Gary Ostrow P.A.

Gary Ostrow P.A. Fort Lauderdale Criminal Lawyer Gary Ostrow Defending Your Freedom for Over 30 Years. Death Penalty Case Certified. Member Southern Dt Fl and 11th circuit Gary S.

The Law Offices of Gary Ostrow, based in Fort Lauderdale, has been successfully representing clients charged for criminal offenses for over 30 years. Ostrow P.A. has earned a wide reputation for his aggressive trial advocacy and passion for defending clients. His firm vigorously defends clients facing misdemeanor and felony criminal charges and his areas of practice include:

• Criminal Defense

DUI Defense
• Ticket Defense
• Violent Crime Defense
• Murder Defense
• White Collar Crimes
• Domestic Violence
• S*x Crimes
• Search and Seizure
• Drug Trafficking

Ostrow is a Two Time Winner of the Broward Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers "Hat Trick" Award, for Six Consecutive Felony Acquittals.
1. Aggravated Assault on a Law Enforcement Officer.
2. Battery on Law Enforcement Officer.
3. Trafficking Co***ne.
4. Escape.
5. Possession of Co***ne.
6. Possession of Co***ne. Bar Admissions:
Florida, 1982
U.S. District Court Southern District of Florida, 1982
Education:
Nova University Center for the Study of Law, Fort Lauderdale, Florida, 1982
Juris Doctorate
Honors:
Finalist in the Nova Law Center Moot Court Competition
University of South Florida, 1978
B.A. Classes/Seminars Taught:
Lecturer - Police Academy: The Art of Cross Examination
Honors and Awards:
Presiding Judge for both national and local Law Student Moot Court Competitions
Winner of the Broward Association Criminal Defense Lawyers "Hat Trick" award, for
Six Consecutive Felony Acquittals

01/07/2023
The Firms latest Federal Sentencing Disposition
09/29/2022

The Firms latest Federal Sentencing Disposition

01/22/2021

State v. Jose Melendez First Degree Murder

Death by Drug Delivery

On March 8, 2001, I was consumed with my morning ritual of digesting the metro section of the Sun -Sentinel, when I was taken by the headline of a first degree murder by virtue of an alleged drug delivery to an underage female victim.

Based upon the headline, Jose Melendez was alleged to have delivered $10.00 worth of he**in to 13-year old Sherry Maresco, who was alleged to have fatally overdosed as a result. Consequently, Melendez was arrested and charged with her first degree capital murder.

Florida Statutes 782.04(3) essentially provides when a person of 18 years of age or older unlawfully distributes a qualifying controlled substance , and said delivery is proven to be the proximate cause of death of the victim, than it can be charged as a capital offense commonly (or not so commonly) known as Death by Drug Distribution.

Something about this story didn't sit right, independant of the horror of the untimely death of a 13 -year old, so I decided to pay Mr. Melendez, who was unrepresented, a visit in the Broward County jail where he was held without bond. I advised Melendez that I was disturbed by the reported facts and offered to consider representing him pro bono, if he was sympathetic, honest in answering my questions and didn't bu****it me for starters. I paid Melendez three visits to the jail before I decided to file my pro bono appearance as attorney of record on his behalf.


Melendez was a soft spoken immigrant from El Salvador with no prior criminal record who peddled small amounts of narcotics while on his bicycle from the Silver Oaks mobile home trailer park in Davie The guy couldn't rub two nickers together and by all appearances was just a petty nickel and dime drug dealer.

Melendez also advised me that the delivery was made to Christina, a friend of the victim, and not Maresco although they might have been togrther at the time of the delivery. This point begs the question, who then was responsible for the delivery to Maresco? And why wasn't Christina charged with delivery, a second degree felonyor with Maresco's first degree murder?

By all appearances, it was becoming more apparent that my initial instincts were spot on and that Melendez was apparently the fall guy for the Miramar police department along with the Broward County State Attorney's office.


The question about the delivery was a legitimate legal question that law enforcement nor the state could answer during the two years I litigated this pro bono case before the Honorable Ilona Holmes, a former federal prosecutor, who was a pleasure to appear in before during my decades as a criminal defense lawyer.

We learned during the Discovery phase of the defense that the victim had been using at least co***ne with friends and had vomited, with no one coming to her aid the night prior to her death and that based upon the autopsy and conclusion of the medical examiner, that the cause of death was from co***ne toxicity, which caused extensive bleeding in her lungs, and that he**in and xanax toxicity were "contributing factors."

There was evidence abduced during the defense of Melendez that Mareso's boyfriend had been a long term source of co***ne for Sherry however he was never charged nor questioned by Miramar detectives.
Based upon the report of the medical examiner, the actual delivery being made to Christina, Maresco's girlfriend and a series of other arguments on Melendez's behalf, the state attorney's office ultimately dropped the charges against Melendez.

On the final day of the hearing when the state announced a "nolle prosque" dropping any and all charges against him approximately two years after his arrest, Melendez was overjoyed, left the courthouse with his mother, and hasn't been seen or heard from since.

Should Melendez have been charged? with what? Who else should have been charged? Why wasn't Christina charged? Should her boyfriend have been charged? Was the result a fair and just outcome? What else?

http://www.17th.flcourts.org/coronavirus-covid-19-updates/  I'm not going to get political and this is NOT a commentary ...
05/20/2020

http://www.17th.flcourts.org/coronavirus-covid-19-updates/

I'm not going to get political and this is NOT a commentary on the current epidemic but:

I for one cannot imagine trying a criminal case before a jury on ZOOM. Understanding Broward's 17th Judicial Circuit Chief Judge Tutor's order on the stay and/ or a Zoom proceeding, this policy essentially DENIES the accused the absolute 6th amendment right to confront the witnesses against any criminal defendant.

Those of us who try cases KNOW there is no real confrontation via satellite, so to speak and I imagine this policy, whether warranted or not, is going to raise a significant number of Constitution issues, appeals, writs and mandates.

The balance between the public welfare and a defendant's Constituional rights is a delicate one to say the least, but regardless of anyone's politics, this Order is a clear deprivation of the rights afforded the accused and I for one cannot proceed accordingly.

Showing no disrespect to the court whatsoever, my moral, legal and ethical obligations remain wholly to my client and none of us are doing anything but a disservice to our respective client's by submitting to this mandate.

Anyone who does, I would argue, is breaching their Constitutional oath as an advocate for the accused and there is no greater purpose or cause for the trial lawyer than to ensure the accused the most effective representation possible.

Short of any speedy trial issues, I have the hope and expectation, that the courts will recognize this dilemma and see to it that the rights of the accused remain uncompromised at any cost.

Coronavirus (COVID-19) Updates Coronavirus (COVID-19) Updates Please visit this webpage frequently for updates regarding the current status of the Courts and the Coronavirus. Emergency Hotline Number: (954) 831-7777 Link to Judicial Directory Seventeenth Judicial Updates Supreme Court, Governor and....

I'm not going to get political and this is NOT a commentary on the current epidemic but: I for one cannot imagine trying...
05/20/2020

I'm not going to get political and this is NOT a commentary on the current epidemic but:

I for one cannot imagine trying a criminal case before a jury on ZOOM. Understanding Judge Tutor's order on the stay and/ or a Zoom proceeding, this policy essentially DENIES the accused the absolute 6th amendment right to confront the witnesses against any criminal defendant.

Those of us who try cases KNOW there is no real confrontation via satellite, so to speak and I imagine this policy, whether warranted or not, is going to raise a significant number of Constitution issues, appeals, writs and mandates.

The balance between the public welfare and a defendant's Constituional rights is a delicate one to say the least, but regardless of anyone's politics, this Order is a clear deprivation of the rights afforded the accused and I for one cannot proceed accordingly.

Showing no disrespect to the court whatsoever, my moral, legal and ethical obligations remain wholly to my client and none of us are doing anything but a disservice to our respective client's by submitting to this mandate.

Anyone who does, I would argue, is breaching their Constitutional oath as an advocate for the accused and there is no greater purpose or cause for the trial lawyer than to ensure the accused the most effective representation possible.

Short of any speedy trial issues, I have the hope and expectation, that the courts will recognize this dilemma and see to it that the rights of the accused remain uncompromised at any cost.

Coronavirus (COVID-19) Updates Coronavirus (COVID-19) Updates Please visit this webpage frequently for updates regarding the current status of the Courts and the Coronavirus. Emergency Hotline Number: (954) 831-7777 Link to Judicial Directory Seventeenth Judicial Updates Supreme Court, Governor and....

12/26/2018

DONT MESS WITH THE BREATH TEST QUEST

09/25/2018

Attention Former and current Criminal Clients

The Firm is Happy to announce that effective immediately if not sooner :

We are accepting ALL family Law matters including but not limited to: Petitions for Dissolution, Child Support and Custody Issues, Contempt, Termination and/ or reinstatement of parental rights and Marchman Act Petitions should there be a need to seek Involuntary Civil Commitment of family members due to Drug Abuse and Addiction Issues .

Consultations are at no cost.

05/31/2017

DUI of the Tiger! The Defoe Show, Sports Talk Radio will have me on tomorrow morning at 9:05 am. Discussing the DUI arrest of Tiger Woods. So if you are bored out of your mind and want to hear the legal details in the most effective way, listen in!! I Heart radio. Or Not!

03/09/2017

Please Tune in to Recorded Radio Show Co Hosted by Gary Ostrow P. A. Every Monday Wednesday and Friday at 3:30. Today's Guest Among others is Criminal Circuit Court Judge Jeff Levinson

CASE CURRENTLY HANDLED BY GARY OSTROW P. A.https://www.google.com/amp/www.chicagotribune.com/sports/chicagoinc/ct-brian-...
02/08/2017

CASE CURRENTLY HANDLED BY GARY OSTROW P. A.https://www.google.com/amp/www.chicagotribune.com/sports/chicagoinc/ct-brian-urlacher-hair-lawsuit-chicago-inc-spt-0208-20170207-story,amp.html

Retired Bears linebacker Brian Urlacher is seeking at least $200,000 in damages from a Florida hair restoration company he alleges has used his name and image without his permission. But the transplant surgeon's attorney refuted the claims made in the lawsuit, which was filed Monday in Cook County C...

Address

2500 North Federal Highway
Fort Lauderdale, FL
33305

Opening Hours

Monday 9am - 5pm
Tuesday 9am - 5pm
Wednesday 9am - 5pm
Thursday 9am - 5pm
Friday 9am - 5pm

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when Gary Ostrow P.A. posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Contact The Practice

Send a message to Gary Ostrow P.A.:

Share