Muhammad Irfan Khan Adv.

Directions

Muhammad Irfan Khan Adv. He represents and advises clients in Pakistan.

Muhammad Irfan Khan, Advocate High Court, is a Pakistan-based legal professional providing legal consultation, litigation, and representation in Family, Criminal, Constitutional, and Civil matters.

30/05/2026

2026 SCMR P.217
سپریم کورٹ نے منشیات مقدمہ میں گاڑی ٹرک جس کے خفیہ خانوں میں سے ( #بیروئن800گرام گرام #افیون 6 کلوگرام 8.4 کلوگرام #چرس )مجموعہ طور پر 15 کلو گرام آئس ،ہیروئن ،میں سوار ڈرائیور کے بیٹے کو ضمانت منظور کرتے ہوئے قرار دیا ہے کہ صرف موجودگی ۔ کافی نہیں جب تک ملزم کا خصوصی علم یا جرم میں عملی طور شراکت ثابت نہ ہو ۔ چونکہ سازش یا علم ثابت نہ ہو سکا #ملزمان کا #باپ، #بیٹا کا #رشتہ ہونا کافی نہیں، اس لیے کا )further inquiry( معاملہ مزید تحقیق اور ملزم کو ضمانت دے دی گئی ۔

20/03/2026

*Judgments on Maintenance by Grandfather*

*PLD 2012 Lahore 445*
*PLD 2012 Lahore 148*
*PLD 2011 Lahore 610*
*PLD 2010 Lahore 119*
*2005 SCMR 1293*
*2004 YLR 616*

_____________________________
*2016 PLD 622 LAHORE*
_____________________________
Ss. 13 & 5, Sched---Maintenance allowance---Grand father, liability of---ex*****on petition---Procedure---ex*****on of a decree against a person who was not party to the suit---Scope---Minors filed suit for maintenance allowance against their father which was decree d---Judgment debtor (father) was sent to civil prison till the satisfaction of decree and property belonging to the grandfather was ordered to be attached---Contention of grandfather was that he was not party to the suit and decree could not be executed against him---Validity---Liability of grandfather to maintain his grandchildren would start when father was poor and infirm and mother was also not in a position to provide maintenance to her children---Such liability of grandfather was dependent upon the fact that he was in easy circumstances---If father and mother were alive then grandfather could not be held responsible for maintenance of his grandchildren unless it was first determined that he was in easy circumstances---family Court was bound to first adjudicate and determine such fact which could not be done unless he was a party to the suit having fair opportunity to explain his status and position---No decree could be executed against a person who was not a party to the proceedings---Executing court could not go beyond the decree ---decree passed by the family Court would remain in field to the extent of actual judgment-debtor even after suffering civil prison unless it was satisfied---Process of ex*****on of decree could not shift towards the grandfather only on account of mere fact that judgment-debtor had failed to discharge his liability under the decree --family Court could adopt the procedure provided in Civil Procedure Code, 1908 for ex*****on of its decree ---Judgment-debtor could be sent to civil prison for one year--Impugned order for attachment of property of grandfather was un-warranted by law which was declared illegal and unlawful---Constitutional petition was allowed in circumstances.

Address

Mian G Height AlFalah Center Behria Town Lahore
Lahore

Website

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when Muhammad Irfan Khan Adv. posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Shortcuts

Share

Category