10/22/2023
Below a post from eight years ago regarding two cases resolved for two clients.
As I mentioned in the post, ma*****na is now legal. Running my office, I work the same way on every case I handle, responsible fully to every client that trusts me to handle their legal and life problem. Jun Factoran, my father in law, no longer with us, was a fantastic lawyer, much of his practice focused on human rights, commented eight years ago, “Reminds me of why we entered the legal profession in the first place. Ours is a noble profession, Jay. Keep your ideals alive. Good job.”
I’d prefer prior to legalizing ma*****na a device was developed to determine the level of THC in the blood, and legislation passed reflecting a level NJ determines is impairment for driving based on science and studies, similar to alcohol devices, as THC metabolites remain in the blood for weeks, revealed in urine, and are improperly used to try to prove drivers are impaired. The State now have Drug Recognition Experts, but that analysis is often suspect with ma*****na usage. Just as alcohol impacts people differently, so does ma*****na, and the science to produce a valid scientific test for THC levels in blood and an agreement on what level society deems impaired is much more difficult to accomplish than alcohol tests.
October 22, 2015
Yesterday two courts, two clients, both African American men, one 53 the other 23, and both facing criminal charges with possible jail and definite loss of their careers. In one I wrote a long memo to pre trial intervention in a case where it usually isn't allowed; he had a prior conviction with a prison term 30 years ago. Got out and has worked in his field for 26 years. The facts deeply explored showed diversion from punitive justice was the fair and correct resolution, over putting him back in jail for three years, and we got it and my client gets to move on with probation monitoring his progress. He originally came into my office and I looked at his history, the current offense, the facts surrounding that offense and his family and lifestyle. I told him if I was going to defend him properly I would have to get to know him as well as anyone has in his entire life. Doing that I was able to explain to the Prosecutor where this man had been, how he lived his life, how the event transpired and how sending another man to jail was not the proper solution. The Prosecutor and Judge eventually agreed. Today he is at work.
Evening Court my young client who works with severely developmentally impaired men, taking them to medical appointments and activities, was busted off the job with a small amount of ma*****na. Not wanting to go through the process of getting a warrant, police questioned him for almost an hour, telling him among other things that they were working all night, implying they would just hold him until he consented to a search. I wrote a long memo on right to counsel, custody and interrogation, and search and seizure law under both the federal law and N.J law, and how new law in New Jersey will impact these situations moving forward. In Court, scheduled for trial, I met with the Prosecutor and the police, who had all read the memo, and we all agreed as to where the concerns were - understanding my client was cooperative while police on the road have to make on site decisions dealing with complicated situations. They agreed the Case could be resolved in a fair, less punitive manner. The criminal charge with devastating career consequences was dropped and everyone learned. The Judge accepted the resolution and said after "I read your legal memorandum. It was very good."
Likely the prosecutor had a clue the Judge felt my analysis was persuasive! These cases took a lot of time and a lot of work, with very reasonable legal fees.
Two less men in jail today.