What are the opening hours?

Monday 8am - 5pm Tuesday 8am - 5pm Wednesday 8am - 5pm Thursday 8am - 5pm Friday 8am - 5pm

Saluja Law

Call Directions Website Contact the practice

Immigration and Sports law firm located in West Virginia

10/27/2026

Federal Court Holds Immigration Officials in Contempt After Arrest Following Court-Ordered Release

A federal court in Pennsylvania has held immigration officials in civil contempt after agents arrested a man who had previously been released from immigration detention pursuant to a court order.

Nain Vasquez Gonzalez had spent more than three years in immigration detention. In April 2026, the court ordered his release after finding that his continued detention had become unconstitutionally prolonged under the circumstances of his case.

Approximately two months later, immigration agents arrested him again. He was detained for approximately 11 hours before being released. The court subsequently determined that the arrest was unauthorized and unlawful, and raised concerns about the government’s explanations and its compliance with orders seeking information about the incident.

The court held the Attorney General, the Secretary of Homeland Security, and the Philadelphia ICE Field Office Director in civil contempt and ordered payment of attorney fees and related costs.

This case underscores the importance of judicial oversight in immigration detention and compliance with court orders. Whether a subsequent arrest or detention is lawful depends on the facts, applicable law, and the terms of any existing order.

If you or a loved one is facing prolonged immigration detention or has been detained after a court-ordered release, an experienced immigration attorney can review the circumstances and discuss available options.

Saluja Law Offices, PLLC

This post is for general informational purposes and does not constitute legal advice.

10/08/2026

New Lawsuit Challenges USCIS Green Card Policies

A federal lawsuit filed October 5 in Massachusetts challenges two USCIS policies affecting people applying for permanent residence from within the United States.

The first concerns adjustment of status, the process that allows eligible applicants to obtain a green card without completing immigrant visa processing abroad. The plaintiffs argue that USCIS improperly treats an applicant’s choice to use this process as a negative factor.

The second concerns USCIS’s authority to deny applications without first requesting additional evidence or issuing a notice of intent to deny. The plaintiffs contend that, together, these policies could subject pending cases to new standards without giving applicants a meaningful opportunity to respond.

USCIS maintains that its approach reflects longstanding immigration law and the discretionary nature of adjustment of status. The lawsuit asks the court to block and set aside the policies. These allegations have not been established by a court, and filing the lawsuit does not itself suspend the policies.

What should applicants do? Continue attending interviews, responding to USCIS notices, and meeting deadlines. If your application is pending, discuss with your attorney whether additional evidence may be appropriate.

At Saluja Law Offices, PLLC, we understand that immigration uncertainty affects families, careers, and plans for the future. Each case requires careful attention to the applicant’s circumstances and the rules currently in effect.

General information only. This post does not constitute legal advice.

10/01/2026

Supreme Court to Review Immigration Detention Policy

The U.S. Supreme Court has agreed to hear a challenge to the Trump administration’s policy requiring certain noncitizens to remain detained during removal proceedings without an opportunity for an immigration bond hearing.

The dispute focuses on people who entered the United States without inspection, including those who have lived here for many years. The administration argues that federal law requires their detention. Challengers argue that many should be eligible for an individualized bond hearing. Federal appeals courts have reached conflicting conclusions.

What does this mean for individuals and families?

• The Supreme Court has agreed to review the issue but has not decided whether the policy is lawful.

• Acceptance of the case does not automatically authorize release or guarantee a bond hearing.

• A bond hearing provides an opportunity to request release. It does not guarantee release or resolve the underlying immigration case.

• Available legal options depend on the person’s entry history, detention circumstances, and applicable court decisions.

For families with a loved one in immigration custody, a timely legal review can help determine whether a bond request or federal court challenge may be available.

Saluja Law Offices, PLLC will continue monitoring this case and its implications for immigration detention.

To discuss an immigration detention matter, contact our office at 304-755-1101.

This post provides general information and is not legal advice.

09/28/2026

New public charge guidance is now in effect for many green card applicants.

As of September 18, 2026, USCIS may consider a broader range of means-tested public benefits when reviewing certain applications for adjustment of status. These may include food and housing assistance received on or after that date.

A public charge decision is still made case by case. USCIS considers factors such as age, health, family circumstances, finances, education, and skills. Receiving a benefit does not automatically make someone ineligible for a green card. Some applicants, including refugees, asylees, special immigrant juveniles, and certain victims of crime or trafficking, are exempt from the public charge ground.

The updated guidance applies to covered Forms I-485 postmarked or submitted electronically on or after September 18, 2026. If you are preparing to apply or have questions about benefits you received, Saluja Law Offices, PLLC can help you assess how the guidance applies to your circumstances.

This post is for general information and is not legal advice.

09/22/2026

The federal government has announced additional measures affecting the H-1B visa program.

A September 18, 2026 Presidential Proclamation extends for another year a policy that would require a $100,000 employer payment for certain H-1B workers seeking entry from outside the United States. However, a federal court vacated the payment requirement in June 2026, and it remains blocked while the government’s appeal proceeds. The new proclamation does not override that court ruling.

A separate executive order directs federal agencies to increase coordination and scrutiny of H-1B filings, including consideration of whether a sponsoring employer has recently conducted or is planning layoffs affecting similarly situated U.S. workers.

These developments may lead to additional documentation requests, investigations, Requests for Evidence, and closer review of certain H-1B petitions. Employers and foreign professionals should verify the current rules before filing a petition or making international travel plans.

Saluja Law will continue monitoring the litigation and agency guidance as these policies develop.

This post provides general information and does not constitute legal advice.

08/28/2026

IMMIGRATION UPDATE: The U.S. Department of State has temporarily paused the issuance of certain immigrant visas while consular officers receive guidance and training concerning revised public charge screening procedures.

The pause reportedly began in early August 2026 and appears to primarily affect some family-based immigrant visa applicants processing through U.S. embassies and consulates abroad. Certain interviews may be rescheduled for September, October, or November. Applicants should continue attending all scheduled appointments unless they receive official notice of a cancellation or postponement.

This development follows a federal court ruling addressing an earlier restriction on immigrant visa processing for applicants from 75 countries. An emergency motion has now been filed asking the court to determine whether the broader processing pause is consistent with that ruling. The government has characterized the pause as temporary, but its duration and ultimate legal effect remain uncertain.

Separately, the State Department is reportedly reviewing the possible revocation of certain B-1 business and B-2 visitor visas issued between 2016 and 2026 to individuals who later applied for asylum.

For individuals already in the United States with pending asylum applications, revocation of a visitor visa ordinarily does not automatically terminate the asylum application. Their ability to remain in the United States generally depends on the pending asylum or removal proceedings, rather than the continued validity of the visa used to enter. However, visa revocation could create significant problems for individuals who are outside the United States or who travel while their cases are pending.

Because these policies remain subject to change and ongoing litigation, affected individuals should closely monitor official communications, maintain updated financial and immigration records, and consult immigration counsel before making international travel or other significant decisions.

Saluja Law Offices, PLLC is monitoring these developments and is available to assist individuals affected by immigrant visa delays, public charge concerns, visa revocation, or pending asylum proceedings.

This post is for general informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Immigration policies may change, and each case must be evaluated based on its particular facts.

08/25/2026

The federal government is reportedly preparing to revoke certain visitor visas issued to individuals who later applied for asylum in the United States. The initiative could affect thousands of people who entered using B-1 business visas or B-2 tourist visas.

It is important to understand that applying for asylum after entering on a visitor visa does not automatically constitute fraud. Individuals may seek asylum when circumstances change, conditions in their home country deteriorate, or new threats make returning unsafe.

Likewise, a revoked visa does not automatically terminate a pending asylum application or result in immediate deportation. However, visa revocation can create serious immigration consequences, including possible removal proceedings, complications with international travel, and increased scrutiny of future immigration applications.

Every case depends on its specific facts, including the individual’s original intent when entering the United States, the circumstances supporting the asylum claim, and the current status of any pending immigration applications.

If you entered the United States on a visitor visa and subsequently applied for asylum, do not withdraw your application, leave the country, or disregard government notices without first consulting an experienced immigration attorney.

Saluja Law Offices, PLLC assists individuals and families with asylum applications, removal proceedings, and other complex immigration matters. Contact our office to discuss your situation and understand your available legal options.

08/18/2026

A new executive order may significantly affect how federal agencies recognize birthright citizenship for certain children born in the United States.

Signed on August 6, 2026, Executive Order 14418 directs federal agencies to deny citizenship documents when neither parent is a U.S. citizen and one parent falls within certain categories involving foreign government employment, terrorism designations, alleged birth-tourism transactions, fraud, or certain surrogacy arrangements.

The order follows a recent Supreme Court decision confirming that the Fourteenth Amendment generally grants citizenship to children born in the United States, including children whose parents are undocumented or temporarily present. The Court recognized a narrow exception for children whose parents possess diplomatic or comparable immunity.

The new order appears to extend beyond that traditional exception, raising serious constitutional questions. An executive order cannot amend the Fourteenth Amendment or override a controlling Supreme Court decision. The provisions involving birth tourism, foreign government employees, and surrogacy arrangements are therefore likely to face legal challenges.

Federal agencies must issue implementation guidance by September 5, 2026. Until that guidance is released, affected families may face uncertainty concerning passports, Social Security numbers, Certificates of Citizenship, and other federal documents.

Parents who believe the order could affect their child should preserve all immigration, birth, medical, employment, diplomatic, and surrogacy records and seek legal advice before responding to an agency inquiry.

Saluja Law Offices will continue monitoring the implementation of Executive Order 14418 and any resulting litigation.

This post is for general informational purposes and does not constitute legal advice.

08/18/2026

Growing uncertainty surrounding the H-1B visa program is causing many highly skilled professionals to reconsider whether their futures remain in the United States.

For an H-1B worker, a layoff is more than a loss of employment. Because lawful status is generally tied to continued qualifying employment, termination can quickly become an immigration crisis. An affected worker may have only a limited period to secure another sponsoring employer, pursue a different lawful status, or prepare to leave the country.

Job loss can also disrupt years of progress toward permanent residence. For professionals already facing lengthy employment-based visa backlogs, changing employers may complicate or delay the green card process. This uncertainty affects decisions about buying a home, changing careers, traveling, starting a business, and building a future in the United States.

Meanwhile, other countries are expanding their technology sectors and actively competing for the same talent. When experienced engineers, researchers, developers, and business leaders leave the United States, they take valuable knowledge and expertise with them.

H-1B professionals should not wait for a layoff or immigration problem before evaluating their options. Employers should also seek guidance before changing a sponsored worker’s duties, compensation, worksite, or employment relationship.

Proactive immigration planning can preserve options that may disappear once a deadline passes.

Saluja Law Offices assists professionals and employers with H-1B petitions, transfers, extensions, employment disruptions, and permanent residence planning. Contact our office to discuss how a job change, layoff, or evolving immigration policy may affect your status.

08/12/2026

The U.S. Department of State has announced that more than 175,000 visas have been revoked under the Trump Administration, signaling a significant expansion of immigration enforcement and "continuous vetting" of foreign nationals who hold U.S. visas.

For visa holders, the most important issue may not be the number of revocations, but what is triggering them.

According to the Department of State, many revocations have followed "law enforcement encounters" involving allegations such as DUI, reckless driving, assault, theft, drug offenses, fraud, and other criminal activity.

This distinction is important: an arrest is not a conviction, and a criminal charge is not a finding of guilt. Nevertheless, under the current enforcement environment, even an encounter with law enforcement may create immigration consequences before the criminal case is fully resolved.

The government's scrutiny also extends beyond criminal allegations. Visa revocations have reportedly involved social media activity, foreign policy and national security concerns, alleged immigration fraud, and other conduct the government believes may affect continued visa eligibility. International students have also faced heightened scrutiny, including expanded social media screening and thousands of reported student visa revocations.
What does this mean for visa holders?

A visa should no longer be viewed simply as a document that remains valid until the expiration date printed in the passport. Foreign nationals may remain subject to continuing government review after the visa has been issued.

If you are a noncitizen who has been arrested or charged with an offense, received notice concerning your visa, or are considering international travel following a potentially adverse immigration or criminal event, obtaining immigration advice before taking further action can be critical.

Visa revocation, lawful immigration status, inadmissibility, removability, and eligibility for future immigration benefits are separate legal issues. The consequences depend upon the individual's circumstances.

Saluja Law Offices, PLLC represents individuals, families, students, professionals, and businesses in complex U.S. immigration matters.

If you have questions about how an arrest, visa revocation, international travel, or another recent event may affect your immigration status, contact Saluja Law to discuss your circumstances.

This post is for general informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

Address

206 Capitol Street Suite 400
Charleston, WV
25301

Opening Hours

Monday	8am - 5pm
Tuesday	8am - 5pm
Wednesday	8am - 5pm
Thursday	8am - 5pm
Friday	8am - 5pm

Telephone

+13047551101

Website

http://www.salujalaw.com/

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when Saluja Law posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.