Law Office of Carol A. Wilson, PLLC

Law Office of Carol A. Wilson, PLLC First and foremost the Law Office of Carol A. Wilson PLLC works by the Golden Rule: Treat clients as I knew it would be a big commitment to go to law school.

As I reflect on 25 years of my own law firm and 34 years practicing law it is amazing how each experience has built one upon the other. It has been my goal since junior high school to be a trial lawyer. I have always been an avid reader of history, and the history books I read taught me that many of the people who influenced events for the better were lawyers. Since opening my own law firm Novembe

r 1, 1995, I have chosen to welcome people of all races, creeds, and sexual identity and do my best to treat my clients as I would want to be treated given their facts and the law. Years ago, when I met Stanley Marcus, he told me to “Practice the Golden Rule – there is none better!” I have taken his advice to heart and use it with every client considering that client’s facts and Texas law. I recognize that my clients are going through difficult times – issues causing divorce, and disputes involving child custody and child support are inherently emotionally charged and stressful for those living through them and for their families. I advocate for my client’s and their children’s best interests while minimizing the disruptions that can occur during these stressful situations. For almost 35 years, I have litigated and tried complex divorce, property division, and child custody cases. I did not have any family members or friends whom I could ask about the practice of law. Therefore I took every law related internship opportunity available to me to see if being a lawyer really was what I wanted to do. I liked each facet of the practice of law to which those internships exposed me. After graduating college in 3 years, I worked a year for a United States Senator in Washington D.C. and waitressed at night to save money to pay my living expenses during law school the next year. That year was valuable on my path toward law school. When I arrived in Dallas in the fall of 1982 to attend law school at SMU, I had never been to Texas, did not have a car and lived in the law student dorm on the Quad at SMU. During my second and third years of law school I clerked for a family law boutique firm. It was there that I first heard about Board Certification in Family Law and came to understand that was the next goal after passing the Bar for skilled family law lawyers in Texas. It was also there that I began enjoying family law work. I realized family law involves many evidentiary hearings and trials. Family law is always interesting and allows me to help people, even during some of the most emotionally stressful times of their lives. While all of that exposure to the law, my coursework and life experiences were valuable, law school was still very difficult. It took perseverance and determination to meet my goal to graduate law school, pass the bar and become a trial lawyer. Like all young lawyers, some of my early jobs were filled with educational experiences I did not want to repeat. Nevertheless, the attorneys in my family law clerkship encouraged me to take the opportunity to work with a highly experienced Board Certified trial lawyer. From him I learned all the things law school did not teach me. There were three maxims he taught that I continue to live by: 1) If you are prepared and the law and the evidence are in your favor either you will do well in court or your opponent will settle because they do not want to deal with you; 2) Know how to do what you are asking your subordinates to do; and 3) Don’t panic over the problem, find a solution to the problem. In 1995, I opened my own office on my 35th birthday. It was never my goal to own my law firm. I was a history major and never had a business class in my life. I began my “business education” by reading books written by Carl Sewell and Stanley Marcus. Other books, seminars and friends added to that education over the years. Customer service, treating my clients as I would want to be treated in the same circumstances and continued goal setting were some of the lessons I learned. I was very fortunate with my first office. I sublet a full-size office that had been used for storage in a very nice building on Turtle Creek Boulevard. The landlord said if I moved the boxes into his storage facility, I could have the furniture that was in the room. The rent was $500 per month, the furniture was beautiful, and I still use all of it today. Later on, that same landlord allowed me to use his highly experienced legal assistant by the hour when she was not busy with his work. Without the financial stress of paying a staff person full time I had a highly experienced and wise legal assistant able to proof my work, create necessary closing documents and help prepare for hearings and trials. Her assistance and experience added greatly to my practice in a manner I could afford. Shortly after I opened my own office, I was asked to write the civil evidence case summary of the prior year’s cases for the Texas Tech Law Review. I was thrilled to have the opportunity to have a published law review article as I had not been on law review at SMU. Publishing a law review article gave me a bit more credibility as a lawyer, especially as I was establishing my own law firm. In 2008 I was nominated by a friend to join the Annette Stewart Inns of Court. With that group I traveled to Washington D.C. to be sworn in to the United States Supreme Court Bar in April 2016. Although I had attended several Supreme Court arguments in prior years, it was an affirming experience to realize that I had indeed reached my childhood goal of being a lawyer, am living the life of a trial lawyer and could now argue a case before the United States Supreme Court. Our daughter was able to make the trip with me and I was thrilled to share that moment with her. In 2020 I was pleased begin a formal Of Counsel relationship with Siebman Forrest Burg & Smith, LLP. Clyde M. Siebman and I joined forces to turn our long-standing friendship, beginning as law school classmates at SMU, into a mutual business partnership, benefiting the clients of both firms in the courtroom and in dispute resolution. In effect, a powerful one-two punch can be leveraged on our clients’ behalf involving civil litigation and intellectual property cases along with community property issues, marital agreements, divorces and custody cases. Over the years I have learned that having my Board Certification in Family Law positively effected my professional career by enhancing my credibility and reputation in family law and indicated to others that I had the experience to tackle complicated cases. All of which are valuable both inside and outside the courtroom. I look forward to serving my clients for the next 10 years.

Traumatic injuries are life-changing, and, as any family lawyer can attest, they are also often marriage-ending because ...
06/02/2026

Traumatic injuries are life-changing, and, as any family lawyer can attest, they are also often marriage-ending because of the physical, emotional, and financial stress the injury puts on a relationship.

If the injury resulted in a payment, such as from an insurance company or other responsible party, those funds are considered the separate property of the injured person, according to Texas Family Code §3.001(3).

That’s the easy part.

- Keep PI Payout Funds Separate -

To keep things easy, here’s what I advise married clients who receive such a recovery:

1) Deposit the personal injury recovery into an account labeled for that purpose and kept separate from community funds. Don’t let the personal injury recovery check be deposited into the joint checking account.

2) Segregate any reimbursement for lost earnings, medical expenses, and other expenses incurred with the injury. Reimbursement for those expenses is community property. Thornhill v. Thornhill, 666 S.W.3d 823 (Tex. App. – Houston [14th Dist.] 2023, no pet.)

3) In the event of divorce, both of these steps must be proven by clear and convincing evidence, TFC §3.003.

As for the consequences of comingling, read on:
https://cawilsonlaw.com/client-resources/f/personal-injury-payouts-in-texas-divorce-what-you-need-to-know

From visitation and custody, to whether we can get the other side to pay attorney fees, our latest newsletter answers th...
05/20/2026

From visitation and custody, to whether we can get the other side to pay attorney fees, our latest newsletter answers the top three frequently asked questions we get from clients.

Read on to see if your question makes the list, and don't forget to subscribe for more family law updates:
https://mailchi.mp/b4666350596f/our-clients-top-three-faqs

There are many misconceptions about Texas divorce laws. These are three of the questions Carol is asked most frequently:...
05/13/2026

There are many misconceptions about Texas divorce laws. These are three of the questions Carol is asked most frequently:

1. At what age can children refuse to visit the other parent?

Children can choose not to visit the other parent at age 18 (Texas Family Code §157.004). Children can tell the Court in a non-jury trial at age 12 which parent they want to primarily live with. If a parent’s lawyer, the amicus attorney, or the attorney ad litem asks the Court to interview a child aged 12 or older, the Court “shall” interview the child in chambers and “may” interview a child under age 12.

The Court may allow the attorneys to be present during the interview. If any attorney in the case asks, the interview shall be recorded by the court reporter for a child 12 or older. The Court is not required to grant the child’s wishes (TFC §153.009). The statute does not say what happens in jury trials under these circumstances.

Otherwise, a parent must have the child ready and able, if not willing, to transfer to the other parent as scheduled in the Court’s order. If not, that parent risks receiving a motion for enforcement of the existing visitation order. If the motion for enforcement is granted, the parent may have to pay the attorney fees of the other side, may have to pay a fine, may get a judgment entered against them, and could go to jail. This is true particularly if the Court decides one parent is not encouraging or doing everything possible for the child to visit the other parent (TFC §157.001, 157.167).

2. What does it take to get “sole custody” of my children? Read on:
https://cawilsonlaw.com/client-resources/f/my-3-most-frequently-asked-family-law-questions

It's always nice to hear kind words from clients. Thank you to B.T. for this glowing review.Read more client testimonial...
05/06/2026

It's always nice to hear kind words from clients. Thank you to B.T. for this glowing review.

Read more client testimonials: https://cawilsonlaw.com/

This month, the newsletter is shining a spotlight on an organization that is important to everyone at the firm, Attorney...
04/28/2026

This month, the newsletter is shining a spotlight on an organization that is important to everyone at the firm, Attorneys Serving the Community.

Read on to learn more about this year's ASC beneficiary, and to discover the other networking and philanthropic events the organization plans throughout the year. https://mailchi.mp/3d77fbc1ddfa/spotlight-on-asc-gives-back?e=0021bcc73d

One of the most important property division issues divorcing couples face is how to divide their retirement plans. After...
04/16/2026

One of the most important property division issues divorcing couples face is how to divide their retirement plans. After all, they have probably been saving the money for decades, and it is how most of us plan to fund our “golden years.”
Retirement plans are divided as a part of the overall property division in the divorce. It does not matter which spouse earned the retirement money that was accumulated during the marriage.

Community or Separate Property?

The first question in the analysis of retirement assets is to ask whether the retirement is separate or community property, or a portion in each category. The portion of a retirement plan that is proven to be earned prior to marriage remains separate property and the portion earned during the marriage is community property.
The second question in the analysis is whether the plan is a defined benefit plan, which is usually a pension; a defined contribution plan, which is usually a 401k, 403(b) or similar; an IRA of some kind; or some other kind of executive retirement compensation.

Next, get to know your QDRO:
https://cawilsonlaw.com/client-resources/f/how-are-retirement-plans-divided-in-divorce

We offer CLE (and cookies)! 🍪 Carol Wilson's CLE program, "First Subtract, Then Divide: Texas Separate and Community Pro...
04/02/2026

We offer CLE (and cookies)! 🍪

Carol Wilson's CLE program, "First Subtract, Then Divide: Texas Separate and Community Property," is offered as either a lunch-and-learn or a happy hour. Both formats provide 1.25 hours of and continuing ed credits. The course is also approved for Board Certified lawyers in family law and probate.

We do all the work! Our firm provides boxed lunches for lunchtime events, and charcuterie for happy hour presentations. Regardless of timing, Carol also provide her homemade cookies so that nobody leaves without satisfying their sweet tooth.

Follow the link to talk CLE: https://buff.ly/z1KTY4P

In an effort to save money, it can be tempting to download a legal document from the internet and use it instead of cons...
03/25/2026

In an effort to save money, it can be tempting to download a legal document from the internet and use it instead of consulting an attorney. A recent case, however, highlights the costly perils of using DIY legal documents.

A Texas appeals court recently ruled that, although the online premarital agreement a couple used was valid, the language in it was vague — and that vagueness worked to the detriment of the husband, who had hoped to walk away from the marriage with the house and the truck.

In the case, the DIY premarital agreement contained a seemingly straightforward clause: “All property acquired by each during the marriage shall be deemed their property.” The husband interpreted this to mean that any assets purchased during the marriage, including a house and a pickup truck, would be his separate property.

Wrong.

The trial court, and subsequently the Court of Appeals, disagreed. While the court found the premarital agreement to be valid, it also deemed it "replete with ambiguity and uncertainty." The court clarified that the word "their" typically refers to plural possession, not singular. Therefore, the property acquired during the marriage was considered community property, subject to division upon divorce.

Consequently, the Court awarded the pickup and a share of the house purchased during the marriage to the wife as community property.

Read on for more details.
https://cawilsonlaw.com/client-resources/f/diy-legal-documents-can-be-a-risky-bet

It's always nice to hear kind words from clients. Thank you to M. for this glowing review.Read more client testimonials:...
03/18/2026

It's always nice to hear kind words from clients. Thank you to M. for this glowing review.

Read more client testimonials: https://cawilsonlaw.com/

Address

3710 Rawlins Street, Suite 1420
Dallas, TX
75219

Opening Hours

Monday 9am - 5pm
Tuesday 9am - 5pm
Wednesday 9am - 5pm
Thursday 9am - 5pm
Friday 9am - 12pm

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when Law Office of Carol A. Wilson, PLLC posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Contact The Practice

Send a message to Law Office of Carol A. Wilson, PLLC:

Featured

Share

Category