Ramey LLP

07/04/2026

Happy 4th of July from all of us at Ramey LLP!

05/28/2026

Credo Semiconductor Strengthens Patent Portfolio with Innovation. Congratulations on US Patent No. 12620994, titled "Fast Calibration of Phase Lock Loops."
https://www.rameyfirm.com/ramey-congratulates-client-credo

05/27/2026

"Penalty for failure implies opportunity to perform… an NPE has no obligation to patent mark"

Clicked below to view article:

05/25/2026

05/19/2026

Patent enforcement is a specialized field that operates by rules most inventors never learn until they have already broken them. By the time a small inventor discovers infringement and decides to act, the most consequential decisions about the case have often already been made, usually by accident........... Link to full article below ⬇️

https://bit.ly/4eUM4Vk

05/19/2026

📣 “The Federal Circuit’s Opinion in mCom IP, LLC v. City Nat’l Bank of Fla. Provides useful guidance on § 285.”

“The Federal Circuit’s Opinion in mCom IP, LLC v. City Nat’l Bank of Fla. Provides useful guidance on § 285.”

04/06/2026

📍New Blog Post: The United States patent system is at an inflection point. For over a decade, patent eligibility doctrine under 35 U.S.C. §101 has drifted into uncertainty, producing inconsistent judicial outcomes and eroding the reliability of patent rights in critical areas of innovation. The Patent Eligibility Restoration Act (PERA) offers a clear legislative solution. But its passage is far from guaranteed.....

The United States patent system is at an inflection point. For over a decade, patent eligibility doctrine under 35 U.S.C. §101 has drifted into uncertainty, producing inconsistent judicial outcomes and eroding the reliability of patent rights in critical areas of innovation. The Patent Eligibilit.....

03/23/2026

📢 New Blog Post: “Ortiz v. Vizio does not alter Wine Railway’s core holding that a non-practicing entity does not need to patent mark.”

“Ortiz v. Vizio does not alter Wine Railway’s core holding that a non-practicing entity does not need to patent mark.”

03/16/2026

📣New Blog Post: “The proposed amendments to disclosures would severely burden patent plaintiffs and provide a playbook for deep pocket Big Tech in patent infringement litigation.”

“The proposed amendments to disclosures would severely burden patent plaintiffs and provide a playbook for deep pocket Big Tech in patent infringement litigation.”

03/05/2026

New Blog Post: The existence of a patent settlement license cannot mean there is a patent marking requirement without more. It is the intention of the parties to the settlement license as expressed through the terms of the settlement license that control. But Ortiz v. Vizio also underscores that an NPE must affirmatively explain how it has complied with § 287—or why § 287 does not apply....

The existence of a patent settlement license cannot mean there is a patent marking requirement without more. It is the intention of the parties to the settlement license as expressed through the terms of the settlement license that control. But Ortiz v. Vizio also underscores that an NPE must aff...