C. Norris Law Group

05/26/2026

NOT GUILTY ON THE SWITCH @ a bench trial. Client looking at 6 to 30 years if found guilty.

IGHT SO BOOM, client is not pictured he will be released tonight after spending 7 months in custody. So first shout out to the real boss in the video; HIS GIRL made SURE she got me. I stopped taking cases during the holidays last year but she SHOWED up and made sure to have her business straight. How could we say no?! WE DIDNT.

I tried to do a release hearing. Not happening. Client is a felon and was charged with a firearm exquipped with an extended magazine and a switch. NO GO. But we hard pivoted straight into trial. Watch out for the elbow cause he BALL over here.

Just because you’re detained pre-trial, does NOT mean you’re guilty.

Client was sole occupant and driver of the vehicle. Evidence came out at trial that he did not own the vehicle and Officers had no idea how long he was in the car. But we got a GEM at trial. Officer admitted to seeing the car earlier, not knowing if my client was in it, AND that there were 3 people in the car. BOOM.

Client pulled over on a traffic violation, no issues. Complied with officers during the initial part of the stop. His phone was hooked up to the car (state argued he intimately knew the car - naaaaah anyone can hook up thier phone to a car). So officer approached. Doesn’t see my client reaching in the car. Takes him out. No cuffs. Then searches: 1) under the seat, nothing; 2) pops open a compartment under the steering wheel, nothing; 3) center counsel, nope. It’s not till he takes my clients phone off the gear shift area, that he realizes it’s loose. So he opens the trap/slot finds the PEWPEW. Then walks over to where my client is and says “cuff him.”

Then and only then, does my client try to run. But he runs towards the car, NOT for the gun we argue; he’s yelling “baby they trying to mess with me.” State argued consciousness of guilt, he ran because he knew about the gun. Naaaaah.

I argue TIMING, he didn’t run till they cuff him (flight or fight mode) and he’s trying to communicate with his girl who is still on the phone, even officer was talking to her.

Only a crazy person runs to try to get a gun surrounded by armed officers. They take him down. Cuff him. No DNA, no fingerprints, no statements, NO CASE.

Court said it was super close those, and it was. BUT WE SLIIIIIDDDDDDD. CALLTHE NEXT CASE!!!!!

05/16/2026

YOU KNOW IT HITS DIFFERENT WHEN ITS 12 Count 1. Agg. Discharge of a Firearm 2. Agg Assault w/ a Deadly Weapon 3&4. Child Endangerment - NG ALL COUNTS. Client was facing 4@85% to 14@85% - I HIT AGAIN. 🦍🦍🦍

IGHT SO BOOM, this s**t right here!!!!! Man. So much has gone into this. So mom called me off the rip. A day after the incident the firm gets a call. 3 days later we set up a consult. 8 days later I’m hired and send a letter to the detectives. 14 days later we walk into the police station. My client is charged. Invokes his right to silence. They subpoena his GF to the Grand jury. I make sure she has an attorney.

My client is 32, registered gun owner, FOID CARD & CLL HOLDER. The only thing he is guilty of is loving a woman. He and his girl have to do a child exchange at the police station. And her bitter ass baby daddy wants to start s**t. He won’t back off. And follows my client out of the station while screaming at him to “CALL HIS PHONE” and even though it took 30 minutes to get him to admit it on the stand, it was so they could fight.

But why would my client want to fight him. We filed a motion asking for permission to bring up a previous incident where the BD put a gun in my clients face after he puts his hands on my clients girl (BD’s BM) cause my client had the audacity to protect her. So now they have to do kid exchanges at the police station. My client takes charge.

One day the BD has his panties in a bunch and starts s**t. My client tried to disengage but nothing is stopping this bully. He keep antagonizing and following my client, when his own kids are in the car. Threats are made. Road rage. My client ends up trying to shoot out the BD’s tires in defense of himself and the car to stop him. We argued that was reasonable. It was.

He has been locked up for 10 months, no arrest record. Today we went to trial. After SIX HOURS of deliberations the jury agreed. MY CLIENT WAS JUSTIFIED IN STOPPING THIS CRAZY DUDE. The star witness, the BD’a own daughter. Auntie CC was in full effect during that examination. We argued they didn’t have to bring her. The didn’t. F**K OUT OF HERE. 🎯🎯🎯

05/16/2026

(Forgot to Post on FB - late post 🖤😈)

YOU KNOW IT HITS DIFFERENT WHEN ITS 12 Count 1. Agg. Discharge of a Firearm 2. Agg Assault w/ a Deadly Weapon 3&4. Child Endangerment - NG ALL COUNTS. Client was facing 4@85% to 14@85% - I HIT AGAIN. 🦍🦍🦍

IGHT SO BOOM, this s**t right here!!!!! Man. So much has gone into this. So mom called me off the rip. A day after the incident the firm gets a call. 3 days later we set up a consult. 8 days later I’m hired and send a letter to the detectives. 14 days later we walk into the police station. My client is charged. Invokes his right to silence. They subpoena his GF to the Grand jury. I make sure she has an attorney.

My client is 32, registered gun owner, FOID CARD & CLL HOLDER. The only thing he is guilty of is loving a woman. He and his girl have to do a child exchange at the police station. And her bitter ass baby daddy wants to start s**t. He won’t back off. And follows my client out of the station while screaming at him to “CALL HIS PHONE” and even though it took 30 minutes to get him to admit it on the stand, it was so they could fight.

But why would my client want to fight him. We filed a motion asking for permission to bring up a previous incident where the BD put a gun in my clients face after he puts his hands on my clients girl (BD’s BM) cause my client had the audacity to protect her. So now they have to do kid exchanges at the police station. My client takes charge.

One day the BD has his panties in a bunch and starts s**t. My client tried to disengage but nothing is stopping this bully. He keep antagonizing and following my client, when his own kids are in the car. Threats are made. Road rage. My client ends up trying to shoot out the BD’s tires in defense of himself and the car to stop him. We argued that was reasonable. It was.

He has been locked up for 10 months, no arrest record. Today we went to trial. After SIX HOURS of deliberations the jury agreed. MY CLIENT WAS JUSTIFIED IN STOPPING THIS CRAZY DUDE. The star witness, the BD’a own daughter. Auntie CC was in full effect during that examination. We argued they didn’t have to bring her. The didn’t. F**K OUT OF HERE. 🎯🎯🎯

05/16/2026

misbehaved and making history

05/05/2026

What’s collected from the truck driver can shape how the crash is reviewed and who is held responsible.

Every detail matters.

04/17/2026

yall out here TERRORIZING my community but dancing is the problem?? welcome to my peaceful protest. DEFIANCE is resistance.

04/10/2026

Watch, follow, and discover more trending content.

03/10/2026

Armed Habitual Criminal (AKA Unlawful Possession of a Firearm by a Repeat Felony Offender) Class X; my guys was facing 6 to 30 years in the department of corrections; to be served at 85% - NOT GUILTY AFTER THE BENCH TRIAL. 🦍🖤

Ight so boom, one year to the DAY on March 10, 2025 my guy was pulled over by multiple members of for allegedly violating two stop signs and not having a seat belt on. We challenged the stop as we believed the officers were inconsistent in their observations, and, as fate would have it, conveniently didnt have any dash camera video of the violation (they never do even though it’s 2026). Shame.

Anywho, neither officer could remember whether the windows were tinted. They never saw my client get in the car. Didn’t know how long he had been driving it. Never saw him make movements towards the floor board. But upon their search found a firearm under the driver seat. Tried to say it was in arms reach. The vehicle was not my clients even though he was the driver. NO DEAL.

My guy was asked out the vehicle and exited without incident. He did not attempt to flee or resist the officers. When asked if there was any weapons in the car he stated NO, ON BODY WORN CAMERA (BWC). When he saw the firearm he out his head down.

But here is where it got tricky. The officer handcuffed and transported ny guy to the police station. Once they got to the door of the station the officer turns his BWC OFF. Apparently at this time was when my guys says, “I was trying to protect myself.” Yeah okay. Yall don’t find at suspicious??

Although the Court believed the officer: that he did hear this statement the burden of proof is BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT. Not enough. Statement was unclear and it simply couldn’t win the day. Judge found him NOT GUILTY. Client looked at me shocked, “what’s that mean Cierra?” IT MEANS WE GOING HOME BABY!! PSSSH. Peace. We GONE!!