Suzanne E Williams, P.A.

Suzanne E Williams, P.A. Divorce and family law firm serving South Florida for 29 years. Specializing in marital & family law from the smallest to the most complex cases.

If you are dealing with divorce, relocation, modification, support/enforcement, child issues, we are here.

05/29/2026

LLC's and Marital Homes.
When an LLC and its real estate serve as a marital home, the non-marital distinction often blurs. Division requires untangling how the home was financed, while occupancy prior to the divorce is typically decided by a judge based on the financial needs of the parties and minor children.How the Asset is DividedBecause the property was used as a marital home and paid for by the LLC, courts will apply specific legal principles to determine if the asset has converted into a shared (marital) asset.Commingling and Transmutation: If marital funds (like income earned by either spouse during the marriage) were used to pay the LLC's mortgages, taxes, or upkeep, the court may rule that the LLC or property has undergone transmutation—meaning it transforms into a marital asset subject to equitable distribution.The "Gift" Presumption: If the LLC bought the home specifically for the couple to use as a primary residence, the court may view the property as a marital gift, overcoming its original non-marital status.Reimbursement Claims: If the LLC is proven to be strictly non-marital, the non-owning spouse may still be entitled to a reimbursement. The court might require the LLC to repay the marital estate for the funds used to pay for the house.Division Methods: Instead of selling the LLC or the home, a judge will typically award the business and the home to one spouse (often the primary operator of the business) and offset this by awarding the other spouse an equal value in other marital assets, such as retirement accounts, investments, or cash.Who Gets to Live in It Before the Divorce is FinalDuring the divorce proceedings, the court will issue temporary orders dictating who gets exclusive use and possession of the property.Exclusive Use and Occupancy: A judge will grant one spouse the exclusive right to live in the home until the divorce is finalized. This is generally awarded to the spouse who is the primary caregiver for minor children, to maintain stability.Financial Status Quo: The court will issue temporary support (alimony or child support) which factors in who is paying the expenses for the home. The spouse occupying the home is usually responsible for the day-to-day bills, though the court may order the non-resident spouse to cover the mortgage if there is a significant income disparity.Sale of the Home: If neither spouse can afford the home on their own, or if there are no minor children, the court may order the home to be sold while the divorce is pending and place the proceeds in a separate escrow account until a final division is reached.
Disclaimer: Divorce and corporate property laws vary heavily by jurisdiction. For an exact determination of your rights and local rules, consult with us at [email protected].

05/29/2026

SHCOOL DESIGNATION ARTICLE:

One of the biggest conflicts in divorce and paternity cases involving minor children is school designation authority, known as school boundary determination in Florida. Specifically, the court must decide which parent will have school designation in their Florida parenting plan. This one singular issue often prevents the parties from coming to a full agreement on a parenting plan, even when all other issues have been agreed on. In order to find out why school designation Florida parenting plan is so vital to family law litigants, we must first understand what it is by definition, and why it is so important. School issues after divorce are serious for both parents and children.

Generally, the custodial parent, meaning the primary timesharing parent, is granted school designation authority in Florida. This often seems logical and rational. Generally speaking, if Mom or Dad lives close to the children’s school and has more time with the kids, and has a track record of establishing a routine and helps the children become responsible kids, the court may award them school boundary determination. The kids will not have to travel far to attend school, and they can remain in the same school district/zone that they attended before their parents started divorcing. This can prevent additional stress and anxiety for the kids. Routines are important. However, in some cases, Mom or Dad has moved because of the break up or divorce and the area where they live has a much better school system with better school ratings and reading and math proficiency levels. Perhaps Mom or Dad’s new school zone is a more appropriate place for the kids to attend.

Access to Better Schools for the Minor Children
The availability of good schools, the distance the parents live from those schools, and the safety and stability of the kids are three factors the court uses to determine school designation in Florida parenting plans. The question is, during settlement negotiations, or during mediation, will the parties themselves consider their children’s best interests in deciding which party has school designation authority. If not, school issues after divorce will likely persist.

Relocation with Minor Children and School Designation Authority
Perhaps adding an extra layer of conflict is parents often relocate with minor children. Jobs and careers change often, and new opportunities are often available in other areas. This may mean that the parent with school designation Florida parenting plan may be allowed to transfer the kids to a new school. This may cause the other side to contest relocation, or to petition the court for school designation authority to be transferred to them, the other parent.

Call Suzanne E. Williams, P.A., Family Law Firm, for guidance with your parenting/timesharing plan. 954-765-1200 today.

05/20/2026

The Florida Community Property Trust Act
October 12, 2023

Florida statute became effective on July 1, 2022, known as the Florida Community Property Trust Act (FCPTA), and is contained at Florida Statutes Section 736.1501, et. seq. This newly enacted law has not been tested against scrutiny by the Internal Revenue Service, but the express intent of the statute is to allow trusts created pursuant to the Statute to provide “community property” status on the assets held in trust created pursuant to the Statute (FCP Trust).

Florida is not a community property state; it is a common law state, where the title to the property will be presumed to determine ownership. For example, if a vehicle is titled in the husband’s name, that vehicle is presumed to be owned by the husband. Unlike Florida, community property states have a property system which governs ownership of assets between a married couple.1 In a community property state, all property acquired during the marriage (other than gifts or inheritances) are deemed to be owned by both spouses, each owning one-half, regardless of how the property is titled. In the above example, if the vehicle is titled to the husband (and was not a gift or inheritance), then the vehicle is presumed to be owned one-half by the husband and one-half by the wife.

The FCPTA is important to us because this recently enacted law may provide married couples with an additional tax savings strategy. By incorporating a FCP Trust created pursuant to the statute, it will confer community property status on all of the assets within the FCP Trust, and all income and appreciation on the assets.2 Now, you are probably still wondering how this provides tax savings. The tax savings is the consequence of having all of the property within the FCP Trust receive a full step-up in basis3 on the assets titled and held in such a trust upon the first to die; essentially wiping the slate clean as to any imbedded gains in highly appreciated assets. The FCPTA is based upon the legal authority found in section 1014(b)(6) of the Internal Revenue Code which provides that community property held by the deceased spouse and the surviving spouse under community property laws of any state are afforded a step-up in basis. Although this Florida Statute has not been “tested” as passing Internal Revenue scrutiny, it was drafted with such an intent and the express language to create the intended consequence of community property status and the benefit of the full step-up in basis.

An additional benefit of the FCPTA is that if you have previously resided in a community property jurisdiction (such as California, Nevada, Texas, Washington, Wisconsin, Idaho, New Mexico, Arizona and Louisianna) the FCPTA will allow you to easily continue to hold your assets as community property without having to later take any affirmative action to establish the community property status upon the death of the first spouse.
Whether or not you may benefit from a FCP Trust needs to be evaluated on an individual basis, taking into account asset structure, length of marriage, potential creditor issues and the like. Also, you need to be aware there are some mandatory provisions for a trust to comply with the FCPTA:

the trust must expressly declare whether some or all of the assets are to be classified as community property;
there must be at least one qualified trustee (defined as a Florida resident, or a company authorized to act as trustee in Florida);
the trust must be created and signed by both spouses; and
the trust must contain specific disclaimer language as to the risks and consequences of entering into such a trust in the event of divorce or creditor claims.
The above is a synopsis to simply let you know this new tool is available in Florida to both Florida residents and non-Florida residents alike.

05/12/2026

Greyson’s Law in Florida: What You Need to Know
In 2021, the state of Florida enacted a pivotal new law aimed at better protecting children caught in the middle of contentious family law cases involving domestic violence. Known as “Greyson’s Law,” this legislation specifically targets custody and visitation determinations in situations where one parent has perpetrated abuse against the other parent or the child.
The law is named for Greyson Kessler, a 4-year-old tragic victim of a murder-suicide during a court-ordered visitation with his father. Greyson’s story brought attention to the need for family courts to give greater consideration to the dynamics of domestic violence when deciding parenting plans. The goal is to prevent scenarios where an abusive parent still receives unsupervised access to the child.
This article will explore the heartbreaking story that inspired Greyson’s Law and the journey to enshrine enhanced protections into Florida legislation. We’ll cover the law’s key child protection provisions and the expected impact on Florida domestic violence law.
The Tragic Inspiration Behind Greyson’s Law
Greyson's Law
The Story of Greyson Kessler
The heartbreaking story of 4-year-old Greyson Kessler is the genesis of the child protection legislation that now bears his name. Greyson’s parents, John Stacey and Allison Kessler, had separated years earlier and shared custody of their young son. However, Mr. Stacey had sent threatening messages to Ms. Kessler leading up to the incident. Ms. Kessler filed an emergency petition with Broward Family Court just days before Greyson’s death, outlining her imminent fears for the safety of her child. but Florida law previously had no formal mechanism for allowing threats towards a parent to “create a nexus with a child.”
Before the incident, Ms. Kessler filed contempt motions as well as requests to change the time-sharing arrangement with Stacey, and also asked for a psychological evaluation of him.
The court did not find that there was a threat to Greyson, however, and the previous state of the law enabled an incident in May 2021 with fatal consequences. Following a bitter argument over the phone, Mr. Stacey arrived at Ms. Kessler’s home demanding to take Greyson. When she refused, he assaulted her and forcibly abducted their son. Tragically, young Greyson would lose his life just hours later.
The Legislative Response
The preventable tragedy ignited public outcry and advocacy from child safety groups. It set in motion a push for legislation to prevent such failures in family court judgment from ever enabling this kind of violence again. The bill was introduced to the Florida legislature in 2021 and was signed into law May 2023, taking effect in July 2023.
Greyson’s memory lives on through the prominent law now protecting other children. It serves as a solemn reminder for the court to exercise greater discretion around custody and visitation when one parent has a history of domestic abuse. No child should meet the same fate as Greyson due to a lack of appropriate safeguards in the legal system designed to protect families.
Key Provisions of Greyson’s Law
Greyson's Law in Florida
Greyson’s Law strengthens child protection through concrete changes to Florida statutes governing custody and visitation determinations in family court.
The legislation updates legal standards, and judges must consider and clarify factors that can limit shared parenting time for a minor child.
Enhancements to Child Protection Measures
Foremost, Greyson’s Law mandates new considerations for family courts’ decisions on custody and visitation plans.
Judges now must formally take into account the dynamics of domestic violence (including sexual violence), coercive control, parental harm, and their impact on the child. Courts have greater discretion to order supervised visitation or even suspend access in cases with a documented history of domestic abuse.
The goal is to keep kids safe and out of imminent danger.
Amendments to Florida Statutes
Amendment to Fla. Stat. §61.13: Consideration of Domestic Violence
Greyson’s Law amended Fla. Stat. §61.13, covering “Support of children; parenting and time-sharing; powers of court.”
It requires courts to consider any evidence of domestic violence, not just convictions. Moreover, evidence of domestic violence can create a rebuttable presumption that shared parental responsibility is not in the best interest of the child.
The law also requires a court to consider evidence that a parent has a reasonable belief that they, or the minor child, is in imminent danger by the other parent of domestic violence, child abuse, abandonment or neglect, or sexual violence.
These changes aim to prioritize the safety and wellbeing of children by ensuring that a parent’s history of violence is factored into judicial determinations regarding shared parental responsibility.
Update to Fla. Stat. §741.30: Strengthening Injunctions Against Abusers
The law also updates Fla. Stat. §741.30, making it easier for courts to deny custody or visitation rights to individuals who have violated restraining orders. This amendment protects children and their custodial parents from potential harm by restricting access for those disregarding legal injunctions to ensure family safety.
By baking in more rigorous standards around the effects of domestic violence, the hope is to prevent slip-ups in family court rulings that place children at risk.
Greyson’s Law shifted Florida closer to model rules standardizing child wellbeing as the priority in custody cases strained by patterns of abuse.
Impact of Greyson’s Law on Families
Greyson's Law Florida
Greyson’s Law sets new precedents for how family courts in Florida must navigate custody and visitation decisions in the context of domestic violence.
It aims to prevent oversight or leniency that places abused parents and children further in harm’s way.
Changes in Custody and Visitation Determinations
Florida law now requires judges to formally consider domestic abuse, coercive behaviors, and their effects on the child when weighing parenting time options.
Whether granting full custody or creating a timeshare calendar, the court must demonstrate it accounted for any documented history of violence, control tactics, and violations of past restraining orders.
Supervised visitation or outright suspension of access are also more easily justified, especially if the abusive parent disregards injunctions meant to protect the family.
In this sense, the law constrains judicial discretion by spelling out specific risk factors that should limit unsupervised shared custody arrangements.
Broader Implications for Domestic Violence Cases
More broadly, family attorneys see Greyson’s Law as redefining how seriously courts must take allegations of domestic violence when settling divorce and custody issues.
Judges can no longer claim unawareness or downplay patterns of abusive conduct under the guise of keeping both parents involved in the child’s life. This shifts leverage to the protective parent.
The law thus puts abusive parents on notice that subsequent restraint, counseling, and demonstrated change may be prerequisites to petitioning for future custody rights.
Simply avoiding more arrests may not suffice if a well-documented history of violence already works against them in family court under Greyson’s Law.
Summing it Up
As Greyson’s Law signifies, profound change can arise from unimaginable tragedy. The legislation firmly sets new guidelines for prioritizing child safety through restrictions on visitation and custody transfers relative to perpetrators of abuse.— with Suzanne E Williams, P.A. See less

05/12/2026

Call now to connect with business.

05/12/2026

GOOD QUESTION:
Am I responsible for my spouse’s student loans?
written by Mark Abzug.

As you and your spouse end the marriage, you might worry that your spouse’s education debt will become your burden after the divorce. The answer depends on two distinct steps: how the debt is classified and how the court decides to share it.

Is the debt marital?
The first thing a court looks at is when the debt was created. This is a strict rule, not a matter of opinion.

Pre-marital loans: If your spouse took out student loans before you were married, that debt is generally considered their separate, non-marital liability. You are typically not responsible for it, even if you helped them make payments during the marriage.
Loans during marriage: If the loans were taken out after your wedding date, Florida law presumes they are marital debt. This applies even if the loan is only in your spouse’s name and was used strictly for their tuition. Legally, the starting point is that you both owe this money.
Establishing this timeline provides the necessary legal framework before the court considers the fairness of the division.

Is the division fair?
Just because a debt is “marital” does not mean you automatically split it 50-50. Florida follows the principle of equitable distribution, which focuses on fairness.

A judge has the discretion to assign a marital student loan entirely to the spouse who earned the degree. To do this, they look at specific “fairness” factors:

Who benefits: Will the degree allow your spouse to earn a significantly higher income that you will no longer share?
Purpose of funds: Was the money used strictly for tuition, or did it pay for your household rent and groceries?
Economic standing: Does one spouse have a much greater ability to pay the debt than the other?
While the debt may technically be “marital” because of the date it was signed, an attorney can argue that it is inequitable for you to pay for a degree you will not benefit from.

Protecting your credit score
A divorce decree does not automatically remove your name from a loan document. Lenders are not part of the court proceedings and may still look to you for payment if your former spouse defaults. An attorney can help you structure a settlement to ensure your financial independence is protected.

Call Suzanne E. Williams at 954-765-1200 for a free 30 minute consultation regarding any marital, family and divorce matters.

Call now to connect with business.

Florida Prenuptial and Postnuptial Agreement Guide (2025)Get insights on how marital agreements work, including spousal ...
07/30/2025

Florida Prenuptial and Postnuptial Agreement Guide (2025)
Get insights on how marital agreements work, including spousal support, legal rights, and the impact on your assets.

In this article, we’ll break down:

Prenuptial vs. Postnuptial Agreements: What’s the Difference?
Florida Premarital Agreement Statute – Florida Statute 61.079
What Can Be Included in a Florida Premarital Agreement?
Requirements for Enforceability in Florida
When Can a Prenup Be Invalidated?
Modifying a Premarital Agreement
The Importance of Legal Counsel for a Premarital Agreement in Florida
Premarital agreements in Florida aren’t just for the wealthy or for celebrities—more and more people are opting to protect their interests in writing before tying the knot. Whether you’re entering your first marriage, bringing children or assets from a prior relationship, or just want clarity about your financial future, a prenuptial agreement can provide protection and peace of mind.

Prenuptial vs. Postnuptial Agreements: What’s the Difference?
Prenuptial agreements, also known as prenups, are signed before the marriage takes place. These agreements must be in writing, signed by both parties, and become effective once the parties are married. Prenups are typically used if one or both parties have significant assets, own a business, or have children from a previous relationship. These agreements enable the couple to feel confident that, should the marriage end, any assets they have that predate the marriage will be protected.

In contrast, postnuptial agreements are signed after the marriage. They’re often used to address significant changes in one person’s financial status following the marriage. For example, if one spouse comes into a significant inheritance or starts a business, they might request a postnuptial agreement.

Additional differences between prenuptial and postnuptial (antenuptial) agreements include:

1. Consideration:

Prenuptial agreements require the marriage itself as sufficient legal consideration.
Postnuptial agreements require additional consideration, such as a mutual exchange of property rights or promises, as the marriage has already been established.
2. Full Disclosure Requirements:

Prenuptial agreements often hinge less on full and fair disclosure since the marriage has yet to occur, although fairness and voluntariness must still be ensured.
Postnuptial agreements demand stricter adherence to full and frank financial disclosure at the time of ex*****on due to the fiduciary relationship between spouses during marriage.
3. Judicial Scrutiny and Fairness:

Prenuptial agreements are generally scrutinized under contract law principles, ensuring they are not the product of fraud, duress, or coercion:
Under Florida law, “[v]alid prenuptial agreements regarding post-dissolution [sic] support are contracts.” Lashkajani v. Lashkajani, 911 So. 2d 1154, 1158 (Fla. 2005). Prenuptial agreements and marital settlement agreements are to be construed in the same manner as any other contract.

See: Watts v. Goetz – 311 So.3d 253.

Postnuptial agreements face heightened scrutiny because spouses are expected to act in a fiduciary-like capacity towards one another. The courts have held that parties to an antenuptial agreement do not deal at arm’s length and, therefore, must exercise a high degree of good faith:
He is correct that the parties to an antenuptial agreement do not deal at arm’s length and therefore must exercise a high degree of good faith and candor in their dealings.

See: Carnell v. Carnell – 398 So.2d 503.

Furthermore, the courts have held that the relationship between parties to an antenuptial agreement is one of mutual trust and confidence:

“[I]t is black letter law that the parties to an antenuptial agreement do not deal at arm[‘]s length with each other.” Lutgert v. Lutgert, 338 So. 2d 1111, 1115 (Fla. 2d DCA 1976). Rather, “[t]heir relationship is one of mutual trust and confidence.” Id. (footnote omitted). As such, “the parties must exercise the highest degree of good faith, candor[,] and sincerity in all matters bearing on the terms and ex*****on of the proposed agreement, with [f]airness being the ultimate measure.” Id. (footnote omitted).

See: Ziegler v. Natera – 279 So.3d 1240.

4. Modification and Revocation:

Prenuptial agreements, generally speaking, cannot be modified unless explicitly permitted by the terms of the agreement or through mutual consent. However, see below for more information on circumstances when a prenuptial agreement can be modified.
Postnuptial agreements are easier to modify or revoke through mutual agreement, usually in writing.
5. Burden of Proof:

For prenuptial agreements, the spouse contesting the agreement must often prove unfairness or invalidity.
For postnuptial agreements, the spouse benefiting disproportionately may bear the burden to prove fairness and voluntariness.
6. Fairness at Ex*****on vs. Current Fairness:

Evaluation of prenuptial agreements considers fairness at the time of ex*****on, even if outcomes appear inequitable upon enforcement.
Postnuptial agreements must meet fairness standards both at ex*****on and during enforcement due to the ongoing fiduciary relationship.
7. Waiving Spousal Rights and Obligations:

Prenuptial agreements can waive certain future marital rights like alimony or equitable property distribution upon divorce, provided waivers are explicit.
Postnuptial agreements may waive similar rights, but courts are less likely to enforce waivers that result in significant hardship to an already dependent spouse due to the heightened fiduciary duty.
8. Timing of Assets:

Prenuptial agreements are more likely to account for property and obligations brought into the marriage.
Postnuptial agreements often address assets and obligations that have developed or evolved during the marriage.
Florida Premarital Agreement Statute – Florida Statute 61.079
In Florida, the legislature enacted Florida Statute 61.079 which is based on the Uniform Premarital Agreement Act (UPAA). This act standardizes premarital agreements across many states. The key points of Florida’s statute include:

Prenuptial agreements are effective only upon legal marriage.
If an agreement was signed involuntarily or the result of fraud, duress, or coercion, it is not enforceable.
Agreements allow couples to define property rights, alimony, life insurance, estate planning, and more.
A prenuptial agreement cannot affect a child’s right to support.
A couple can amend or revoke a prenuptial agreement if both parties agree.
Spousal support waivers may be invalidated if enforcement causes a party to qualify for public assistance.
Even in void marriages, courts may enforce prenups to prevent injustice.
The statute of limitations is paused during the marriage, but defenses such as laches and estoppel may still apply.
The statute ensures prenuptial agreements do not conflict with Florida’s Probate Code.
Note: Prenuptial agreements are typically used to protect assets that predate the marriage. Anything acquired during the marriage due to the contribution of both spouses through their work or service is considered marital property and is treated differently during the dissolution of the marriage.

What Can Be Included in a Florida Premarital Agreement?
According to the statute, a prenuptial agreement can provide for the management of property and how property is divided upon divorce or death. It can also specify life insurance beneficiaries and include the waiver of spousal support. Prenuptial agreements may also determine which laws will be used to interpret the agreement. However, there are limits to what a premarital agreement can cover. Florida law sets clear boundaries. According to Florida Statute 61.079(4):

“Parties to a premarital agreement may contract with respect to:

The rights and obligations of each of the parties in any of the property of either or both of them whenever and wherever acquired or located;
The right to buy, sell, use, transfer, exchange, abandon, lease, consume, expend, assign, create a security interest in, mortgage, encumber, dispose of, or otherwise manage and control property;
The disposition of property upon separation, marital dissolution, death, or the occurrence or nonoccurrence of any other event;
The establishment, modification, waiver, or elimination of spousal support;
The making of a will, trust, or other arrangement to carry out the provisions of the agreement;
The ownership rights in and disposition of the death benefit from a life insurance policy;
The choice of law governing the construction of the agreement; and
Any other matter, including their personal rights and obligations, not in violation of either the public policy of this state or a law imposing a criminal penalty.”
Note: The statute emphasizes that the right of a child to support may not be adversely affected by a premarital agreement. Nor can a prenuptial agreement dictate child custody arrangements.

Requirements for Enforceability in Florida
To be enforceable under Florida law, a premarital agreement must meet the requirements for fairness, voluntariness, and disclosure. Both spouses must act in good faith and provide a full disclosure, or fair approximation, of their financial situation.

If there is evidence of fraud, duress, or coercion, this may nullify the agreement. In addition, the agreement must be fair and reasonable based on the circumstances of both parties at the time the agreement was signed. If the disadvantaged spouse was not given a reasonable understanding of the other spouse’s assets and income, the agreement may not be enforceable.

Oral prenups are not enforceable. Any nuptial agreement must be made in writing and signed by both parties, voluntarily. Notarization is not a legal requirement, but it’s easier to enforce an agreement if it has been notarized.

Note: Florida courts scrutinize prenuptial agreements, especially if there is a significant power imbalance. In general, features such as waiving spousal support, attorney fees, or claims to property in the event of a divorce are enforceable. However, there may be judicial review if the prenuptial agreement attempts to negatively impact public policies, such as ensuring spousal support during marriage.

When Can a Prenup Be Invalidated?
Under Florida law, a prenuptial agreement can be invalidated for a variety of reasons, including:

Lack of Independent Counsel: A prenup is more likely to be upheld if both parties had access to their own independent legal counsel before signing it, because this ensures both individuals were aware of the implications of the agreement.
Coercion or Duress: If one spouse pressures the other or rushes the agreement before the wedding, the coerced spouse may be able to challenge the agreement in court. If coercion or duress is found, the agreement would no longer pass the requirements for fairness and voluntariness.
Unconscionable Terms: Grossly one-sided provisions may be deemed unfair and unenforceable.
Incomplete Financial Disclosure: Both parties must truthfully and thoroughly share details of their assets, income, and liabilities. If they’re unable to provide information, a reasonable approximation must be provided.
Improper Ex*****on: Agreements must be made in writing, signed, and witnessed. Having a prenuptial agreement notarized is not legally required in Florida, but it may help ensure the agreement is enforceable.
Invalid Provisions: Attempting to include provisions that go beyond the scope of what’s permitted for prenuptial agreements (e.g., child custody or support arrangements) could render the entire agreement void.
Changed Circumstances: Certain clauses in a prenuptial agreement may become invalid if there is a significant change in the circumstances of one or both members of the couple.
In Bates v. Bates, 345 So.3d 328, the court held, “There are two distinct grounds for invalidating a prenuptial agreement: (1) where the defending spouse has engaged in “fraud, deceit, duress, coercion, misrepresentation, or overreaching”; and (2) where “the agreement makes an unfair or unreasonable provision for [the challenging] spouse, given the [relative] circumstances of the parties.”

Modifying a Premarital Agreement
Under Florida law, premarital agreements can be modified after marriage as long as both parties agree in writing to the changes. Modifications occur if the agreement explicitly permits a change or if the parties mutually consent to a change.

The enforceability of a modified premarital agreement is subject to the same conditions as the original agreement. This means that the modified agreement must not be the product of fraud, duress, coercion, or overreaching, and it must not be unconscionable at the time it was executed. If these conditions are met, the modified agreement will be enforceable in the same manner as the original premarital agreement (Florida Statute 61.079).

Judicial Modifications Related to Alimony (Spousal Support)
Certain provisions within a prenuptial agreement, such as those related to spousal support, may be subject to judicial modification. For example, depending on the language in the agreement, prenuptial agreements that limit alimony to a certain amount may be modified by the court under changed circumstances, as provided in section 61.14 of the Florida Statutes. This judicial oversight ensures that the terms of the agreement remain fair and reasonable in light of any significant changes in the parties’ circumstances.

Florida courts have also ruled on the issue of modifying premarital agreements related to alimony:

Prenuptial agreements limiting alimony to a certain amount are subject to judicial modification. See Posner v. Posner, 233 So.2d 381, 385–86 (Fla.1970) (“Posner I ”) (an antenuptial agreement settling alimony rights is subject to increase or decrease under changed conditions as provided in section 61.14, Florida Statutes, as the parties are assumed to have known of the existence of the statute when they made their agreement); Posner v. Posner, 257 So.2d 530, 534 (Fla.1972) (“Posner II ”) (“a change in circumstances of the party since the date of the agreement can be considered by the [c]hancellor in modification of support and alimony provided for in an antenuptial agreement”); Lashkajani v. Lashkajani, 911 So.2d 1154, 1156–57 (Fla.2005) (discussing evolution of law in Posner I & II ).

See: Hahamovitch v. Hahamovitch, 133 So.3d 1008

The Importance of Legal Counsel for a Premarital Agreement in Florida
Having experienced legal representation is one of the most critical steps in creating an enforceable, effective prenup. A family law attorney can:

Ensure full and fair financial disclosure
Draft customized terms tailored to your relationship and long-term goals
Avoid invalid provisions or ex*****on mistakes
Help you understand your rights and obligations
Reduce the chance of future litigation by making the agreement fair and clear
Courts place significant weight on whether each party had legal counsel when evaluating the validity of a premarital agreement

Address

401 E. Las Olas Boulevard Ste 1400
Fort Lauderdale, FL
33301

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when Suzanne E Williams, P.A. posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Contact The Practice

Send a message to Suzanne E Williams, P.A.:

Share