LGR Law, LLC

11/12/2025

Federal Sentencing Guidelines: 2025 Amendments to
Supervised Release

As of November 1, 2025, major updates to the federal supervised release guidelines will take effect. These changes emphasize individualized, case-by-case decisions; reflecting a shift away from the traditional one-size-fits-all model.

Individualized Assessments and Tailored Terms:
Courts are now required to make individualized determinations when deciding whether to impose supervised release, the appropriate length of the term, and the specific conditions to apply. The court must explain on the record their reasoning for imposing, not imposing, or modifying supervised release, taking into account the statutory factors and the unique circumstances of each case. These amendments remove the previous default expectation that courts should automatically impose the statutory maximum term for certain offenses, including s*x offenses. Instead, they provide greater flexibility for judges to tailor supervised release terms that best promote public safety and support rehabilitation.

We at LGR Law are federal criminal defense attorneys in New York and New Jersey. We have successfully handled many early termination of supervised release cases as well as violations of supervised release. We also stay on top of changes in federal laws such as these recent changes in the federal sentencing guidelines. We’re here to help. Call or email us if you have any questions or run into any issues with your federal supervised release.

We protect your freedom and fight for your rights.

https://lgaulirufo.com/blog/federal-sentencing-guidelines-2025-amendments-to-supervised-release/

06/19/2025

Friends, family and colleagues!
On Sunday June 22, 2025, our firm, LGR Law, LLC, will be participating as a team in the Baldassare and MaraTHON 5K Walk/Run to benefit Danny's Pantry.
Some background about Danny's pantry for those who do not know:
In August of 2024, the District of New Jersey’s Board of Judges approved the ​opening of a food pantry named in honor of ​Judge Salas’s son, Daniel Anderl. This pantry, ​known as “Danny’s Pantry,” was established in remembrance ​of the fourth anniversary of Daniel’s tragic death. To transform ​sorrow into positivity, the District Court established this ​pantry to assist the many families in need who come through ​the court doors. Participants in the Pretrial Opportunity ​Program and ReNew Program and others served by this court, ​may obtain food staples donated to the pantry by the federal ​court family and friends. The pantry helps alleviate the burdens faced by ​many poverty-stricken families and individuals while, connecting ​the Court to the surrounding community.
Our team (LGR Law) has a fund raising goal of $2500. Help us meet that goal! Here is the link and URL code to donate. Please help us to meet our goal!!!
Here is our fundraiser link -- or use the QR code below to donate. Thank you!
https://runsignup.com/Race/180714/Donate/XAlF2dfr4FgK9aaJ
Hate is Heavy - Love is Light!

04/02/2025

Recent updates in Federal Healthcare Fraud indicate a more aggressive approach to combating these alleged crimes. In the last year, the Department of Justice (DOJ) announced its National Health Care Fraud Enforcement Action, charging 193 defendants, including doctors, nurse practitioners, and other medical professionals across 32 federal districts nationwide. They have been alleged to be responsible for over $2.75 billion in intended losses to federal programs. The action focuses on fighting the ever-evolving healthcare fraud tactics like lab fraud, telemedicine fraud, unnecessary procedures, and opioid abuse...
https://lgaulirufo.com/healthcare-fraud/

12/17/2024

Protecting Your Rights in Federal Criminal Cases

If you’re facing federal criminal charges, understanding your rights is crucial for building a strong defense. This guide outlines key strategies to protect your rights and navigate the complexities of federal criminal cases.
https://lgaulirufo.com/protecting-your-rights-in-federal-criminal-cases/

11/05/2024

Know Your Rights – A Guide of Your Rights if Accused of a
Crime

Understanding your rights if you have been accused of a crime is an essential step in protecting yourself during the legal process. This guide will outline your rights under the Fourth, Fifth, and Sixth Amendments.
https://lgaulirufo.com/criminal-accusation-guide/

11/01/2024

This term, the Supreme Court is deciding Esteras v. United States, a case that could reshape sentencing for individuals who violate conditions of their supervised release, potentially shifting the focus from rehabilitation to a blend of punishment and rehabilitation. The central question is
whether judges should be allowed to weigh punishment-related factors—like the seriousness of the offense, promoting respect for the law, or ensuring just punishment—when sentencing
someone for violating supervised release.
https://lgaulirufo.com/esteras-v-us/

10/09/2024

The United States Sentencing Guideline Amendments, effective November 1, 2024, introduce important changes, including the exclusion of acquitted conduct from sentencing and clarified loss calculation rules. The amendments also resolve conflicts on firearm serial number legibility and allow for reduced sentences for youthful offenders. At LGR Law Group, we stay up-to-date on these changes to offer experienced federal criminal defense.
https://lgaulirufo.com/the-united-state…eline-amendments/

09/13/2024

How a Federal Criminal Case Starts - When faced with a federal criminal case, understanding how proceedings begin can significantly impact your defense strategy. Federal criminal cases can commence primarily in three ways – indictment, complaint, or information. Each method has its unique procedures and implications, underscoring the necessity of a skilled federal criminal defense attorney to navigate these complex waters.
https://lgaulirufo.com/how-a-federal-criminal-case-starts/

How a Federal Criminal Case Starts - Lorraine Gauli-Rufo and LGR Law Group focus on defending federal charges brought in New Jersey or in Manhattan, New York, and White Plains. If you or a loved one is facing federal criminal charges or is under investigation by federal agents or have been contacted...

08/27/2024

Federal bribery involves offering, giving, receiving, or soliciting something of value to influence the actions of an official or an individual in a position of power. This offense strikes at the heart of public trust and integrity. Our experienced attorneys closely scrutinize federal statutes and stay abreast of any changes in criminal statutes and the case law, interpreting those statutes in order to effectively defend our clients.
https://lgaulirufo.com/bribery-and-extortion/

08/20/2024

Federal cybercrimes encompass a broad range of offenses involving the use of computers, the internet, or digital technology, including computer and internet fraud, among other federal crimes. At LGR Law, we have successfully handled numerous federal cybercrime cases. With over 30 years of experience in federal criminal defense, our attorneys and legal team are equipped to provide top-rated federal criminal defense in New York and New Jersey federal courts. If you or a loved one are threatened or charged with a federal cybercrime or computer-related offense in New Jersey, Manhattan, or White Plains, NY, contact LGR Law for a free consultation.
https://lgaulirufo.com/what-are-federal-cyber-crimes/

08/09/2024

In a landmark decision on June 27, 2024, the Supreme Court fundamentally altered civil securities fraud enforcement brought by the Securities Exchange Commission (“SEC”) with its ruling in SEC v. Jarkesy. The Court held defendants are entitled to a jury trial when the SEC seeks civil penalties for security fraud violations. This shift has profound implications for prosecuting and defending civil security fraud matters.
https://lgaulirufo.com/a-sea-change-in-securities-fraud-the-implications-of-sec-v-jarkesy/

07/02/2024

On June 26, 2024, the Supreme Court of the United States issued its opinion in Snyder v. United States, holding that a federal anti-corruption statute, 18 U.S.C. § 666(a)(1)(B), does not criminalize gratuities given to public officials as a token of appreciation for taking an official act. Rather, the statute criminalizes only quid pro quo style bribery. Snyder is a huge win for the defense bar, and its holding significantly narrows the scope of conduct that federal prosecutors can charge as criminal under 18 U.S.C. § 666(a)(1)(B).

https://bit.ly/4cFUnjr

On June 26, 2024, the Supreme Court in Snyder v. United States ruled that 18 U.S.C. § 666(a)(1)(B) does not criminalize gratuities to public officials without proof of a quid pro quo, significantly impacting federal anti-corruption law.