Malak Law Associate

Malak Law Associate Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice every where

Feel free to contact for legal services
06/12/2024

Feel free to contact for legal services

Contact me for any legal advice
06/12/2024

Contact me for any legal advice

26/05/2023

we provide high-quality legal services with genuine interest, integrity, professionalism, and respect for our clients and the community.

02/02/2022

Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice every where

Good morning friends
01/02/2022

Good morning friends

26/01/2022

2021 P Cr. L J 55

Control of Narcotic Substances Act (XXV of 1997)---
----S. 9(c)---Qanun-e-Shahadat (10 of 1984), Art. 8---Name of informer, non-disclosure of---Scope---Police was legally not bound to mention name of informer (spy) in FIR---Police had legal protection to keep secret the name of informer (spy).

Control of Narcotic Substances Act (XXV of 1997)---
----S. 9(c)---Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898), Ss. 63 & 167---Discharge of accused---Complainant as investigating officer---Scope---Accused was arrested for recovery of 3800 grams of Charas from car driven by him---Duty Magistrate instead of sending accused to judicial lock up discharged him of the offence as complainant himself had investigated the case---Validity---No legal bar existed that complainant of case registered under Control of Narcotic Substances Act, 1997, could not be the investigating officer of that case---Functioning of police officer in a case of narcotics, in his dual capacity as a complainant and as an investigating officer, was neither illegal nor unlawful, so long as it did not prejudice the case of accused person---Question of prejudice (if any) could not be proved at the time of trial and an accused could not be discharged on such ground without recording of evidence by Trial Court---High Court set aside order passed by the Magistrate as the same was result of colourful exercise of his powers and was passed on the basis of extraneous reasons---High Court directed to take accused in custody and remanded the matter to Magistrate to decide application for judicial remand---Constitutional petition was allowed, in circumstances.

26/01/2022

ضمانت رد
Accused was nominated in the FIR with a specific role of causing firearm injury to the injured witness

2020 SCMR 937 SUPREME-COURT Side Appellant : BILAL KHAN Side Opponent : StateS. 497--- Penal Code (XLV of 1860), Ss. 324, 34 & 109---Constitution of Pakistan, Art. 185(3)---Attempt to commit qatl-i-amd, common intention, abetment--- bail , refusal of--- Accused was nominated in the FIR with a specific role of causing firearm injury to the injured witness--- Said injured witness had implicated the accused and stood by his statement---Sufficient material was available on record to connect the accused with the crime---Offence also fell within the prohibitory clause of S. 497, Cr.P.C.---Petition for leave to appeal was dismissed and accused was refused bail in circumstances.

Address

Naushahro

Opening Hours

Monday 09:00 - 17:00
Tuesday 09:00 - 17:00
Wednesday 09:00 - 17:00
Thursday 09:00 - 17:00
Friday 09:00 - 17:00
Saturday 09:00 - 17:00

Telephone

+923005191566

Website

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when Malak Law Associate posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Contact The Practice

Send a message to Malak Law Associate:

Shortcuts

Share

Category