S. temporarily and wants a Green Card must return to their home country to apply, except in extraordinary circumstances. This policy allows our immigration system to function as the law intended instead of incentivizing loopholes. When aliens apply from their home country, it reduces the need to find and remove those who decide to slip into the shadows and remain in the U.S. illegally after being denied residency,” said USCIS Spokesman Zach Kahler.
“Nonimmigrants, like students, temporary workers, or people on tourist visas, come to the U.S. for a short time and for a specific purpose. Our system is designed for them to leave when their visit is over. Their visit should not function as the first step in the Green Card process. Following the law allows the majority of these cases to be handled by the State Department at U.S. consular offices abroad and frees up limited USCIS resources to focus on processing other cases that fall under its purview, including visas for victims of violent crime and human trafficking, naturalization applications, and other priorities. The law was written this way for a reason, and despite the fact that it has been ignored for years, following it will help make our system fairer and more efficient.”
For more information, see the policy memo to USCIS immigration officers.

05/07/2026

Had a sentencing today in Federal court for a client who took a plea. Client was looking at 84 months mandatory and another possible 88 months on two other charges. I was asking for a downward variance of 36 months for a total of 120 which would which is normally very difficult to get. I had a great number of positive factors in my favor but going before a Federal judge is always tricky. I argued that 120 months was more than enough considering everything Wrote a 25 page sentencing memorandum and had great witnesses. Took 3x as long as a normal sentencing and the Judge recused himself to think about it when it was over. Long story short - 120 months! Sometimes the hard work pays off. Happy lawyer, unhappy prosecutor.

04/01/2026

Assault case against client dismissed! Happy lawyer!

People have been asking me about this and I've waited to answer.  Watch the video (you can find it online - about 18 min...
03/27/2026

People have been asking me about this and I've waited to answer. Watch the video (you can find it online - about 18 minutes long. Google "Rob Hopkins Oklahoma Attorney" and you can find it. Below is a truncated version). Long story short - this was not an attorney representing his client in court. This was an attorney grandstanding in the courtroom. Like the old saying goes: play stupid games, win stupid prizes. Like any trial lawyer, I've had confrontations with judges in a courtroom and have been threatened with contempt. But there is a vast difference between aggressively representing your client (which is the duty of every attorney) and thinking a courtroom is a theater. The Judge acted with professionalism and respect throughout these proceedings. Any Federal judge I know would have cut this person off half way into this performance and thrown him in detention immediately.
I had a great trial ad professor who taught me everything I know. He told me two things that have always stuck with me: (1) during a jury trial, the cardinal sin is to waste a jury's time and (2) when you are in a courtroom before a judge, you are a serf and the Judge is the lord of the manor. You can make your arguments and you have a duty to represent your client zealously. But even if the judge is ruling against you 100% of the time and obviously does not like you (happened to me and will happen again and it happens to all attorneys), the courtroom is not a theater and it is certainly not an octagon for MMA. A trial lawyer always, ALWAYS has the responsibility to act in a proper and respectful manner in a courtroom. No one pointed a gun at this person's head and told him to be a trial attorney - he chose this path and has to follow the rules. This was an a textbook example of an attorney acting improperly in a court of law and making it all about the attorney rather than the client.
This is NOT representing your client zealously. This is a theater of the absurd where the attorney made it all about him and did everything possible to p**s off the judge. This is not law. This is an ego running amuck and an attorney playing the victim.
You don't want a person like this representing you. As I said, I've been in situations where I was sweating bullets arguing with judges who I thought was making incorrect and unlawful decisions and knowing that I may be facing the inside of a jail cell very shortly. But it was always in the service of my client and I never made it about myself. You want to be an actor? Study acting. But when it all becomes about you and not your client, you are making a mistake that in the end will hurt your client. Leave your ego at the door or don't go into a courtroom.
I read somewhere that this person is "considering legal action." I don't think he has a case and I would be shocked if the Oklahoma bar sees differently.

Transgender Lawyer Rob Hopkins tried to pull the “Transgender Card” after a heated argument with a judge and ended up on the floor.Check out our Twitter: htt...

Sounds like a reasonable legal defense to me!
02/22/2026

Sounds like a reasonable legal defense to me!

A teacher who was accused of snorting co***ne in the bathroom of her kindergarten classroom allegedly said that she "always cleans up after herself" as a defense.

READ MORE: ⤵️

Address

733 E 12 1/2 Street
Houston, TX
77008

Opening Hours

Monday 9am - 6pm
Tuesday 9am - 6pm
Wednesday 9am - 6pm
Thursday 9am - 6pm
Friday 9am - 6pm

Telephone

+17135504636

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when The Tausk Law Firm posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Contact The Practice

Send a message to The Tausk Law Firm:

Share