10/30/2026
AI Chat = Exhibit A?
WHAT YOU SHARE WITH YOUR AI PLATFORM TODAY, COULD BE THE OPPOSING PARTY'S EXHIBIT "A" TOMORROW.
People are turning to ChatGPT, Claude, and other AI platforms for help with business decisions, personal disputes, legal research, and court filings. In a 2026 survey by the Thomson Reuters Institute and the National Center for State Courts, almost two-thirds of court professionals surveyed reported seeing more AI-written filings or motions from people representing themselves.
AI can help organize information and explain unfamiliar concepts. But before sharing sensitive facts, consider the record you are creating. Your questions, uploaded documents, instructions, and follow-up conversations may reveal what you knew, what you intended, and how your decisions developed. If a lawsuit follows, the other side may seek that history.
This is already happening.
A BUSINESS STRATEGY BECOMES COURTROOM EVIDENCE
In Fortis Advisors v. Krafton, a corporate acquisition included a potential $250 million earnout payment to the sellers. As concerns about that obligation grew, the buyer’s CEO consulted ChatGPT about a strategy for taking control of the acquired business.
The Delaware court’s March 2026 opinion recounted those AI exchanges while examining the company’s conduct. The court found contractual breaches, ordered the acquired company’s CEO reinstated, and extended the earnout measurement period.
The lesson is practical: an AI conversation used to develop a business strategy can later become part of the evidence used to evaluate that strategy.
ASKING AI FOR LEGAL HELP DOES NOT CREATE ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE
In United States v. Heppner, a criminal defendant independently used Claude to analyze his legal exposure. His inputs included information received from his attorneys, and he later shared the resulting materials with his defense team.
Records of those exchanges were recovered during an FBI search. The court rejected his claims of attorney-client privilege and work-product protection. The chatbot was not his attorney. Sending the results to his lawyers afterward did not make the earlier exchanges protected.
WHAT IF YOU ARE REPRESENTING YOURSELF?
Several courts have recognized work-product protection for AI exchanges genuinely used by self-represented litigants to prepare their cases.
In Assini v. Hayward, a New York court quashed subpoenas seeking a pro se defendant’s ChatGPT prompts, uploads, and outputs used for litigation preparation. Other courts have similarly protected AI-assisted research, drafting, and strategy.
These decisions are fact-specific trial-court rulings from other jurisdictions, not a blanket guarantee of protection or binding Alabama precedent.
Nor does that protection place an entire AI account beyond discovery. A conversation about preparing a defense is different from a conversation used to draft an allegedly defamatory post, develop a business plan, or analyze someone else’s confidential information. Relevant exchanges concerning the underlying conduct may be discoverable.
Representing yourself later does not retroactively protect earlier activity. Although litigation preparation can qualify before a lawsuit is filed, merely asking a legal question does not establish that protection.
DOES DELETING THE CHAT SOLVE THE PROBLEM?
Do not assume so. Deleting a conversation from your screen does not guarantee that every copy has disappeared. Provider-retained records, screenshots, exports, or forwarded content may remain.
Once litigation is reasonably foreseeable, you may have a legal duty to preserve relevant information, including AI conversations. Deleting it can create a separate problem involving destruction of evidence and possible sanctions—even before a complaint or subpoena arrives.
USE AI WITH AN UNDERSTANDING OF THE RISKS
AI conversations are not automatically discoverable, and legitimate protections remain available. Requests must satisfy the applicable discovery rules, and obtaining records directly from a provider raises additional legal questions.
But a private account is not the same thing as a privileged conversation.
Before uploading confidential documents, recounting sensitive events, or asking AI to help plan your next move, consider whether you would be comfortable explaining that exchange under oath.
You may think your conversation with AI exists in a private virtual world, beyond anyone else’s reach. But in a real-world courtroom, it could become the opposing party’s Exhibit A.
John Saylor | Your Local Lawyer™
If you found this information helpful, please LIKE and SHARE. For an appointment concerning litigation, privacy, or another civil legal matter, call 256-740-3131 or email [email protected].
No representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of the legal services performed by other lawyers.
Hiring an attorney is an important decision that should not be based solely on Facebook posts or advertising. Information on this page or my website is provided for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. Consult an attorney regarding your individual situation. Contacting this office does not, by itself, establish an attorney-client relationship. Please do not send confidential information until an attorney-client relationship has been established.