07/14/2026
The University of Chicago Law School just published its AI strategy.
Beginning this Fall semester, 1L students will have no laptops, no phones, and no tablets in their core courses. Exams will be in person without access to the internet, electronic files, or apps. Further, students writing a research paper will now sit down with their professor in person and answer questions about it after they submit it. AI can write a paper. It cannot defend one in real time.
One aspect of this new strategy is key: the law school states that many aspects of legal practice will remain the domain of humans, not merely because humans are good at them, but because clients, employers, judges, and society will want humans to perform them.
This observation does not argue that "AI can't do this yet." Instead, the argument is that even when AI can do something, people will still want a human doing it, whether that is arguing in a courtroom, making a judgment call under pressure, or sitting with a client who is simply overwhelmed and needs someone in which to confide, to trust.
What we still want humans to do, and whether we are building the conditions for them to actually be able to do it, is a question worth asking in every institution right now. It seems that the University of Chicago School of Law is on the right track!
The University of Chicago Law School today released an AI Strategy Statement reflecting a new vision for legal education in the age of artificial intelligence. The strategy statement, titled, “Rethinking Legal Education in the AI Era,” focuses on bolstering both essential legal skills, such as c...