09/16/2026
A good win for an injured person today.
A large corporation asked the court to enter a broad protective order that would have restricted how information produced in discovery could be used and disclosed.
We opposed the motion.
Our position was straightforward: if a corporation wants to keep information from public view, it has the burden to show a legitimate basis for doing so. Simply pointing to the possibility of other lawsuits isn’t enough. After a lot of research and great brief.
The court agreed and denied the motion.
In premises liability cases, discovery matters. Transparency matters. And injured people deserve the opportunity to find out what a property owner knew, what it did, and whether an injury could have been prevented.
A good result for our client—and now we move forward with the case.
