Rousso & Jackel, Attorneys

Rousso & Jackel, Attorneys We are Employment specialists, especially wage and hour practices. Contract drafting/review. Small We are experienced and talented trial lawyers.

Rousso & Jackel is the law partnership of Nora Rousso and Jonathan Jackel. We are employment law specialists, especially in the area of wage and hour claims. We advise and counsel employers on a number of employment-related matters, including employee contracts, severance agreements, commission claims and employee manuals.

California Court of Appeals issued largest fine to date ($10K) for misuse of AI in court briefing.  Just FYI, a human be...
09/24/2025

California Court of Appeals issued largest fine to date ($10K) for misuse of AI in court briefing. Just FYI, a human being (me) drafted this post.

The court of appeals issued an historic fine after 21 of 23 quotes in the lawyer's opening brief were fake. Courts want more AI regulations.

08/24/2021

Prop 22 (Uber/Lyft drivers as "Independent Contractors" was declared unconstitutional by an Alameda County Superior Court judge. The opinion (attached) is very hard to understand, even for us. We thought that the initiative's requirement of a 7/8 vote to amend would not pass muster; the court did not say that, only noting that this section did make amendment "difficult to the point of near-impossibility."
The court said that Prop 22 was unconstitutional for two reasons:
1: "... because it limits the power of a future legislature to define app-based drivers as workers subject to workers’ compensation law and
2-“... because it defines unrelated legislation as an “amendment” and is not germane to Proposition 22's stated“theme, purpose, or subject.” Because the offending sections could not be severed from the remainder of the statute, the "entirety of Proposition 22 is unenforceable."
We have been following this case for some time and we can say that the litigation is not over by a long shot. Stay tuned.

Our favorite founder and partner is in the news!Serial ADA filer sets sights on Bay Area merchants, submitting 1,000 com...
06/28/2021

Our favorite founder and partner is in the news!

Serial ADA filer sets sights on Bay Area merchants, submitting 1,000 complaints in two years

Indicted attorney’s cases range from Sacramento to Hayward to San Jose

In a highly watched case, SCOTUS ruled in favor 8-1 of a high school cheerleader who was thrown off her cheer squad afte...
06/23/2021

In a highly watched case, SCOTUS ruled in favor 8-1 of a high school cheerleader who was thrown off her cheer squad after posting a Snapchat filled with f-bombs when she did not make the varsity squad. At issue was the school's right to regulate speech off campus. The ruling is narrowly crafted and does not change long standing precedent, so we can certainly expect future rulings. The case is fascinating; see attached link to the SCOTUS blog, which has the whole history and a link to today's opinion.

A Pennsylvania school district on Wednesday may have won the war over regulating off-campus student speech, but it lost the battle over a cheerleader’s profanity-laden complaint on Snapchat. The justices ruled that the First Amendment allows schools to regulate at least some student speech that oc...

10/06/2020

Today SCOTUS issued a slew of orders, including the denial of a petition for a "writ of certiorari" by Kim Davis, the Kentucky county clerk who refused to issue a marriage license to a same-sex couple because of her "sincere religious beliefs." Justice Thomas indicated that we can expect an assault on Obergefell (landmark case recognizing the right of same-sex couples to marry) sooner rather than later. Link to the orders below; scroll down almost to the bottom to see Thomas' statement, joined by Alito. Obergefell was 5-4; one guess as to how Judge Amy would rule.

On Friday Governor Newsom signed AB-2257, which "cleans up" some of the confusion/concerns stemming from AB-5, the "inde...
09/08/2020

On Friday Governor Newsom signed AB-2257, which "cleans up" some of the confusion/concerns stemming from AB-5, the "independent contractor" legislation. The Labor Code will be amended, effective immediately and many occupations will now be held to the earlier (less restrictive) standard for determining whether an individual is an "employee" or an "independent contractor."

There are now exemptions for musicians, freelance writers, interpreters, translators and photographers. Significantly, all kinds of workers can now operate as self-employed professionals and can do business with each other. Agencies connecting freelancers with clients who handle the payments without supervising their work can still operate. For example, event planners who hire florists, makeup artists and musicians for a wedding will not now become their employers.

AB-5 adopted the "ABC test" as articulated in the "Dynamex" decision by the California Supreme court, which held that businesses must treat workers as employees unless they meet three conditions: (A) The worker is free from the company’s control, (B) the work they perform is not central to the company’s main business, and (C) they have established their own independent business in that line of work. This was problematic for many in the "gig" economy, who do work for themselves but may not have an "established" independent business. Figuring out what is and is not "central" to an employer's business was equally confounding.

We predicted that the law would evolve and it will continue to evolve. This legislation also does not affect the Uber/Lyft litigation as described in earlier posts. The pandemic put the brakes on lawsuits, where parties argue that the law should be applied in a certain way, but ultimately the courts will affect how the law is applied. The full text of the bill is included here. Feel free to contact us with your specific questions.

08/15/2020

The Uber/Lyft litigation continues. A San Francisco Superior Court judge granted a motion for preliminary injunction filed by the AG of California (plus city attorneys from SF, LA & SD). Uber wants to keep classifying its drivers as "independent contractors" in violation of AB-5. Uber wanted to stay this litigation for three reasons: A pending Constitutional challenge to AB-5 currently in federal court; the outcome of Prop 22, the Uber/Lyft-sponsored initiative that would exempt them from AB-5, and the "final" disposition of the various lawsuits and arbitrations involving these same claims, i.e. are rideshare drivers properly classified as independent contractors or employees? The judge said "no soap" and Uber is threatening to leave California for a while. The law regarding proper classification of employees is still fluid and I suspect some hybrid between "employee" and "independent contractor" will be created one day. Link to opinion below:

The California Supreme Court lowered the passing score for the Bar Exam & the next exam will be administered online.  I ...
07/17/2020

The California Supreme Court lowered the passing score for the Bar Exam & the next exam will be administered online. I suppose we can always be proud of passing the exam when the bar was higher. (Three days, not two, more essays, and a higher passing score needed). Prospective exam takers: PM me-I am available for tutoring!

The California Supreme Court on Thursday announced it will permanently lower the passing score for the California Bar Exam and released plans for an October test administered online.

SCC Superior Court jury trials to resume on a limited basis this week. Link to press release below.
06/19/2020

SCC Superior Court jury trials to resume on a limited basis this week. Link to press release below.

The Santa Clara County Superior Court will be resuming jury service and trials this week. Although the County and State Shelter-In-Place orders may continue into June and beyond, jury service continues to be a vital government function and all summoned jurors must report as directed. 

Latest health order from SCC, which will be updated again June 5.  If there is a conflict between state/local orders (e....
06/04/2020

Latest health order from SCC, which will be updated again June 5. If there is a conflict between state/local orders (e.g. where state order is more relaxed, "you must comply with the stricter of the two orders."

Learn more Shelter-in-Place and other public health orders on how coronavirus affects healthcare operations, businesses, caretaking, travel, and more.

06/03/2020

Hollywood proposes safety guidelines to CA & NY re COVID-19

Address

51 E Campbell Avenue, Suite 400-Y
Campbell, CA
95008

Opening Hours

Monday 9am - 6pm
Tuesday 9am - 6pm
Wednesday 9am - 6pm
Thursday 9am - 6pm
Friday 9am - 6pm

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when Rousso & Jackel, Attorneys posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Contact The Practice

Send a message to Rousso & Jackel, Attorneys:

Share