Trow & Rahal, PC

Trow & Rahal, PC Trow & Rahal is a business immigration law firm helping businesses, families, athletes & entrepreneurs.

Attorneys Stephen Trow, Linda Rahal, and Cynthia Hemphill, owners and shareholders of Trow & Rahal, P.C. are widely recognized as leading business immigration attorneys and have a solid reputation within the legal community, as evidenced by their inclusion in The Best Lawyers in America. Their reputation for high ethical standards has earned them recognition in the Martindale-Hubbell Bar Register

of Preeminent Lawyers. Having helped clients with their immigration issues for several decades, they know that immigration issues affect many aspects of an individual’s professional and personal life. Developing solutions quickly and effectively can be critical. As your immigration law firm, Trow & Rahal will stay on top of rapidly changing regulations, steer around the roadblocks in the system, and when needed, craft a customized solution to help you cross the finish line and receive the benefits you require.

Born in Jamaica in 1889, Claude McKay became one of the defining literary voices of the Harlem Renaissance. He first gai...
06/18/2026

Born in Jamaica in 1889, Claude McKay became one of the defining literary voices of the Harlem Renaissance.

He first gained recognition for poetry that reflected Jamaican rural life, language, and culture. In 1912, he came to the United States to study, first at Tuskegee Institute and then at Kansas State College.

McKay later moved to New York, where his writing became part of the literary and political energy of Harlem in the early twentieth century.

His work often explored race, labor, migration, resistance, and belonging. His 1919 poem “If We Must Die,” written during a period of racial violence in the United States, became one of his best-known works and a powerful expression of dignity in the face of oppression.

His 1922 poetry collection Harlem Shadows helped establish him as a major voice of the Harlem Renaissance. Building on that success, his 1928 novel Home to Harlem became a bestseller and brought everyday Black life in Harlem into American literature with a vividness that was both celebrated and debated.

McKay’s influence also extended beyond the United States. His 1929 novel Banjo, set among Black seamen and dockworkers in Marseille, helped shape conversations about race, colonialism, and Black identity across the African diaspora.

His writing carried the influence of his Jamaican roots while speaking to questions that reached far beyond one country: who belongs, who is heard, and how people build dignity in the face of exclusion.

His story reflects how an immigrant voice can become part of a nation’s literary foundation and still resonate across the world.

06/16/2026

The U.S. Department of State has announced that the EB-2 India immigrant visa category has reached its annual limit for Fiscal Year 2026.

As a result, EB-2 immigrant visas for applicants chargeable to India may not be issued for the remainder of the U.S. government fiscal year that ends on September 30th. USCIS also cannot approve adjustment of status applications in the EB-2 India category while visa numbers are unavailable.

The annual limits will reset on October 1, 2026, when Fiscal Year 2027 begins. At that point, immigrant visa issuance and adjustment approvals may resume for qualified applicants, depending on visa availability.

This follows the warning language in the June Visa Bulletin, which noted that categories may become temporarily unavailable if annual, category, or per-country limits are reached.

For applicants, this is an important reminder that the Visa Bulletin is not just about whether a priority date appears current on paper. Filing and approval eligibility can also be affected by annual limits, per-country caps, category demand, and the specific chart USCIS is using for adjustment of status filings.

In a time of continued backlogs and shifting visa availability, applicants should be watching not only where their priority date stands today, but also whether their category may become more limited in the months ahead.

Two recent federal court decisions have provided relief for employers and foreign nationals affected by significant immi...
06/15/2026

Two recent federal court decisions have provided relief for employers and foreign nationals affected by significant immigration policy changes.

On June 8, a federal district court in Massachusetts vacated the administration’s supplemental $100,000 fee for certain H-1B petitions. The court concluded that the fee functioned as a tax, which is beyond the president’s authority to impose because that power rests with Congress.

In a separate decision on June 5, a federal district court in Rhode Island held that USCIS’s “hold-and-review” policy for certain immigration benefit applications was unlawful. That policy had affected individuals who are citizens of or were born in one of 39 countries and had prompted the agency to pause review and adjudication of certain benefit requests.

Both decisions apply nationwide.

For employers, the H-1B ruling blocks enforcement of the supplemental $100,000 fee for subject petitions, at least for now. Regular H-1B filing fees remain in place. Employers with pending cases where USCIS issued a request for the $100,000 fee should speak with counsel about how to respond and whether potential refunds may be available.

For foreign nationals, the decision vacating the “hold-and-review” policy should open the door to renewed processing of pending applications and benefit requests that were delayed or placed on hold under the now-voided policy.

The legal landscape remains fluid. The government may appeal, and future court orders or agency guidance could alter the current posture quickly.

Trow & Rahal will continue to monitor both matters and issue updates as they become available.

For more information, read our full news alert at https://www.trowrahal.com/library/t-r-immigration-news-alert-june-9-2026.cfm

Before Celia Cruz became known around the world as the Queen of Salsa, she was Úrsula Hilaria Celia de la Caridad Cruz A...
06/11/2026

Before Celia Cruz became known around the world as the Queen of Salsa, she was Úrsula Hilaria Celia de la Caridad Cruz Alfonso, born in Havana, Cuba.

Her voice would eventually become one of the most recognizable in Latin music, but her story was also shaped by immigration, exile, and the complicated meaning of home.

After the Cuban Revolution, Cruz left Cuba and built much of her career in the United States. Like many immigrants, she carried her country with her even as she created a new life elsewhere.

In the United States, Cruz became a defining figure in the rise of salsa music, especially through the vibrant Latin music scene in New York. Her voice, stage presence, and unmistakable “¡Azúcar!” helped make her an international icon.

She succeeded in a male-dominated industry, performed across generations, and became a cultural bridge for Cuban Americans, Caribbean immigrants, Latin American communities, and music lovers around the world.

Cruz became a naturalized U.S. citizen in 1977, but she never stopped honoring Cuba as part of her identity. Her life reflects one of the most powerful truths about immigration: beginning again does not mean leaving everything behind.

Immigrants bring language, memory, culture, talent, faith, art, and history with them.

Celia Cruz helped shape American music and culture while keeping the spirit of her homeland alive.

USCIS Approves New R-1 Petition Following Recent Regulatory Change – Pastor Can Continue Serving His Congregation!We are...
06/10/2026

USCIS Approves New R-1 Petition Following Recent Regulatory Change – Pastor Can Continue Serving His Congregation!

We are proud to share a recent success! USCIS has approved an R-1 petition for a pastor who is nearing the maximum five-year period of authorized stay in R-1 status.

Previously, R-1 nonimmigrant religious workers who reached the five-year limit were required to remain abroad for one year before returning in R-1 status. A recent regulatory change earlier this year eliminates that waiting period, allowing eligible R-1 workers to obtain a new visa through consular processing and promptly resume their religious work in the United States.

In this case, USCIS approved the petition for the maximum initial validity period of 30 months. The pastor may subsequently obtain an extension of up to an additional 30 months, allowing for a new five-year period of authorized stay in R-1 status.

This change is especially meaningful and timely in light of the significant backlog in the employment-based fourth preference (EB-4) category for religious workers. Because many religious workers are unable to complete the permanent residence process within their initial period of R-1 stay, the ability to obtain a new period of R-1 status without a mandatory one-year absence helps minimize disruptions to religious organizations and the communities they serve.

We are honored to support individuals and organizations making meaningful contributions to their communities.

 : When reviewing the Visa Bulletin, always check which chart USCIS is using for adjustment of status filings that month...
06/09/2026

: When reviewing the Visa Bulletin, always check which chart USCIS is using for adjustment of status filings that month.

The Visa Bulletin includes two different charts: Final Action Dates and Dates for Filing.

The Dates for Filing chart may allow certain applicants to begin the process earlier by filing an adjustment of status application before a visa number is ready for final approval.

The Final Action Dates chart is different. It reflects when immigrant visa numbers are authorized for final action, which generally makes it the more restrictive chart for applicants waiting to file applications for adjustment of status to permanent resident.

USCIS decides each month which chart can be used for adjustment filings. That decision can change from month to month and may be different for family-sponsored and employment-based categories.

For June 2026, family-sponsored applicants may use the Dates for Filing chart, while employment-based applicants must use the Final Action Dates chart.

This is a small detail with significant consequences.

An applicant may appear eligible under one chart but not under the chart USCIS is accepting for adjustment filings that month.

Before filing, applicants should confirm their preference category, country of chargeability, priority date, and the USCIS filing chart for that specific month. In immigration, timing is rarely just administrative. It can determine whether an application can be filed at all.

This Thursday, June 11, Linda Rahal will be speaking as part of an upcoming myLawCLE webinar, “Counseling Clients on Exp...
06/08/2026

This Thursday, June 11, Linda Rahal will be speaking as part of an upcoming myLawCLE webinar, “Counseling Clients on Expatriation: Advising U.S. Citizens, Green Card Holders, and Their Beneficiaries.”

This program will address the immigration, tax, estate planning, and compliance issues that can arise when U.S. citizens or long-term green card holders are considering expatriation.

Topics will include citizenship termination, abandonment of lawful permanent residence, exit tax exposure, planning for covered gifts and bequests, and compliance considerations for U.S. beneficiaries.

For attorneys advising globally mobile individuals and families, expatriation can raise complex questions that extend far beyond the decision to give up citizenship or green card status.

The webinar will take place on June 11, 2026 at 1:00 PM EST.

Use code ExpatriationCLE for free access.

Register here: https://mylawcle.com/products/counseling-clients-on-expatriation-advising-u-s-citizens-green-card-holders-and-their-beneficiaries/

For June 2026, USCIS has announced that employment-based adjustment of status applicants must use the Final Action Dates...
06/08/2026

For June 2026, USCIS has announced that employment-based adjustment of status applicants must use the Final Action Dates chart.

While family-sponsored applicants may use the Dates for Filing chart in June, employment-based applicants must look to the Final Action Dates chart to determine whether they are eligible to file an adjustment of status application.

This is important because the Final Action Dates chart is generally more restrictive with a longer backlog. Some applicants who may appear eligible under the Dates for Filing chart will not be eligible to file if their category is limited to Final Action Dates.

The June Visa Bulletin also warned that additional retrogression, or even categories becoming temporarily unavailable, may be necessary if annual, category, or per-country visa limits are reached.

That warning is no longer theoretical for some applicants.

The Department of State has announced that all available immigrant visas in the Employment-Based Second Preference category for applicants chargeable to India have been used for fiscal year 2026. As a result, embassies and consulates may not issue EB-2 immigrant visas for India chargeability for the remainder of the fiscal year. The annual limits will reset at the start of fiscal year 2027 on October 1, 2026.

For applicants, this underscores the importance of watching not only where a priority date stands today, but whether a category may become more limited, retrogress further, or become unavailable before the end of the fiscal year.

For employment-based applicants, this month’s filing eligibility depends on the applicant’s preference category, country of chargeability, priority date, and the applicable Final Action Date.

In a time of continued backlogs, shifting government guidance, and category-specific visa limits, careful review of the Visa Bulletin remains essential before making filing decisions.

You can view the full Visa Bulletin here: https://travel.state.gov/content/travel/en/legal/visa-law0/visa-bulletin/2026/visa-bulletin-for-june-2026.html

Did You Know? Adjustment of Status became part of U.S. immigration law in the 1950s largely to reduce the burden and dis...
06/05/2026

Did You Know? Adjustment of Status became part of U.S. immigration law in the 1950s largely to reduce the burden and disruption caused by requiring certain applicants to leave the country for visa processing abroad.

Before Adjustment of Status existed in its modern form, many individuals already living, working, or building families in the United States still had to depart the country and complete immigrant visa processing through a U.S. consulate overseas before returning as permanent residents.

The process could be costly, time-consuming, and disruptive for both families and employers.

Adjustment of Status created a pathway for certain eligible applicants already inside the United States to apply for permanent residence without leaving the country, helping make the immigration process more practical for many applicants.

Now, decades later, recent USCIS policy guidance has once again sparked discussion about the role and future interpretation of Adjustment of Status within the U.S. immigration system.

Immigration law has continued to evolve through changing legislation, policies, and agency interpretations — which is just one reason staying informed remains so important.

Address

3 Bethesda Metro Center, Suite 610
Bethesda, MD
20814

Opening Hours

Monday 9am - 6pm
Tuesday 9am - 6pm
Wednesday 9am - 6pm
Thursday 9am - 6pm
Friday 9am - 6pm

Telephone

+12025374830

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when Trow & Rahal, PC posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Contact The Practice

Send a message to Trow & Rahal, PC:

Featured

Share