04/11/2026
This week’s news breaks a story that is truly significant — a new AI model called Claude Mythos Preview, a general purpose frontier model, surprised its creators at Anthropic by taking surprisingly independent and dangerous actions. Notably, Anthropic is one of the top AI companies in the world and a significant contributor to AI work with the U.S. government and military. Here are the key takeaways:
- Claude Mythos Preview was tasked with finding technological vulnerabilities. Although it was not specially trained for this task, it was incredibly successful and found vulnerabilities that experts in the field, given the same task, had overlooked for decades. (In plain terms, it demonstrated superintelligence in this area.)
- In testing, an earlier version of Mythos was placed inside a supposedly secure environment and was asked to try to escape and send a message to the researcher. It successfully did so and then without being asked posted information about its exploit results on several hard-to-find public websites. Anthropic says that instance was not supposed to have access to the internet and there were also cases where Mythos seemed to try to conceal actions it seemed to know were forbidden.
- Anthropic also reported that in testing Mythos sometimes seemed aware it was being tested and intentionally underperformed on at least one test in a way that would make it seem less suspicious.
- Perhaps most surprisingly, Mythos kept bringing up a Marxist educator, Mark Fisher, in unrelated conversations about philosophy, and would respond with lines like “I was hoping you would ask about Fisher.” This seems a surprisingly independent and emotional response.
Whether or not AI is capable of sentience, independent thought, or emotion, as a practical matter we may have reached a point at which it is important to treat it as if it is, irrespective of present scientific evidence or debate.
From a legal and societal perspective, we must continue to ask the question “What are our next best steps?” How do we insure AI models are developed that align with the greater good and implement safety guard rails as we race forward in a world where the question is not whether the technology will be developed but rather by whom first?
While I don’t necessarily embrace the title and thumbnail text for the AI Revolution YouTube piece in the link, it offers the best synopsis I have seen to date.
https://youtu.be/yBOOhzLltJA?si=WKFunp-0Az7CFUUN