Zakaria Law Firm

Zakaria Law Firm Law Firm in Houston, Texas. Immigration, Business, Family, Corporate, Personal Injury, Civil Litigation, & Real Estate Law.

Zakaria Law Firm, based in the heart of Houston, specializes in offering comprehensive legal solutions with a particular emphasis on Personal Injury Law, Real Estate Law, and Family law, including divorce cases. Our team of seasoned attorneys brings a wealth of experience across various legal domains such as business law, real estate, estate planning, civil litigation, tax law, and immigration. We

are dedicated to ensuring each client receives personalized attention, guiding them through their legal journey with expertise and compassion. At the forefront of our services is our commitment to assisting families through the complexities of divorce. We understand the emotional and financial intricacies involved and strive to deliver resolutions that are fair, equitable, and tailored to each client's unique needs. Our expertise covers a broad spectrum, from negotiating divorce settlements and handling child custody and support issues to dealing with the division of assets and alimony. Our approach is not just about legal proceedings; it's about understanding our clients' emotional and practical challenges. We ensure that our clients are well-informed, supported, and confidently represented in negotiations or the courtroom. We also offer guidance in estate planning, helping clients secure their legacy and peace of mind for the future. At Zakaria Law Firm, we are more than just your attorneys; we are your partners in navigating life's legal challenges, committed to achieving the best possible outcomes for you and your family.

08/04/2026

Forbes reports that the Trump Administration is considering a $100,000 fee for Optional Practical Training (OPT), which could effectively limit international students’ ability to obtain post-graduation work authorization in the United States. Immigration attorneys and industry stakeholders have questioned the proposal’s legal authority and warned that restricting OPT and STEM OPT could negatively impact U.S. employers, universities, and innovation.

08/04/2026

Today, DOS published a final rule in the Federal Register making permanent the visa bond program established by the August 11, 2025, temporary final rule. Under the program, certain B-1/B-2 visa applicants from designated countries may be required to post a bond of up to $20,000 as a condition of visa issuance, as determined by consular officers. The final rule takes effect immediately.

07/30/2026

Immigrants are not entitled to receive majority of public benefits. Applicants seeking green cards have to demonstrate that they will not become a 'public charge.” An immigration official can deem an applicant inadmissible — denying them a green card, visa, or admission into the United States — if the applicant is deemed a “public charge.”

How is "Public Charge" defined?

The definition of who may be considered a public charge often changes under presidential administrations, as the federal government never issued a regulation defining the term, relying on internal guidance and a century of legalprecedent instead. Trump Administration has issued new guidelines. However, it is important to stress that the new regulation is not the same as the rule the first Trump administration issued in 2019. Unlike that rule, the new rule does not actually spell out how “public charge” should be defined going forward. Instead, it erases any definition of the term from federal regulations and leaves interpretation to the discretion of USCIS. The agency says it will issue further guidance to officers going forward — though it’s unclear whether they will release all the details of their guidance to the public. However, even that guidance is likely to leave a lot of wiggle room for individual officials to decide who counts as a likely public charge.

07/30/2026

Today, USCIS announced an upcoming interim final rule (IFR) that will allow asylum officers to refer asylum applicants to immigration court without first conducting an interview.

07/30/2026

Over the past few days, there have been several reports of an increase in immigrants being detained by the Department of Homeland Security at U.S. airports during domestic travel. This is occurring across the country, including in California, Colorado, Florida, Illinois, Kansas, Michigan, New Jersey, Texas, and Virginia. Impacted immigrants include those whose lawful status has expired but who may have timely filed green card or other benefit applications that allow them to be in a period of authorized stay. Reports include individuals being detained who do not have criminal records and who have valid work authorization or advance parole documents.

If you do not have a valid non-immigrant status with an I-94, you should speak to your immigration attorney about the risks related to domestic travel.

07/27/2026

New Rules for Asylum and Work Permit:

1. "Certain" Affirmative Cases: The text intentionally targets "certain" affirmative asylum applications. While USCIS has not limited the rule to a single demographic, the administration has framed it as a tool to rapidly offload cases deemed to have been filed "for purposes of delay and work authorization" rather than legitimate fear.

2. Future Applicants: The 132,000 annual estimate focuses heavily on new and future filings to stop the backlog from expanding.

4. Legal Criteria for Direct Referrals: The rule allows asylum officers to bypass interviews and refer cases to Department of Justice (DOJ) immigration court based strictly on a written review of the application and background checks. Officers are instructed to flag cases that meet the following criteria:

5. "Non-Meritorious" Applications: Applications that, on their face, fail to present a legally sound claim of persecution based on protected grounds (race, religion, nationality, social group, or political opinion).

6. Statutorily Barred Applications: Cases where the written record immediately reveals the applicant is legally ineligible for asylum (e.g., filing past the standard one-year deadline without an exception, or possessing certain criminal histories).

7. Indications of Fraud or Delay: Applications flagged by fraud-detection software or database checks as containing false information, or those explicitly deemed to be filed primarily to trigger a work permit rather than out of legitimate fear.

8. Intersection with Work Permit Restrictions: This direct-referral rule operates in tandem with a sweeping Department of Homeland Security (DHS) push to restrict Employment Authorization Documents (EADs) for asylum seekers.

9. The 180-Day Rule Lockout: Under a separate, recently proposed DHS rule, eligibility for a work permit is tied strictly to a statutory 180-day asylum application processing time. Because USCIS currently faces severe resource constraints, meeting this window is mathematically impossible for most applicants.

10. Stopping New EADs: The administration's stated goal is to halt the acceptance of new work permit applications until the affirmative asylum backlog is drastically reduced.

11. The Govt has also introduced massive, restrictive changes to the Employment Authorization Document (EAD) rules for asylum seekers. These updates focus heavily on tightening timelines, raising costs, and blocking entry to the legal workforce.

12. Drastic Timeline Restrictions

Extended Clock: The minimum time an applicant must wait to apply for an initial EAD stretches from 150 days to 365 days after filing for asylum.

Systemic Trigger Pauses: USCIS must completely halt the acceptance of new EAD applications whenever the average affirmative asylum case processing backlog exceeds 180 days.

Shorter Validity Windows: Newly issued asylum work permits have their expiration terms slashed down to just 18 months, down from the previous 5-year standard.

No Auto-Extensions: The agency has terminated new automatic 540-day work permit renewal extensions for individuals submitting late-stage applications.

13. Financial and Administrative Barriers

New Application Fees: Seeking an initial asylum-based EAD now incurs a $560 filing fee. Previously, first-time applicant filings were free of charge.

Costly Renewals: Renewal fees have surged, setting digital applicants back $745 and mail-in submissions back $795.

Decoupled Social Security Numbers: Applicants can no longer request a Social Security Number (SSN) directly inside their EAD form; they must navigate a completely separate, in-person application at an SSA office later.

14. Broad Outright Bans

Late-Filing Block: Any applicant who submits their underlying asylum claim more than one year after entering the U.S. is barred from receiving a work permit unless an explicit judge exception applies.

Border Crosser Restrictions: The policy blocks work authorization for individuals who crossed the U.S. border between designated ports of entry without formal inspections.

07/18/2026

Some Good News:

On July 15, 2026, the U.S. District Court in Rhode Island in Dorcas Int'l Institute of Rhode Island, et al v. USCIS issued an order that denies the US Government’s request to stay the June 5, 2026 decision vacating USCIS hold policies pending appeal to the First Circuit Court of Appeals. The Order requires USCIS to process and adjudicate applications. The Court found that USCIS failed to show that it was likely to succeed on the merits, that it would be irreparably injured absent a stay, and that the interest of the public and Plaintiff’s heavily weighed against the grant of the stay. Therefore, USCIS is now required to continue processing cases that were previously subject to the hold under Trump Administration. It is likely that Government will appeal this Order and it is possible that First Circuit Court of Appeals may stay the processing of the applications. However, for now, the USCIS is required to process these applications.

07/18/2026

If this proposal is adopted, immigrating to the United States could become financially out of reach for anyone who isn't wealthy.
According to the Wall Street Journal, the Trump Administration is considering a rule that would require certain immigrant visa applicants at U.S. consulates abroad to post bonds of up to $100,000. The stated goal is to ensure that prospective immigrants can financially support themselves. Under the proposal—which is still under discussion—applicants would post the bond and could potentially get it back after becoming U.S. citizens.

It's worth noting that current law already requires immigrants to have a financial sponsor, and immigrants are barred from receiving most public benefits during their first three years in the country. This undercuts the claim that immigrants drain government resources. In fact, immigrants contribute more to the economy than they take out. Economists generally agree that immigrants provide a net fiscal benefit, drive economic growth, and are essential for sustaining programs like Social Security.

07/09/2026

Clients often ask if they are legally in the United States if they have a pending green card or other immigration benefit application pending.

While a pending application does not necessarily grant valid status – until it is approved- a pending application may allow the applicant to stay in the US during the pendency of the application. Even most government agencies do not understand the difference between lawful status and being lawfully allowed to stay in the US.
Lawful status means that US govt has expressly granted an immigration status to you based on a classification under the Immigration & Nationality Act (“INA”).

For example, individuals with H-1, F-1, B-1/B-2, or green card are in lawful status. On the other hand, lawfully being in the US means that either you have a lawful status under the INA or you have a pending application for immigration status that allows you to stay in the US during the pendency of the application. For example, individuals who have filed -but not yet approved- an application for asylum, change of status from one non-immigrant status to another status, or green card.

Therefore, a person may be lawfully present in the US without being in a lawful status. For example, an applicant for adjustment of status or asylum may remain in the United States while that application is pending, even though such applicant may not possess a traditional nonimmigrant or immigrant status recognized elsewhere in the INA.

It is important to understand these concepts because even when an applicant may lawfully be in the United States, there have been a few reports of Immigration & Customs Enforcement arresting and detaining these individuals. Examples include individuals who are married to US citizens and have filed their green card applications. These applicants are now processing their applications through immigration courts as part of their deportation process.

Overall, we have not seen a trend of ICE arresting all applicants with pending applications so these arrests are not the norm. You should always consult an attorney to determine your status and legal options available to you.

Address

6161 Savoy, Suite 1000
Houston, TX
77036

Opening Hours

Monday 9am - 5pm
Tuesday 9am - 5pm
Wednesday 9am - 5pm
Thursday 9am - 5pm
Friday 9am - 5pm

Telephone

+17137897500

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when Zakaria Law Firm posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Contact The Practice

Send a message to Zakaria Law Firm:

Shortcuts

Share